- Reaction score
- 479
This has to be the dumbest logic I've seen yet. You think they're publishing and even leaking photos of 40+ dudes with no regrowth because you think they think it will market to 40+ people better than showing the supposed photos of <30 with actual regrowth? What kind of mental gymnastics do you have to go through to rationalize that in your brain.Which would also mean that men who are over 40 and have had a particularly pattern for many years would also very unlikely get regrowth . Just like a 40 year old taking finasteride for the first time .. won’t grow anything .
The reason they’re all 40 ish is likely the fact that that’s the age they’re marketing to . 90% of people in their 20’s are fortunate to not worry / notice balding .