Hair Loss Product Conspiracy Theories

CrossworldPuzzler

New Member
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone. This is my first post and will probably be the first among many. First of all, I'd like to say how great it is that we all live in a time when a forum like this can exist! Secondly, thanks in advance to all the helpful advice anyone offers to me and also to all the other users on this site.

That being said, I am 35 and am experiencing hair loss. I've been experiencing it very slowly throughout my 20's and it seems that in the past 2 years it's accelerated a little bit. I've walked through the halls of depression over the years because of this and can happily say that with age comes better acceptance of who I am. Hair loss can be debilitating, it has been for me, but I have learned to become optimistic it many other areas of my life. Quite frankly, when you begin to feel sympathy for people facing other problems all over the world, your own problems can seem quite small.

Getting a little off topic here. The purpose of this topic is, since I am researching hair loss treatments (such as Rogaine) and because I am a downright paranoid somebody, I have to wonder if what I read online is not rigged. Surely, you shouldn't believe everything you read. The paranoid side of me thinks about how Rogaine (for one example) is a million-dollar business. And with any BIG business, the company is going to spend money in marketing. How do we know that Rogaine employees aren't on this very forum hyping the product? As a matter of fact, how do I know that the replies to THIS VERY TOPIC aren't crafted for perfection by Rogaine employees?

A sly marketer, for example, could post a few messages about feeling depressed about hair loss and how they can't find girlfriends. This in turn might attract followers. Then the marketer waits a little while, maybe a few months, then posts about how Rogaine is really working! They could even be really sly and claim Rogaine worked "a little bit", knowing that is all a poor soul in desperation needs to hear to make that leap and purchase the product.

How can we be sure the creators of this very forum aren't receiving some payola or kickback from Rogaine?

Did we really land on the Moon? Was 9/11 an inside job? Who killed Kennedy?

Yes, I am skeptical and paranoid. But really, who do you believe or who SHOULD you believe?

I'm not making any accusations here, just would like a few or your thoughts on this issue. (Employees of Rogaine need not respond.)
 

Lead Farmer

Established Member
Reaction score
8
Minoxidil (rogaine) has been proven countless times before, it didn't do much for me but I know it has for others. There are undoubtedly marketers around but there is also proper scientific research and real world experience.

The other thing is the company that produces rogaine wants their product to work to some extent. Why? Because minoxidil requires life maintenance. If you can give a customer great results from the first couple of uses you've just found yourself a lifetime buyer. If you can't do that (like with me for example) then you've lost yourself a potentially constant source of profit. That's why it's in their best interests to make a product that works well (without being permanent of course! ;)).
 

CrossworldPuzzler

New Member
Reaction score
0
Lead Farmer, that is a good point about wanting the product to work to keep a customer for life. But of course, that brings up a whole other conspiracy: What if there is a PERMANENT cure, but Rogaine is looking for a cure which needs to be used over the course of a lifetime?

Like the old theory that there may already be a cure for cancer, but the revenue for treating it in hospitals is too great.

Or the fact that we COULD produce electric cars, but the there is too much money to be made in oil sales.

Or the fact that Apple could have put out an iPhone with today's capabilities 5 years ago, but it made them more money to slowly leak out the advanced features.

The conspiracy theorist in me can't help by think it might be all about the money.

- - - Updated - - -

And the other comparison would be the author of a book who, under aliases, gives himself 5 star ratings and feedback on Amazon.com.
 

Lead Farmer

Established Member
Reaction score
8
There very well could be a cure out there or something that permanently halts hairloss without the need for maintenance. As you are implying it won't be anywhere near as profitable as current treatments if they went down that route. BUT if a single corporation can patent that potential cure for their own exclusive use then they can monopolise the ENTIRE industry.
 

zeroes

Experienced Member
Reaction score
22
A one of cure is worth billions no way is any company stupid enough not to release it now.
 
B

Beingbaldsucksass

Guest
Conspiracy my ***, who gives a ****, I just want tO keep my hair, if they want to market it on forums it's thier problem
 

JDW

Experienced Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
15
A one of cure is worth billions no way is any company stupid enough not to release it now.

yes I agree with this, why would people hold back a proper cure. Every balding man on the country would take it and the profits/stock price/invest ability of that pharmaceutical would sky rocket
 

Armando Jose

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
1,004
There is not cure for common baldness, the best goal could be prevention....
I have spent decades thinking and learning about it.
 

Cassin

Senior Member
Reaction score
78
sheesh....

- - - Updated - - -

Or the fact that we COULD produce electric cars, but the there is too much money to be made in oil sales.


No that's not accurate. There is a ton of money to be made in an electric car. Bu the problem is making it affordable for the end consumer. Who is going to pay 100,000k for a car that has terrible torque and can't go over 40? The new Tesla is proof that this gap is narrowing.

Or the fact that Apple could have put out an iPhone with today's capabilities 5 years ago, but it made them more money to slowly leak out the advanced features.

No....no....no.....

Japan. Japan is the testing ground for all such things. It's easy to throw out technology but you need you figure out what people will pay for. There is no gain in holding back technology. You can only lose but releasing the wrong kind and confusing people. One issue that help back the iphone was the worry about developers and their desire to make apps.

The conspiracy theorist in me can't help by think it might be all about the money.
What's wrong with money? Money isn't evil. Do you work for free?

- - - Updated - - -

And the other comparison would be the author of a book who, under aliases, gives himself 5 star ratings and feedback on Amazon.com.
Another awful example. Such authors get killed for doing things like that. Preview chapters eliminate that being useful anyway.
 

Kirby

Established Member
Reaction score
38
It's not plausible that an actual cure is being 'held back' to milk consumers for Propecia and Regaine sales. Those treatments are only slightly better than useless, only work for at best a decade, don't do anything for the already bald, and are inconvenient for most men, being daily use. Think how many men don't attempt to treat male pattern baldness as the treatments that exist now are so crap.
 

WarLord

Established Member
Reaction score
13
Hello everyone. This is my first post and will probably be the first among many. First of all, I'd like to say how great it is that we all live in a time when a forum like this can exist! Secondly, thanks in advance to all the helpful advice anyone offers to me and also to all the other users on this site.

That being said, I am 35 and am experiencing hair loss. I've been experiencing it very slowly throughout my 20's and it seems that in the past 2 years it's accelerated a little bit. I've walked through the halls of depression over the years because of this and can happily say that with age comes better acceptance of who I am. Hair loss can be debilitating, it has been for me, but I have learned to become optimistic it many other areas of my life. Quite frankly, when you begin to feel sympathy for people facing other problems all over the world, your own problems can seem quite small.

Getting a little off topic here. The purpose of this topic is, since I am researching hair loss treatments (such as Rogaine) and because I am a downright paranoid somebody, I have to wonder if what I read online is not rigged. Surely, you shouldn't believe everything you read. The paranoid side of me thinks about how Rogaine (for one example) is a million-dollar business. And with any BIG business, the company is going to spend money in marketing. How do we know that Rogaine employees aren't on this very forum hyping the product? As a matter of fact, how do I know that the replies to THIS VERY TOPIC aren't crafted for perfection by Rogaine employees?

A sly marketer, for example, could post a few messages about feeling depressed about hair loss and how they can't find girlfriends. This in turn might attract followers. Then the marketer waits a little while, maybe a few months, then posts about how Rogaine is really working! They could even be really sly and claim Rogaine worked "a little bit", knowing that is all a poor soul in desperation needs to hear to make that leap and purchase the product.

How can we be sure the creators of this very forum aren't receiving some payola or kickback from Rogaine?

Did we really land on the Moon? Was 9/11 an inside job? Who killed Kennedy?

Yes, I am skeptical and paranoid. But really, who do you believe or who SHOULD you believe?

I'm not making any accusations here, just would like a few or your thoughts on this issue. (Employees of Rogaine need not respond.)

And what were you doing during the whole time? It always amazes me, when I read posts of people, who have barely any hair left on their head, and they suddenly start to look for some treatment. The current arsenal of treatments serves mainly for maintenance. If you are already half-bald, you can't expect miracles, not speaking about minoxidil alone. However, the combination of minoxidil with anti-androgens like finasteride sometimes showed fantastic results.
 

gmonasco

New Member
Reaction score
0
Like the old theory that there may already be a cure for cancer, but the revenue for treating it in hospitals is too great.

Medical practitioners garner comparable or greater revenues for treating heart disease, trauma, and mental disorders than for treating cancer, so logically there should be more money in curing the cancer patients so they can live on to require the other higher-grossing services.
 
Top