Recent content by rgdsge4455

must be the pain thing that makes one more pursued than the other

yea but if it works like the 2013 study claims and that other guy this thread was about i of thought it would of been massively advertised by now

yea cost is the other thing i dont get even if you go the most expensive option it still costs no more than 2 heavy nights out drinking for trying it for 6 months or so

Yea that's why i dont get this is not a marketed thing repeatedly hurting your self must be tough, so people would pay to have this done by someone else so they can zone out while someone accurately covers the area.

well from what i understand of the 2013 study everyone responded 0 no change 10 mild improvement 22 moderate improvement 18 marked improvement the before after photos for only 3 months are great if its all real but just cant beleave its not a thing .

Yea hopefully follica have something extra to add to mix , i just can't beleave this study was done in 2013 is cheap easy to copy and everyone's been going on about brotzu thread all day everyday for years instead, all seems to good to be true .

Hi unless im missing something no one seems to be discussing the "Int J Trichology. 2013 Jan-Mar; 5(1): 6–11. A Randomized Evaluator Blinded Study of Effect of Microneedling in Androgenetic Alopecia" that inspired the actions of the guy this thread is about or is it old news it seems impressive...