DammitLetMeIn said:Increasing SHBG WON'T cause impotence. I see it as a potentially viable alternative to inhibiting 5ar.
Bryan said:But I think a very overlooked issue is exactly HOW you increase SHBG. Depending on how that's done, it may well cause a compensatory increase in androgen production, as Maddoc23 pointed out.
Bryan
docj077 said:Everyone has a set point that their body exists at and is comfortable with when it comes to the concentration of testosterone in the body. .
docj077 said:Your only alternative to prevent the formation of potent androgens like DHT through 5AR inhibition. Any other treatment will cause feminization or your body will simply compensate with a lack of negative feedback as that is what it's designed to do. Increasing SHBG is not the answer in this case. You will increase SHBG, but will also increase testosterone in a similar manner as their concentrations go hand in hand in the long run. Short term effects will be a testosterone decrease, but without pituitary inhibition your body will upregulate androgen synthesis.
DammitLetMeIn said:docj077 said:Your only alternative to prevent the formation of potent androgens like DHT through 5AR inhibition. Any other treatment will cause feminization or your body will simply compensate with a lack of negative feedback as that is what it's designed to do. Increasing SHBG is not the answer in this case. You will increase SHBG, but will also increase testosterone in a similar manner as their concentrations go hand in hand in the long run. Short term effects will be a testosterone decrease, but without pituitary inhibition your body will upregulate androgen synthesis.
Ok, I have a question.
Given that insulin resistance is an affliction. Do you believe that the body's correct and true level of SHBG will be in evidence when insulin levels are low (i.e. no insulin resistance)?
(taking into consideration that SHBG is lowered as insulin rises)
docj077 said:However, I'd probably be more capable of accepting what you're saying if you found a study that says that tightly controlled type I diabetics that take only the appropriate levels of insulin are less prone to male pattern baldness when genetically susceptible. No insulin through autoimmune destruction of the pancreas should prove rather beneficial as that would mean that no insulin-mediated downregulation of SHBG would take place. You find a population that proves the above statement and you might be taking business.
JamesVegas said:I want desperately to increase my SHBG so that my system can return itself to normal.
I'm having a fasting glucose/insulin test done very soon to determine wether or not I have an insulin problem.
However, if my problem is insulin -- what the hell do I do about it? I already eat only low GI foods -- lean meat, vetables, 2 low GI fruits per day (max), oatmeal in the morning, and my fats come from coconut oil, olive oil, and fish oil. No sugars at all here, 'cept the two fruits (kiwi, avocado.)