I am struggling to see how 19 hairs per cm2 is going to have any cosmetic benefit? I mean even if this treatment was on the market today wouldn't low norwoods prefer to have a hair transplant for greater density and cosmetic benefit than can be achieved with follica?
Follicle Thought on May 12, 2017 at 5:02 pm
One thing that is important for you and others to know is the product does not contain stem cells. This is why it is able to be made stable at room temp, just like all those expensive skin creams. It contains a molecule secreted by stem cells...
The thing is though, if follica is out in 2019 then It could take untill the end of 2020 for it to look fully grown in...and thats over 3 more years of waiting for thw hair to look decent
As Follica, is the closest potential treatment to market that can generate new follicles, what are forum members predictions for a realistic release date?
If there was an ETA to market provided by Follica this would help people considering whether to commit to a hair transplant to hold off or...
How does the 5 year safety and efficacy data release for Replicel stack up against Histogen? Which treatment seems to be most effective so far?
http://www.hairlosscure2020.com/brief-items-of-interest-january-2017/
Resu have you overlayed a photoshop filter on that second pic or lightened the contrast in those bottom pics to get a better idea of how effective the treatment was? I didn't see the bottom set of pics on their site...
Bear in mind thats only at 14 weeks though...
I am wondering how far into trails they are, and are they only running FDA trails in the states or other countries as well...
There is some conflicting information, the flow chat above states 'clinical trail ready'...however this statement suggests the already ran trials on the third compound...