- Reaction score
- 224
What do you mean by solve problems with baldness? If you are already bald, nothing is going to regrow your hair except for HRT or if you are a hyperresponder to a regular drug. I am aiming for maintenance with my treatments, which I believe is possible indefinitely by using my current protocol. Hence, comments as "this does not work" etcetera are completely useless, because work seems to be unrealistically defined as miraculous regrowth on this board. There are many research papers and anecdotal reports available on Cyclosporine, all of which report hypertrichosis as a primary side effect. Of course, there are many safety concerns with Cyclo, you have to decide for yourself whether you deem the drug safe enough and with a sufficient effect/side effect ratio. My current protocol is "done": I found all compounds and their respective concentrations to provide maintenance and slight thickening over the past six months. I will not add any other compounds in the foreseeable future; the only thing I might do is downtitrate.Hello. I want to believe that the Cyclo is able to solve the problem with baldness, but to be honest, I have not seen significant evidence of its effectiveness. How long have you been on Cyclo, are there any improvements?
If you are aiming to regain Norwoods, you should completely forget about topical regimens. The very best they will do is thicken some of your existing hairs. For me, maintenance is a home run, because I am only a NW2 and will just get a transplant down the line to bring me to NW1. I would never immerse myself in complete destruction of my male hormonal system by means of HRT, even if I were to lose ground at some other point in life. Nevertheless, what I already said remains true: my current regimen should provide lifelong maintenance against androgenic hair loss.
Apologies if this comes across as a bit harsh, but I feel like I need to stress that regrowth should not generally be expected from a treatment (especially topical treatments).
Last edited: