H2O
Established Member
- Reaction score
- 2
mulder said:How are GHKs different than the copper peptides he has in folligen?
It has to do with 1) the method of synthesis and 2) the specificity of the copper formulation. GHK was the copper formulation that underwent partial FDA trials and showed results equal to minoxidil 2% I believe.
Pickart left the company that owned the patents (even though he was the scientist who "discovered" GHK and the benefits to the skin and hair, etc.) to go into business for himself. So he couldn't use GHK in his new company without paying royalties to the old company. So he decided to make his own new formulation. The method he uses produces "random", non-specific copper peptides.... He has claimed effectiveness with this new formulation but no one, to my knowledge, has seen any research abstracts backing up his claims.
Basically GHK has documented effectiveness in the form of controlled FDA trials and, to date, I am not aware of any documented support of effectiveness for Pickart's new formulation.
Now that the patents have just recently expired on GHK, Pickart is free to again market products with his original GHK formulation. He has already started with skin creams and serums. A new Folligen is soon to follow as I understand.
More information can be had by doing a search on this site. Bryan and others are much more knowledgeable as far as the exact methods of formulation and details regarding the differences. They might chime in if asked to on this. A good search of the forms here should answer all of your questions.