Do you think there will ever be a 100% cure for baldness?

jayC99

Established Member
Reaction score
4
I'm talking about a pill that would give you your hair back? I'm not talking about it coming out next year, or in 5 or even 10 years. But is it theoretically possible that a pill like this could be developed?
 

Zen2Bald

Established Member
Reaction score
0
Yes.

Gene therapy... perhaps using some sort of retrovirus.
Possible...but far away.
 

socks

Experienced Member
Reaction score
5
IMO, no.

I think the cure for hair that is already lost will be hair cloning. Having said that, in the future there might be some sort of "pill" that might be capable of permanently halting male pattern baldness... But I think that would be WAY off... I think hair cloning will come first.
 

vogs

Established Member
Reaction score
0
Balding is a natural process, just like aging. It's just a matter of time.
 

Baldie

Established Member
Reaction score
0
They'll manage to stop aging some time in the future as well....just wait and see.

The last 50 years, medical science has experienced it's best growth and inovation ever. We've only seen the tip of the iceberg.
 

GeminiX

Senior Member
Reaction score
5
I expect there will be a a proper cure/prevention in the future, there is too much money to be made from it for there not to be.

The cynic in me thinks that there will be steadily better treatments released over the years to capitalise on the market...

D
 

jimmystanley

Experienced Member
Reaction score
0
nah man...i think we are so close..think how much researchers have already learned. there is just something about the miniturization process that needs to be unlocked. I think some kind of topical will be our answer.
 

Trent

Experienced Member
Reaction score
6
even a quote by a hair transplant Doctor i heard (who stands to lose a lot of money on hair transplants if HM comes out unless he switches his entire practice over to the new surgery type) said it would be 5-10 years, 10 years being, most likely, a huge overestimation. he based this on the fact that they have already produced some successful surgeries with this new method, they are just perfecting the hairline at this point. just gotta hold on for at least five more years guys. I truly believe the cure is hair multiplication, it just makes too much sense.
 

GeminiX

Senior Member
Reaction score
5
I see where you're going... We should all get ourselves frozen for a few decades while male pattern baldness is cured, or humankind mutates and *everyone* is bald!

Cunning :D

D
 

chewbaca

Experienced Member
Reaction score
1
Its already possible now , the KEy is minoxidil, if somehow minoxidil can be taken as a pill without those dreaded side effects..i think the problem could be solved...does anyone knw if drugs like minoxidil can be reverse engineered not to have the side effects?
 

Greg1

Experienced Member
Reaction score
0
Hmmmm...I'd have to think on that one. I'm not one for the conspiracy theories so please know that I'm not headed that way in this post. However, that said, if they did come up with a cure for male pattern baldness can you imagine how much $ would be lost on the market?! Tons!!! It's my feeling though that this would be a very very good thing! I guess you can tell that I don't hold stocks in any of the hairloss treatments, eh?:)
 

Trent

Experienced Member
Reaction score
6
minoxodil is taken orally, its a vasodialator used to treat hypertension. the side effect WAS random hair growth, which is the whole reason the drug was tested topically. sorry :-(
 

hairschmair

Established Member
Reaction score
11
definite yes.

I mean if people took finasteride from the time they hit 18 until 60, that would be a pseudo-cure, as it would make male pattern baldness much much milder.

Obviously that's an extreme solution, but the fact that something like finasteride exists makes me believe that a 'cure' is not too far around the corner.

Jay
 

chewbaca

Experienced Member
Reaction score
1
hairschmair said:
definite yes.

I mean if people took finasteride from the time they hit 18 until 60, that would be a pseudo-cure, as it would make male pattern baldness much much milder.

Obviously that's an extreme solution, but the fact that something like finasteride exists makes me believe that a 'cure' is not too far around the corner.

Jay

I think MErc should study the chemical structure of Finasteride and come up with a 2nd generation FInasteride that can inhibit DHT forever
 

Bismarck

Senior Member
Reaction score
3
chewbaca said:
hairschmair said:
definite yes.

I mean if people took finasteride from the time they hit 18 until 60, that would be a pseudo-cure, as it would make male pattern baldness much much milder.

Obviously that's an extreme solution, but the fact that something like finasteride exists makes me believe that a 'cure' is not too far around the corner.

Jay

I think MErc should study the chemical structure of Finasteride and come up with a 2nd generation FInasteride that can inhibit DHT forever

Now that would be great. Actually I've developed such a treatment.
Here's a picture of the treatment (Not so safe for work) http://www.fah-q.org/archiv/bilder/waaah.jpg
 

MidnightFlyer

Established Member
Reaction score
0
Trent said:
even a quote by a hair transplant Doctor i heard (who stands to lose a lot of money on hair transplants if HM comes out unless he switches his entire practice over to the new surgery type) said it would be 5-10 years, 10 years being, most likely, a huge overestimation. he based this on the fact that they have already produced some successful surgeries with this new method, they are just perfecting the hairline at this point. just gotta hold on for at least five more years guys. I truly believe the cure is hair multiplication, it just makes too much sense.

This 'five year away' stuff cracks me up. I've seriously been hearing that we're 'five years away' for at least the last 15 years. take that estimation with a grain of salt.
 

Trent

Experienced Member
Reaction score
6
MidnightFlyer said:
This 'five year away' stuff cracks me up. I've seriously been hearing that we're 'five years away' for at least the last 15 years. take that estimation with a grain of salt.

yeah, but were they in phase II trials then? they are now. that's the thing that's keeping me positive.
 

elguapo

Experienced Member
Reaction score
0
My thoughts exactly.

Midnightflyer, I hear your point. Actually, I've been on this board coming up on 2 years now, and from day one I've been hearing "5 years". So apparently the cure is "7 years" away. =)

But have you heard a lot of hype like you hear today with actual phases of clinical studies being announced, and scientific breakthroughs like hair cloning on bald mice, etc? Not out to prove anybody wrong, I'm curious to know if you have? It would be interesting to read articles in which scientists or companies talk about a cure being just a few years away, 10 or even 5 years ago.
 
Top