More Childless Men: Women Do Not Want Children With Low-status Men

RegenWaiting

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
461
Since one of the latest discussions in this sub-forum about the importance and meaning of having children,
I couldn't look past this article I came across yesterday.

Actually, the article is about the issue of childlessness in the country of Norway, and it would be nice to have some input from some of our more popular members on here from the same country.

Despite the fact the the article is about only one country, I feel that it depicts the situastion in a lot of countries in the western world facing similar issues.

Although the article itself isn't the greatest I have read, I just thought it was timely and mush more important that a lot of people seem to understand.

Reading these hard facts, it's hard to turn the other cheek just because it's a cruel fact. It's a fact after all. Western civilization is facing it's demons and corrupted feminism (note: not ALL feminism) may be what undermines it's leading role in human evolution. Another thing mentioned is the problem of egocentrism, which I personally believe is a much bigger issue, although it seems that it affects genders in a different manner.

More childless men: Women do not want children with low-status men

One of the reasons for increased childlessness is that women do not want children with men who have lower status than themselves.
One in six women and one in four men have not yet had children when they are 45 years old. This is an increase of 67 percent for women and 79 percent for men since 1985.

In one generation, the proportion of childless people has increased from 9 to 15 percent among 45-year-old women and from 14 to 25 percent among men of the same age. This is far more than the 5-10 percent who say they do not want to have children by their own decision.

"We know way too little about why that is the case and why it has developed like this. We want to understand the mechanism behind these changes, and we want to understand the health consequences of childlessness and the more complex forms of cohabitation and partnership between the sexes that we see today'', says Per Magnus, Senior Director of the Institute of Public Health and Fertility, Norway.

The explanation and theory of status

Researcher Thorgeir Kolshus from the Social Anthropology Department at the University of Oslo, says that one of the causes of increased childlessness is that women do not want to have children with men of lower status than themselves.
''There is only one reason that stands out. It is a question of attitude and culture as well as lag of a gender role model that we thought we had put behind us", Kolshus said to NRK. Further on he explains that the higher proportion of women with higher education adds on and reinforces to this phenomenon even more.

Kolshus also says that there are far more women than men who are voluntarily childless:

"It's interesting to see that the same proportion of men and women actually want to have children, but the difference in gap between the volunteer and non-volunteer proportion between the sexes is huge. There are almost three times more men than women who are non-voluteerely childless, and that will increase", he told NRK.

Other factors

Prof. Magnus from the same university says there can be many factors.

''Perhaps the increase in environmental pollutants has impaired biologically fertility. Maybe it's the cultural changes, since it's no longer expected that you go straight from graduation to work and establish a family. The development of equality between genders and contraception have also given women greater opportunity to decide if and when they will become pregnant'', says Magnus.

"There is also a self-realization trend in the last generation, where we Norwegians have many opportunities to do other things before we choose to have children. The fact that we have grown richer has given us plenty of opportunities to explore these selfish fantasies'', Magnus says. .

Impact on health

Magnus believes it is particularly worrisome that such a large proportion of men do not have children.

"To illustrate this: men who do not have children, or a permanent partner, have a completely different health risk than those who have family, children and, perhaps, grandchildren. This risk is statistically significant"
, he points out.

Many other societal pointers and contexts suggest that societies and individuals benefit from the fact that a large proportion are parents. Statistics from Central Statistics Agency (SSB) of Norway show that six out of ten welfare recipients are single men and women without children.

Comprehensive research

To find answers, researchers have gathered data from health records, large population surveys - like the Norwegian mother and child survey (MoBa) - and quality assured biobanks.

"Researchers with medical and social science backgrounds are included, which means that we are able to have more perspective in the research. We want to determine both the causes and consequences of increased childlessness for individuals and society as a whole", says Magnus.

The project has a time horizon of up to ten years, but findings will be published on a continuous basis, often coupled and interpreted within a contruct of meta-studies or as standalone results.
 

Emu

Established Member
Reaction score
168
Sad but true unfortunately.Women will always select the best looking higher status man to have offspring with..

At my place of employment there is a lot of low status society men and high status better looking gentlemen.

All the high status blokes are married divorced and married again having kids with both wives some of them. All the lower ones aren’t married no children.Some have to resort to a mail order bride just to have a child because western women won’t even give them a chance.

I believe western women are becoming more and more picky when choosing a partner then ever before mainly due to social media,tv and competition from other women to have it all bragging rights if you like..

So us blokes have to improve our status and improve our looks or we won’t stand a chance. Good luck gentlemen!
 

JohnsonDDG

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
4,891
First - who would want to f*** a loser?

Second - why would you want a baby with a loser?

Third - research doesn't take into account the men who do not want children - like myself - who aren't low status and could have a child and has had plenty of chance to do so.
 

Rudiger

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
6,504
@Patrick_Bateman is gonna be all over his thread, it's already right down his alley, and happening in his country? (if I recall correctly)

Anyway these numbers are very worrying. I am possibly well regarded as sceptical of some red pill thought (but I'm just sceptical of anything really) but I have always acknowledged this is an increasingly worrying issue, I just don't know HOW worrying, and this article shows it's actually becoming a real problem in some places.
 

Rudiger

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
6,504
First - who would want to f*** a loser?

Second - why would you want a baby with a loser?

Third - research doesn't take into account the men who do not want children - like myself - who aren't low status and could have a child and has had plenty of chance to do so.

But what's your definition of loser? The point is that "high status" is not being a good hard worker and having a steady income, savings that leave you capable of getting a mortgage, etc. That's most certainly not a loser, but it's not a CEO or someone high status who is in excess of money.

Being steady and reliable apparently isn't good enough, which is what most of the population is. You have to be beyond that in status, which very few men can be, obviously.
 

Exodus2011

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
5,624
First - who would want to f*** a loser?

Second - why would you want a baby with a loser?

Third - research doesn't take into account the men who do not want children - like myself - who aren't low status and could have a child and has had plenty of chance to do so.
the guys aren't even losers, they just dont make f*****g 6 figures. also the same could apply to women from us men, but we aren't horribly picky and entitled
 

Exodus2011

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
5,624
@Patrick_Bateman is gonna be all over his thread, it's already right down his alley, and happening in his country? (if I recall correctly)

Anyway these numbers are very worrying. I am possibly well regarded as sceptical of some red pill thought (but I'm just sceptical of anything really) but I have always acknowledged this is an increasingly worrying issue, I just don't know HOW worrying, and this article shows it's actually becoming a real problem in some places.
its already an issue in japan
 

JohnsonDDG

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
4,891
the guys aren't even losers, they just dont make f*****g 6 figures. also the same could apply to women from us men, but we aren't horribly picky and entitled
Low status to me means:

No job or minimum wage

No social life or social skills

Underweight/obese (or just looks bloody weird)

No equity by the age of 35 (some would say younger but Its harder for millennials)


Mid status is:

Earning above 25,000 euros or 35,000 American dollar

Having a social life

Being in somewhat okay physical shape and look

Can drive

Owns a house or is working towards it


Note: these are all mostly western standards of status (if you are from the middle east or something it may be different)
 

Exodus2011

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
5,624
Low status to me means:

No job or minimum wage

No social life or social skills

Underweight/obese (or just looks bloody weird)

No equity by the age of 35 (some would say younger but Its harder for millennials)


Mid status is:

Earning above 25,000 euros or 35,000 American dollar

Having a social life

Being in somewhat okay physical shape and look

Can drive

Owns a house or is working towards it


Note: these are all mostly western standards of status (if you are from the middle east or something it may be different)
i agree other than owning a house, thats expensive

other than that most men fulfill those requirements.
 

Rudiger

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
6,504
other than that most men fulfill those requirements.

Exactly. That's the whole reason it's worrying, of course genuinely low status guys who's lives are a complete mess are going to struggle with maintaining a real relationship (unless the girl is also a mess) so fine, it's understandable that a woman doesn't want to f*** a loser, but the whole point is that most of these guys aren't losers. Decent savings? Car? Has his own place? Mortgage approve? Those used to be vital boxes. Now it's like, brand new car? Already own a f*****g house at a young age? Professionally super successful and can go on high tier expensive holidays 4 times a year?
 

Exodus2011

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
5,624
Exactly. That's the whole reason it's worrying, of course genuinely low status guys who's lives are a complete mess are going to struggle with maintaining a real relationship (unless the girl is also a mess) so fine, it's understandable that a woman doesn't want to f*** a loser, but the whole point is that most of these guys aren't losers. Decent savings? Car? Has his own place? Mortgage approve? Those used to be vital boxes. Now it's like, brand new car? Already own a f*****g house at a young age? Professionally super successful and can go on high tier expensive holidays 4 times a year?
pretty much

which brings up the strong possibility that @JohnsonDDG might be a misandrist (euphemism-white knight). lol at trying to blame it on guys
 

Rudiger

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
6,504
pretty much

which brings up the strong possibility that @JohnsonDDG might be a misandrist (euphemism-white knight). lol at trying to blame it on guys

It was incredibly fleeting to just be like "lol men who are losers that actually expect to get laid" it was really feminazi actually. It's actually scary how people hold logic like this, it shows that people would read this and not come to a reasonable conclusion that women in society are getting more and more fussy, no, couldn't be that, instead (in some backward fucked up mindset) it HAS to be that there are more loser males than ever. It's down to lazy stupid men of course, I guess they used to work hard and not be losers, we have entire populations of males all wanking and smoking dope and playing GTA lol, makes you wonder how the global economy hasn't imploded?!

That's a reasonable conclusion if you're beyond beta cucked. That actually makes sense in some people's heads, because they have to struggle to put together any sort of reason that it's not the females fault. Sick.
 

JohnsonDDG

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
4,891
pretty much

which brings up the strong possibility that @JohnsonDDG might be a misandrist (euphemism-white knight). lol at trying to blame it on guys
Haha good luck with that.

But if a loser is a loser and I say they are a loser - am I really doing anything wrong?

I'm the same way with women - I always said I wouldn't date a low status woman - they must be in full time education or in a professional job, they must be decent looking, they must be socially functional, and they need to be good company without serious mental illnesses
 

JohnsonDDG

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
4,891
You're not "mid status" in the US if you're making $35,000 unless you're in a rural area. Median household income is closer to $60,000.

View attachment 68812

Edit: National median is $34,750, like you stated. Still, if you want to live in a desirable area it's nowhere close.
Interesting!

In the UK the average salary is around 25,000 british pounds

I guess in America if you earn below 40,000 dollars then you are low status (brutal!)
 

RegenWaiting

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
461
First - who would want to f*** a loser?

Second - why would you want a baby with a loser?

Third - research doesn't take into account the men who do not want children - like myself - who aren't low status and could have a child and has had plenty of chance to do so.

Hi man,

Your first and second - If you look closely, women today will not only define you as a loser because of your *objective* status...

Rather many females will automatically define you as such if you are ''below'' them in ANY aspect and often also if you are just not ''a step up'' for them (higher status than themselves). Would you regard a hard working ''high-schooler'' as a loser? In this article there is mention of education. Clearly more women get higher education than men nowadays (Norway atleast it seems), so if this trend continues 80% of women will mate with 20% of men?

Your third - Yes, the research does take into account the men AND the women who do not want children:

Kolshus also says that there are far more women than men who are voluntarily childless:

"It's interesting to see that the same proportion of men and women actually want to have children, but the difference in gap between the volunteer and non-volunteer proportion between the sexes is huge. There are almost three times more men than women who are non-voluteerely childless, and that will increase", he told NRK.

Personally I would neither want a child with a *loser*, but the problem here is not the AMOUNT of losers, it's clearly an abominable and skewed worldview among the females.
 

Exodus2011

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
5,624
Haha good luck with that.

But if a loser is a loser and I say they are a loser - am I really doing anything wrong?

I'm the same way with women - I always said I wouldn't date a low status woman - they must be in full time education or in a professional job, they must be decent looking, they must be socially functional, and they need to be good company without serious mental illnesses
ok then, thats good. as long as you have the same standards for women. i thought you only had these standards for men

and yes actually, if you think men have to be some retardedly successful multibillionaire to not be a loser, thats pretty much misandry and it IS wrong and IS fucked up.
 

Rudiger

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
6,504
But if a loser is a loser and I say they are a loser - am I really doing anything wrong?

giphy.gif


This is just going to get frustrating, I know it. But like I explained, and Exo, these guys aren't losers, they are normal hard working guys who have ambitions and are saving money up.

You got called misandrist because, despite the article pointing towards a completely different view, your feminazi mind twisted it to "all men are losers who can blame women?!" and I have no idea how.

Do you think a general population can suddenly just become a population of losers out of nowhere? That's a bit insane. And also you seem to be struggling to save up for a hair transplant, and you live in a poverty stricken country doing a job that isn't exactly a career, what exactly makes you not low-tier? I'd say most guys at age 30 have enough money for a hair transplant, that wouldn't really be an issue. I mean sh*t I have a 27 year old friend who only got his first actual job a year ago, and at minimum wage he's saved up several thousand already (living with parents but still, he does pay rent, and even if he wasn't I'd say he'd easily have over 10 grand in the next 3 years). And he probably wouldn't even consider himself mid-tier (at the moment anyway).

If you want to call a loser, a loser, fine (but further adds to feminazi thinking as I don't know why you think this is a purposeful exercise other than being able to hate men) but you aren't doing this, you're calling all guys losers, and saying more and more losers are out there which is why women aren't f*****g them.

It's pretty awful really.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-11-6_1-4-41.jpeg
    upload_2017-11-6_1-4-41.jpeg
    8.9 KB · Views: 285

Rudiger

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
6,504
ok then, thats good. as long as you have the same standards for women. i thought you only had these standards for men

Uh lol he's not giving the same standards for men, women have to have a solid job and not be literally insane, men are losers unless they're Elon Musk.
 
Top