- Reaction score
- 3,614
what? no it doesn't. you must be thinking of synthetic progestinsprogesterone has partial agonist activity of the AR
what? no it doesn't. you must be thinking of synthetic progestinsprogesterone has partial agonist activity of the AR
"SAAs include CPA, megestrol acetate, chlormadinone acetate, and spironolactone.[73][74] These drugs are steroids, and similarly to NSAAs, act as competitive antagonists of the AR, reducing androgenic activity in the body.[75]:79 In contrast to NSAAs however, they are non-selective, also binding to other steroid hormone receptors, and exhibit a variety of other activities including progestogenic, antigonadotropic, glucocorticoid, and/or antimineralocorticoid.[73][74] In addition, they are not silent antagonists of the AR, but are rather weak partial agonists with the capacity for both antiandrogenic and androgenic actions"what? no it doesn't. you must be thinking of synthetic progestins
this is talking about progestins, not bio-identical progesterone"SAAs include CPA, megestrol acetate, chlormadinone acetate, and spironolactone.[73][74] These drugs are steroids, and similarly to NSAAs, act as competitive antagonists of the AR, reducing androgenic activity in the body.[75]:79 In contrast to NSAAs however, they are non-selective, also binding to other steroid hormone receptors, and exhibit a variety of other activities including progestogenic, antigonadotropic, glucocorticoid, and/or antimineralocorticoid.[73][74] In addition, they are not silent antagonists of the AR, but are rather weak partial agonists with the capacity for both antiandrogenic and androgenic actions"
I live every moment without preconceived notions of myselfAre you all identifying as cisgender males, or are you somewhere else on the spectrum?
Not wanting to offend anyone in the slightest, just when I read through here from time to time it seems that you may not be which would explain why you are so prepared to pursue such aggressive regimens.
Personally I would not be prepared to pursue anything that produces feminising effects so just wondering if this stuff you are talking about is out of the question for someone in my position if I was to choose to do go down this path, or should I stop looking through this thread and focus on peppermint oil and LLLT?
Everthing is in question no matter your position, there are no rules. Some of us on here are masculine and take E or receptor blockers temporary or try to take it while fighting gyno with raloxifene or surgery, others don't mind feminizing at all and just nuke the system. Weigh the pros and cons and do what makes you happier.Personally I would not be prepared to pursue anything that produces feminising effects so just wondering if this stuff you are talking about is out of the question for someone in my position
Unless you add estrogen, the feminizing effects will likely be limited to sebum reduction and slightly less body hair, as well as a chance of minor gyno. But the most noticeable effect (depending on the AA) would likely be reduced libido. And depending on your preference, that could be either a good a bad thing.Are you all identifying as cisgender males, or are you somewhere else on the spectrum?
Not wanting to offend anyone in the slightest, just when I read through here from time to time it seems that you may not be which would explain why you are so prepared to pursue such aggressive regimens.
Personally I would not be prepared to pursue anything that produces feminising effects so just wondering if this stuff you are talking about is out of the question for someone in my position if I was to choose to do go down this path, or should I stop looking through this thread and focus on peppermint oil and LLLT?
LOLIt should at least be a more potent option than peppermint oil and LLLT.
Peppermint oil and LLLT won't do a sh*t if you have aggressive hair loss. If you're Norwood 1.5/2 who is very slowly receding then might want to stay on those, else start off with Big3.Are you all identifying as cisgender males, or are you somewhere else on the spectrum?
Not wanting to offend anyone in the slightest, just when I read through here from time to time it seems that you may not be which would explain why you are so prepared to pursue such aggressive regimens.
Personally I would not be prepared to pursue anything that produces feminising effects so just wondering if this stuff you are talking about is out of the question for someone in my position if I was to choose to do go down this path, or should I stop looking through this thread and focus on peppermint oil and LLLT?
But the most noticeable effect (depending on the AA) would likely be reduced libido. And depending on your preference, that could be either a good a bad thing.
Peppermint oil and LLLT won't do a sh*t if you have aggressive hair loss. If you're Norwood 1.5/2 who is very slowly receding then might want to stay on those, else start off with Big3.
Are you all identifying as cisgender males, or are you somewhere else on the spectrum?
Not wanting to offend anyone in the slightest, just when I read through here from time to time it seems that you may not be which would explain why you are so prepared to pursue such aggressive regimens.
Personally I would not be prepared to pursue anything that produces feminising effects so just wondering if this stuff you are talking about is out of the question for someone in my position if I was to choose to do go down this path, or should I stop looking through this thread and focus on peppermint oil and LLLT?
Spironolactone seems to have relative weak AA activity among used AAs here. Also has great regrowth results under its arsenal.Yeah, I know. The peppermint oil/ LLLT comment was more of a meme than anything, lol.
I'm using clascoterone at the moment and tried finasteride before that but it did nothing.
I would be keen to try something more hardcore that gave good results if it meant there were no longstanding side effects in the event the more 'gentler' things I'm planning don't work.
As long as the erection quality came back post usage.
I also read something about inherently feminising treatments causing something like feminised skin(?).
I've found that clascoterone has stopped my hair loss seemingly entirely, so if I could take something harder for a period which regrew any loss and then go back to clascoterone for maintaining that would be very appealing.
I wonder if using stronger anti-androgens does something to the receptors which would thereafter make weaker ones impotent. That would obviously obviate that plan from being an option.
Anyway, I don't want to take up your time by doing Q&A.
I will do my own digging, just wanted to know what type of characters were engaging in this thread.
Carry on.
No Anti-androgen, not even Bicalutamide or Cypro can feminize anyone much without Estrogen.I'm non-binary, I value my feminine traits over my masculine ones, especially for aesthetics. So does my boyfriend. That's why I'm pretty happy to do this. Personally, I'd never recommend it to anyone other than a trans person, it will definitely feminize you.
No Anti-androgen, not even Bicalutamide or Cypro can feminize anyone much without Estrogen.
but Bica increases estrogenNo Anti-androgen, not even Bicalutamide or Cypro can feminize anyone much without Estrogen.
It increases estrogen because it increases testosterone. I've yet to see a study that concluded that it has direct estrogenic effects.but Bica increases estrogen
Moreover Cypro reduces both that would make the taker extremely weak.It increases estrogen because it increases testosterone. I've yet to see a study that concluded that it has direct estrogenic effects.
It increases estrogen because it increases testosterone. I've yet to see a study that concluded that it has direct estrogenic effects.
What would be de-masculinisation when bone density, voice, facial looks, fat redistribution won't happen? Boobs, nopes... any AA would do that.It increases T and E due to an increase in LH. It will lead to de-masculinisation, not direct feminising effects such as fat redistribution.