Bruce Willis

dad

New Member
Reaction score
0
photo02.jpg
 

Ackers24

Member
Reaction score
0
He should shave that little bit of hair he has, but nonetheless, still a greak looking bald guy!!!
 

Maxpwr

Established Member
Reaction score
0
Wow... time's getting the better of him, he looks so frail and old. Never thought I'd say that about someone of his calibre, but then it happens to everyone, right?

You also don't see him smiling that much in photos, it makes him look a lot more vulnerable...

Still, you couldn't comment on his hair loss - without it he just wouldn't be who he is. My mum always said how attractive he was because of his hair... She'd put him right up there with Patrick Stewart and Sean Connery.
 

hair_tomorrow

Senior Member
Reaction score
5
Bruce is "one of our own".

He started losing it early (in his "Moonlighting" TV days). And once it started going - it went very quickly.

(sound familiar?)
 

metalheaddude

Senior Member
Reaction score
9
Thats what to much sex, drugs and rock and roll will do to you.
 

s.a.f

Senior Member
Reaction score
67
Yeah Tommy Lee's really a nw7! :punk:
 

s.a.f

Senior Member
Reaction score
67
hair_tomorrow said:
Bruce is "one of our own".

He started losing it early (in his "Moonlighting" TV days). And once it started going - it went very quickly.

(sound familiar?)
The difference is even as a NW3/4 he still looked good. Most people look sh*t at that stage. It did'nt go that quickly it took about 2 decades.
 

hair_tomorrow

Senior Member
Reaction score
5
s.a.f said:
[quote="hair_tomorrow":1l45x2cv]Bruce is "one of our own".

He started losing it early (in his "Moonlighting" TV days). And once it started going - it went very quickly.

(sound familiar?)
The difference is even as a NW3/4 he still looked good. Most people look $#iT at that stage. It did'nt go that quickly it took about 2 decades.[/quote:1l45x2cv]

I recall an episode of moonlighting - may have been the last season - where some NJ buddies were visiting him in Calif. Everytime a homie saw him they asked " What happened to your hair?"
 

cal

Established Member
Reaction score
2
Bruce is like 50 years old these days. He's got a right to have a few laugh-lines.

Bruce lost it gradually. It just started getting very visible relatively early in his life. He used to have some hair back in Die Hard#1 but it was already receded & on the ropes even back in his early days.



Mel Gibson is the guy who totally had it for many years and then lost it FAST.

"Maverick" and "Braveheart" were filmed in about 1993-94.
"Signs" and "We Were Soldiers" were filmed in about 2000-2001.

Hard to believe that the same guy who was like 30yo with that huge mullet in Lethal Weapon#2 suddenly went so bald barely 15 years later. male pattern baldness is just not predictable.
 

Cassin

Senior Member
Reaction score
78
Maxpwr said:
Wow... time's getting the better of him, he looks so frail and old.

I think he looks awesome for his age. Full of energy and healthy.

The guy is 52! How many people look this good in their 40's!?

As far as that little patch of hair...maybe a director wants that for something he is working on.

And look at this recent pic...

526px-BruceWillisLFDHpremiere07.jpg



Again..I think he looks amazing for his age and I hope I look as healthy and full of energy when I am his age. He has taken awesome care of himself.

You got to allow people to grow old folks!
 

ghg

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
71
cal said:
Bruce is like 50 years old these days. He's got a right to have a few laugh-lines.

Bruce lost it gradually. It just started getting very visible relatively early in his life. He used to have some hair back in Die Hard#1 but it was already receded & on the ropes even back in his early days.



Mel Gibson is the guy who totally had it for many years and then lost it FAST.

"Maverick" and "Braveheart" were filmed in about 1993-94.
"Signs" and "We Were Soldiers" were filmed in about 2000-2001.

Hard to believe that the same guy who was like 30yo with that huge mullet in Lethal Weapon#2 suddenly went so bald barely 15 years later. male pattern baldness is just not predictable.

15 years? Went fast? What the hell? I've lost most of my hair in 2-3 years. And Cassin, yeah I agree that Bruce looks great considering his age.
 

cal

Established Member
Reaction score
2
15 years is fast when the guy still had so much hair so far into his life before that.

Mel's hair would have been on the "I wish" category for us when he was 30, he was pushing 40 with still pretty decent hair, and then suddenly became so bald he was barely even transplantable by 50.
 

Surfer Ted

New Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
0
What Norwood number was Bruce Willis considered in his "Moonlighting" days?
I was thinking of trying to do my hair like that since he actually pulled it off very well in that series.
 

Cowboys fan

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
145
Bruce Willis is the same age as me 63. I have a little more hair than he does. But he looks much younger than me I hope it's just Hollywood money in his favor
 
Top