Correct me if I’m wrong, but is this not the compound;
https://www.mybiosource.com/active-protein/prolactin-antagonist/400130
If so, could it not be purchased, analysed and then reproduced cheaper?
I understand prolactin is bad for hair, but wouldn’t a prolactin agonist showing these results completely throw out the window that androgens cause hair loss?
I’m just trying to piece together how a prolactin agonist would impact androgens. and seemingly act as a growth factor?
It could happen at any moment tbh, all it takes is that one ‘eureka’ moment for a researcher to figure it out - that could happen today, 2 years from now etc.
I think people are reading ‘oil’ and assuming it’s the cookie cutter type. What the study is referring to is a highly concentrated topical of ginsenosides.
One of the interesting pathways it affects is the Shh which is was essentially the cure when Curis used it before it was scrapped.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6163201/
This seems to tick all the pathway ‘boxes’, anyone have any idea why this wouldn’t be viable / anyone tried it?
@pegasus2
Might be a stupid question given the synergistic nature of your routine, but if you had to pick only 3 compounds outside of dutasteride, micro needling and oral minoxidil to use, what would they be?