47thin said:From Science Daily-
Saw palmetto, an herbal extract commonly taken to improve urinary symptoms in men with enlargement of the prostate gland, is no more effective than a placebo, according to a new study.
See Also:
Health & Medicine
* Men's Health
* Dietary Supplement
* Alternative Medicine
Plants & Animals
* Mice
* New Species
* Food
Reference
* Double blind
* Urology
* Baldness treatments
* Clinical trial
The year-long, double-blind study of 225 men was led by Stephen Bent, MD, a staff physician at the San Francisco VA Medical Center, and Andrew Avins, MD, MPH, of the Northern California Kaiser Permanente Division of Research.
The results are published in the February 9, 2006 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine.
In their study, the researchers randomly assigned patients with enlargement of the prostate, also known as or benign prostate hyperplasia or BPH, to take either saw palmetto or a placebo twice a day for one year. Subjects returned at regular intervals to be assessed for symptoms and side effects. Symptoms were assessed according to a standard symptom score for BPH and objective measures of urinary function.
"If you look at the change in symptoms over time between the two groups, it was almost identical," reports Bent, who is also an assistant professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco. "There was no statistically significant difference at any time point during the study."
The researchers also looked at subgroups of patients -- those with more and less severe symptoms and those with larger and smaller prostates -- and found no difference in any of the subgroups between the herbal extract and placebo.
"The results of this study clearly do not support a strong clinical benefit of saw palmetto for BPH," concludes Bent. "However, whether other doses, formulations, or patient populations might respond differently is unknown."
The researchers estimate that saw palmetto is used by over two million men in the United States for treatment of BPH, which is said by the National Institutes of Health to affect more than 50 percent of men over 60 and upwards of 90 percent of men over 70.
rcom440 said:"Not the biggest study ever done, but one certainly gives me more confidence in beta sitosterol. And then consider the best results with beta sitosterol comes from over 12 months of use, yet 60% of the test subjects noticed an improvement after just 4 months. At the worst it may be enough to stop any more hair shed at the best I may be able to spark new life into hair follicles that were nearly dead."
http://www.hairlossbuddy.com/23/beta-sitosterol/
baller234 said:Doesn't the hair of mice behave more like human body hair than human scalp hair?
Cassin said:Dr. Pickart
Posted 02 January 2010 09:36 PM
The copper peptides should also inhibit the 5-ar and they should override any possible problems with Beta-S.
You can look at biochemical pathways until you go insane, but the real answer is what happens in the mammals. And in this case, the Beta-S look like a help for hair growth.
baller234 said:Bryan what is your opinion about using Beta-sitosterol in a topical?