Thanks for your answers.
I just want to point out one detail in case you didn’t realize about it. The blue design lines I marked on the right picture are based on the REAL design lines that the surgeon draw on my head, you still can see them, quite dim, on the left picture… so… my concern is...
Sorry but I did not completely understand your answer. Do you mean that he should have filled the spot or not? He did not ask me for more grafts, we just formally agreed 3000 grafts previous to the operation, he should have asked for more in this situation?
Don’t you think that hair should have been implanted in the red spot? If you look at the left side the surgeon implanted following his line of design, but on the right side he left that empty spot.
Don’t you think that’s weird? Maybe a wrong grafts estimation?
Yes, I read that fragment, but I think you misconstrued it. As far as I know the study is scientific, what they mean with "clinical evidence is still weak" is that more studies have to be done by others too. In any case, the results they obtained are pretty visible.
I have been seeking more information and I have found several studies which conclude that the procedure has positive results, I really don't know what to think at this point...
Here I leave you one of these studies: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4134641/
RESULTS
Before...
My surgeon strongly recommended I get a PRP treatment. The first session is for free and I would have to pay the rest of them (2 or 3 more he says).
What do you think about this? I have done a lot of research about it but still don’t get to a clear point. I have read people (doctors and...
NW3, FUE procedure, 3000 grafts.
Do you think the distribution is correct? Or can you see something wrong? I won’t tell my personal opinion yet, so I don’t influence your answers.