Like I have said an arrogant !
And so far you have no reason to be!
I have never said there is that kind of clinical study ,
but we do have studies which indicate ketoconazle 2% is quite effective treating male pattern baldness.
If you choose to be an ignorant its your problem.
Related to the study few...
Well ,nobody likes an arrogant too.
The treatment is recommended for four weeks only because it was tested
for this period of time , usually it is more than enough period to treat the
symptoms .
Propecia FDA trials were only 2 years ,so what you say is ,we
Should all stop using it...
Well , you got me wrong.
Again , I have respond IBM post about KCZ solution (if that’s ok by you).
I didn’t refer to oral KCZ at all.
Thats not only because the ketoconazle.
Its because Nizoral contains strong inactive
ingredients like, cocamide DEA, disodium laureth sulfosuccinate...
Please read again what I have said.
I have mentioned a topical Keto ,NOT oral!
IBM , we have small studies indicates ,
topical keto can be very useful treating male pattern baldness.
Nizoral Shampoo study:
KCZ group ,hair count was increased by 40 - 1 square cm ,
meaning 202 hairs...
Hi all,
I have made a spironolactone cream with spironolactone tabs glycerin and a neutral cream.
It turn out to be very messy and does not dry .
Is there any way to dissolve the tabs without glycerin/propelyn glycol??
Any other suggestion would be appreciated :!:
The difference between 0.2 and 1 mg finasteride
is almost the same as the difference between
Propecia (1 mg finasteride) and Avodart (0.5 mg dutasteride).
a 1-inch circle, increased by about 96 hairs with 0.5mg dutasteride (after six months).
a 1-inch circle, increased by about 77...
Thanks for the info.
Just for the record, it slams the door on the result of scalp DHT in
the propecia FDA studies.
http://www.physics.upenn.edu/facultyinf ... index.html
It means the total amount of DHT was almost tripled ,meaning the base is 0%.
This is poor speculation.
So does dutasteride inhibiting 90% of DHT is still likely in the normal range ,what is your point ?
What make you think that ,do you know what kind of
equipment they have used?
I...
That assumption can explain a lower increase of DHT ,but not 194%.
Even if all the DHT binds to SHBG (which is not true) it wont cause an increase of 194% , especially when testosterone increased by only 72%.
No we can't ,but I would think twice before using oral green tea for male pattern baldness.
I intend to ask them some questions regarding their method and kit.
SBHG binds to testosterone but not to DHT ,
so that might explain the higher T levels (if indeed T and bound T were measured together) but it doesnt explain the increase DHT levels by 194%.