hairschmair said:definite yes.
I mean if people took finasteride from the time they hit 18 until 60, that would be a pseudo-cure, as it would make male pattern baldness much much milder.
Obviously that's an extreme solution, but the fact that something like finasteride exists makes me believe that a 'cure' is not too far around the corner.
Jay
chewbaca said:hairschmair said:definite yes.
I mean if people took finasteride from the time they hit 18 until 60, that would be a pseudo-cure, as it would make male pattern baldness much much milder.
Obviously that's an extreme solution, but the fact that something like finasteride exists makes me believe that a 'cure' is not too far around the corner.
Jay
I think MErc should study the chemical structure of Finasteride and come up with a 2nd generation FInasteride that can inhibit DHT forever
Trent said:even a quote by a hair transplant Doctor i heard (who stands to lose a lot of money on hair transplants if HM comes out unless he switches his entire practice over to the new surgery type) said it would be 5-10 years, 10 years being, most likely, a huge overestimation. he based this on the fact that they have already produced some successful surgeries with this new method, they are just perfecting the hairline at this point. just gotta hold on for at least five more years guys. I truly believe the cure is hair multiplication, it just makes too much sense.
MidnightFlyer said:This 'five year away' stuff cracks me up. I've seriously been hearing that we're 'five years away' for at least the last 15 years. take that estimation with a grain of salt.