Yeah, it is exploring the hormonal route to prevent further hair loss and gain regrowth, not to become trans or get "shemale".
As he said, it would prevent other males fr trying these regimens.
Again, this is not your thread to dictate. If you are against transgender topics being discussed, and a change of appearance, then create your own thread. And, since that's the case (with you not agreeing with other topics being discussed) then you are being kicked out of the discord.
Your right it's his thread and he seems to enjoy the shemale discussion.
Before I even started an hrt regimen myself one of my first comments on this thread was telling bridge that he went way too far and didn't have to take such high doses. I have been saying the same thing to him since the beginning.
wow what a burn. I was the first person on this thread to experiment with raloxefene and letrozole and I reported back that they work against gyno but only when your off estrogen completely and that the hair loss side effects are real but it regrew when i resumed Estrogel meanwhile my gyno has been much better ever since. I'm the only person on this thread to prove you can grow back a significant amount of hair on estrogen while controlling the level of gyno. What have you brought to this discussion?
Ive posted photos what more proof do you want. And most balding men will prefer to follow my path because I still look male.
It's his thread, and if he enjoys the discussion, so be it. Just because you pop-up out of the blue once every few months doesn't mean you get to dictate the route of this thread.
And, you weren't suffering with hair loss as bad as bridge; bridge is our martyr for the experimentation of HRT. There isn't a single other thread out there which has the documentation and helpfulness like bridges has regarding such a regimen.
Literally, no one cares if you used raloxifene because most of us are putting our hair first before gynecomastia. I don't see anyone else on these regimens using SERMs, especially with your methodology, so your intake wasn't necessarily required. In the meanwhile, most of us have been putting the time into discussing other anti-androgens, whilst you were gone. That sort of conversation has had the biggest influence, and had resorted to more and more people trying out bicalutamide. I have bought enough to this discussion, and that can be seen with my post history, but I don't need to brag about it. If you need to mention about what you have bought to this discussion, something is definitely up; if you were that important, people would remember what you bought to this discussion without you needing to jog our memories. All I remember you as is the person who used estradiol and cyproterone acetate, and used your results as a marker to know with what month results can be expected without minoxidil.
I don't mean to negate whatever you have provided to this thread, but the present is what is remembered most, and now you're going to be remembered as a disservice to the freedom of discussion.
And, regarding your photos, stop acting as if the photos of your progress were helpful. I could take better quality photos from an Nintendo DSI.
