Both sound like overpriced scams and probably don't work, but I need to slow down excessive shedding. Need to make a decision today. Which one gets your vote and why?
If I only had those two treatments as options and had to chose one of them, I would pick Revivogen simply because there is more valid science behind it.
With that said, I think they both are overpriced as well, and wouldn't expect much from either.
Currently Lee's XANDROX 5 percent once or twice, tricomin 4-5 times a week, nizoral 2 percent, spironolactone 5 times a week , PTO shampoo, T-GEL, Emu oil. Tried finasteride 1 year and quit due to it being worthless for my hairloss. So I have one vote for revivogen? Anyone else?
I personally have more faith in Prox-n than revivogen, but that's just me. The prescription version has maintained my hair for a while now. Search and you'll see some photos of Bryan, who maintained and regrew his hair over 2 years with nothing by prox-n.
Although I think a more valid comparison anyways would be between Spectral DNC and PROX-N I would definitely pick Prox-N over Revivogen. I would go with Rogaine Foam over Revivogen since it doesn't have any proven hair growth ingredients. I am going with Spectral DNC over all of them because it doesn't cost an arm and a leg like the Prox and it regrows hair with a number of proven ingredients.