- Reaction score
- 224
I am not knowledgeable on AAS at all outside of Testosterone. You could search Reddit or any AAS forum for anecdotal reports. I believe Anavar should be quite hair friendly, since some women use it as well. Same for Boldenone. To be frank, I would never recommend steroids just like I would never recommend HRT for non-trans people. I am very aware on anything anti-aging, and AAS definitely do not fit into that picture. Administering exogenous T is already pushing it for me. I think the only anti-aging hormones are Pregnenolone, Progesterone, DHEA and Thyroid. The rest just ages you more rapidly (in supraphysiological doses, as always).What about anavar? Dbol? Boldenone?
There is an older thread by IdealForehead that sums up the differences pretty well. Bica's massive half life is really favorable here, because RU has a meager half life of one hour (serum). Furthermore, Bica's binding kinetics are also far superior to RU. Basically, I see no reason to use RU at all. It is not safe, and there are many safer and more effective AA's available. I believe RU got introduced by influencers some years back, and that is where the hype originated. Not that it is not effective: it is just less effective and less well researched than other options (which are also FDA approved). I see no reason to use RU and Bica concurrently. The only thing I would keep an eye on with Bica is systemic build-up due to its half-life, however, that should be avoided with once or twice weekly applications. Daro would probably be even more effective, but it is also (a lot) more expensive.You've really got me thinking about trying this. Bica seems to have a favorable molecular mass to prevent systemic absorption too. It would be VERY cheap as well. How would topical bica stack up against RU? Or would they be better to use concurrently? Thank you for your answers to all these questions, as always.