- Reaction score
- 292
Have you seen joe tilman in real life? Even doctors say you can only get 28-30% coverage. That is "not full coversgs". And you're sleeping if you think you can be a Norwood 2.5 with 40% density lmaoooo. Dude the numbers don't lie.... denial is strong with you. And no.... I'd rather be bald than have extremely low wispy fluff on my head. There are tons of posts online of men in their 30-40s that wish they never got planted because "you'll never get full coverage" and "they don't tell you your donor will thin" and "the transplanted hairs now look like unmanageable weeds". Trust me I've done my research. I almost got a minor hair transplant twice, went on 3 consults and read a ridiculous amount of reviews for YEARS. Trust me when I say, aside from Rare cases, like 2%, if you were past a Norwood 3 you're fucked.32% density well-combed and styled is light-years ahead of a shiny bald NW6.
Also, you forget that you can opt for a NW2.5 hair line and pack more hair up there.
Each Norwood easily eats up 2000 grafts. So if you choose a NW2.5 hair line, you'll have 3000 grafts to spread out on your NW2.5.
Just look at Joe Tillman, who even had two failed hair transplants and has had 10000 grafts in total, he looks great.
Yeah he has to style his hair properly, he has to use hairspray, but come on, don't tell me he should have just remained bald because having hair transplants is not perfect.
You remind me of my cousin who tells me that we should just give up on our democracy and social structures because corruption happens sometimes. "What a load of crap! Democracy is not even perfect, we should tear it down and transition to a dictatorship!"
Hair transplants only give you 40% of your hair back (if you chose the higher hair line), therefore, we should just remain bald!
Lol, no.