The Cb (breezula [clascoterone]) Community Thread

[WeStayCooling]

You said you were running away from this thread. Obviously I triggered a troll here as you are back. Toughen up buttercup.

LOL youre the one who seems unable to keep my c*** out of your mouth....

sorry that you're balding aggressively and finasteride wont work for you

tell me, what is it like know you're a baldy and you will never have hair again in your life? it must be sad, huh?

you're throwing a neurotic b**ch fit because someone came in here and asked for verification...

imagine being this much a shill/repressed incel because you are bald and ugly as f***

 

[mannyFJ]

LOL youre the one who seems unable to keep my c*** out of your mouth....

sorry that you're balding aggressively and finasteride wont work for you

tell me, what is it like know you're a baldy and you will never have hair again in your life? it must be sad, huh?

you're throwing a neurotic b**ch fit because someone came in here and asked for verification...

imagine being this much a shill/repressed incel because you are bald and ugly as f***

You should change you name to "WeStayHeated" you and your buttbuddy,SomeoneHasToSayIt, are angry. Creating new nicks must be exhausting, eh? Get ban, create another, etc? What a vicious cycle.

 

[WeStayCooling]

You should change you name to "WeStayHeated" you and your buttbuddy,SomeoneHasToSayIt, are angry. Creating new nicks must be exhausting, eh? Get ban, create another, etc? What a vicious cycle.

whatever you say you chinese apologist and bootlicker

free hong kong

 

[SomeoneHasToSayIt]

Immaturity comes from one with a convoluted post. Why are you obfuscating? You been dodging retorts and questions. Answer them Mr. know it all.

It's obvious we aren't chemist and why not just say that but no, you had to add your ego/profession to the mix.

I'm honestly not sure what to say to you. The entire point of the original post was to acknowledge my ignorance and urge others to do the same and to collectively rectify it by seeking out experts and answering the important questions.

Your interpretation reveals not just your poor reading comprehension, but also your severe insecurity and adolescent, hyper-competitive mindset. I'm done wasting my words on a dull narcissist. Idiots like you are the reason hairloss forums are so toxic and useless.

 

[MedicinallyCompetent]

Is anyone here actually educated in chemistry? I asked because, as an electrical engineer, I'm often dismayed by how poorly laymen grasp even basic E&M principles, and I'm worried we might be stumbling similarly here.

Mass spectrometry is a powerful tool, but I don't believe in many cases that it can reliably differentiate isomers, much less stereoisomers (particularly when there's such limited reference data). How do we know the Chinese are being honest/competent and not simply capitalizing on the ignorance of their consumers?

Is this drug easy to synthesize? Did cassiopia (or researchers) publish a synthesis process that's straightforward and accessible? Very subtle structural differences can turn a safe and effective compound into an useless and potentially poisonous one. I really wonder if we're being thorough enough.

I'll reply to this because the cluster f*** afterwards is pure idiocy. Can you guys please take out your rage on a heavy bag or something? I don't need to swim through bullshit to get to a post that might have actual meat.

I don't know if the synthesis process was made public or not. I seem to recall in one thread somewhere that someone mentioned it was quite some time ago but I can't confirm this.

Mass spectrometry does have the ability to pull apart isomers but it's not straightforward and I doubt most places are doing it. They aren't good at identifying differences between stereoisomers but that being said I don't think that's important because usually enantiomers have the same therapeutic effects - look at citalopram and escitalopram for example.

I've addressed the toxic thing before. Mainly being that we have a compound with identical mass, and is soluble in the exact same solution as in the study. Those are both good indications that we have what we think we have. I also haven't had any side effects, and that's true for any people I've read who have tried this stuff recently.

I'm going to get some basic blood work done this week and see if there's any biochemical effects on my body.

The likelihood of it being toxic, soluble in this solution, active in the solution, and penetrative enough in high enough concentration to have an affect on us systemically is very low. It's not impossible.

But the alternatives for me are out. This is my last chance. I weighed my options and thought six months of a trial was worth the possible upsides. If you don't want to take the same risk then that's reasonable.

 

[mannyFJ]

whatever you say you chinese apologist and bootlicker

free hong kong

Came back for more to get your *** handed to you. Obviously you are a munchkin as your insults are lame.

 

[WeStayCooling]

Came back for more to get your *** handed to you. Obviously you are a munchkin as your insults are lame.

says the dude is having a coked out roid rage on a hairloss forum

go make some more threads crying about how finasteride doesn't work for you

 

[SomeoneHasToSayIt]

I'll reply to this because the cluster f*** afterwards is pure idiocy. Can you guys please take out your rage on a heavy bag or something? I don't need to swim through bullshit to get to a post that might have actual meat.

I don't know if the synthesis process was made public or not. I seem to recall in one thread somewhere that someone mentioned it was quite some time ago but I can't confirm this.

Mass spectrometry does have the ability to pull apart isomers but it's not straightforward and I doubt most places are doing it. They aren't good at identifying differences between stereoisomers but that being said I don't think that's important because usually enantiomers have the same therapeutic effects - look at citalopram and escitalopram for example.

I've addressed the toxic thing before. Mainly being that we have a compound with identical mass, and is soluble in the exact same solution as in the study. Those are both good indications that we have what we think we have. I also haven't had any side effects, and that's true for any people I've read who have tried this stuff recently.

I'm going to get some basic blood work done this week and see if there's any biochemical effects on my body.

The likelihood of it being toxic, soluble in this solution, active in the solution, and penetrative enough in high enough concentration to have an affect on us systemically is very low. It's not impossible.

But the alternatives for me are out. This is my last chance. I weighed my options and thought six months of a trial was worth the possible upsides. If you don't want to take the same risk then that's reasonable.

Thanks, this was very helpful. I think I will take the risk. I just want to do my homework first.

 

[mannyFJ]

I'm honestly not sure what to say to you. The entire point of the original post was to acknowledge my ignorance and urge others to do the same and to collectively rectify it by seeking out experts and answering the important questions.

Your interpretation reveals not just your poor reading comprehension, but also your severe insecurity and adolescent, hyper-competitive mindset. I'm done wasting my words on a dull narcissist. Idiots like you are the reason hairloss forums are so toxic and useless.

You said this multiple times. You weren't going to respond yet here you are. Answer the questions stated earlier. Stop dodging them coward. Take a look at your boyfriends immaturity @WeStayCooling or maybe it's you as you both are spewing the same false narrative. I think it's cute how you two are liking each others post.

 

[mannyFJ]

says the dude is having a coked out roid rage on a hairloss forum

go make some more threads crying about how finasteride doesn't work for you

I'm flattered you went researching all my threads. Why not comment in them too? Wait...Afraid to hijack my threads like you are doing here?

 

[WeStayCooling]

I'm flattered you went researching all my threads. Why not comment in them too? Wait...Afraid to hijack my threads like you are doing here?

naaaa

i just don't give enough of a sh*t to bump some limp-dick baldies old threads about how hairloss pills arent working for him and he's contemplating suicide

 

[mannyFJ]

Thanks, this was very helpful. I think I will take the risk. I just want to do my homework first.

You aren't intelligent enough to do a risk assessment. I won't comment further on this novice

 

[mannyFJ]

naaaa

i just don't give enough of a sh*t to bump some limp-dick baldies old threads about how hairloss pills arent working for him and he's contemplating suicide

You are losing the plot. I don't advocate suicide but if you decide to do so. You won't be missed.

 

[SomeoneHasToSayIt]

You said this multiple times. You weren't going to respond yet here you are. Answer the questions stated earlier. Stop dodging them coward. Take a look at your boyfriends immaturity @WeStayCooling or maybe it's you as you both are spewing the same false narrative. I think it's cute how you two are liking each others post.

 

[mannyFJ]

SomeoneHasToSayIt = Pseudointellectual

Answer my questions. Stop dodging them coward.

 

[Waldin]

So like... has this thread turned into facebook or???? I dont understand how two people who have never met each other can honeslty go back and forth like kids in school at lunch time arguing about things that are totally irrelevant to what the topic was created for. I just went through almost 2 pages to find almost NO conversation about what this thread was literally created, and that's to talk about the experiences and effectiveness of this compound. So can we just agree to disagree here? And let the people who are on here for a legitimate reason talk amongst themselves here? If you people want to go back and forth then there is a function called private messaging that you can do all night and day if you choose to do that.

 

[Jim lahey]

Why are hairloss forums such sh*t every thread gets derailed with morons fighting about something stupid.

 

[mannyFJ]

You had individuals who really didn’t give two fucks about using CB but had a lot to say and to derail ppl whos wanting to give it a go. I tried in past to let them be but it doesn’t work. Check out before I got into it and they were relentless. So time give them taste of their medicine.

 

[mannyFJ]

So like... has this thread turned into facebook or???? I dont understand how two people who have never met each other can honeslty go back and forth like kids in school at lunch time arguing about things that are totally irrelevant to what the topic was created for. I just went through almost 2 pages to find almost NO conversation about what this thread was literally created, and that's to talk about the experiences and effectiveness of this compound. So can we just agree to disagree here? And let the people who are on here for a legitimate reason talk amongst themselves here? If you people want to go back and forth then there is a function called private messaging that you can do all night and day if you choose to do that.

PM doesn’t work. Get real. You don’t like it. No one is forcing you read it. Drama is what you make it. These soy boys all up in their emotions. Ffs

 

[Screeech]

i use roughly 4ml to 5ml to cover the zones
mix roughly 50mg with the Polmos ethanol spirit and thats it, it dissolves right away

don't pour the whole thing at once, apply bit by bit and massage hard each time as it dries fast

concentration isn't an issue for topicals, as long as you get the sufficient amount of the drug per day - the vehicle I use dries very fast so I need to use a bit more

Interesting that you are using 50mg in 4-5ml of vehicle (1-1.25% concentration).

I have always thought that the amount of the active ingredient that you apply is what matters not the concentration but everywhere you read says it's concentration; although in saying that there is such limited information online, which is staggering, really.

I think of it as if you had a donut (vehicle) with an area of 200cm2 which contained 50 grams of sugar (active) and a donut with an area of 600cm2 which also contained 50 grams of sugar, you're still getting the same amount of active ingredient (sugar) through your body, despite the vehicle being 3 times larger in the second instance, but it doesn't seem to be the accepted school of thought; despite my experiences being to the contrary.