Indications of high DHT-levels?

Bryan

Senior Member
Staff member
Reaction score
42
pbx said:
Oh - by the way - my fathers grandfather on his mothers side is ~95 years old and NW0...

You mean NW1? There's no such thing as a "NW0".

Bryan
 

pbz

Established Member
Reaction score
0
NW0 has been referred to as "not being on the Norwood-scale".
 

Jaygee

Established Member
Reaction score
0
pbx: Good God, you sound exactly like me. Pretty hairy chest (ugh) very hairy limbs (ugh), and a few random hairs on shoulders and back. (double ugh). I have always hated body hair (just a personal hangup), and now I have a new reason to hate it, apparently. I really hope my DHT levels are not so high that finasteride won't help. Is that basically the idea that's being tossed around?

I'm a diffuser with a Norwood 2 left temple and a Norwood 2.2 right temple.
 

Jaygee

Established Member
Reaction score
0
pbx: Good God, you sound exactly like me. Pretty hairy chest (ugh) very hairy limbs (ugh), and a few random hairs on shoulders and back. (double ugh). I have always hated body hair (just a personal hangup), and now I have a new reason to hate it, apparently. I really hope my DHT levels are not so high that finasteride won't help. Is that basically the idea that's being tossed around?

I'm a diffuser with a Norwood 2 left temple and a Norwood 2.2 right temple.
 

Trent

Experienced Member
Reaction score
6
based on one of GourmetStyleWellness's "new research" articles that he posted, some people lose hair for other reasons other than DHT (i.e. propecia non responders), so one might think that a hairy body means high DHT, which means DHT is probably the cause of your hairloss, which means propecia would work well for you :)

i have devised a simple formula, based on my theory for chances of you going bald early.

BALD = (C + (B + 10/K) + A^3) * (2R)^2

C = # of chest hairs ; B = # of back hairs; K = the age at which you began seeing your back hair; A = arm hair on the shoulder area;
R = number of male relatives that you know of (only including grandfather, father, brothers, cousins, uncles) that have at least significant hairloss (NW4) or are thinning very early (before 25) divided by the number that aren't.


any number over 50 and you have a 68.9 percent chance of going bald before the age of 34.

:) Edit: if you like dudes, then divide that number by eight. you are NOT likely to go bald.
 

Bryan

Senior Member
Staff member
Reaction score
42
pbx said:
NW0 has been referred to as "not being on the Norwood-scale".

No kidding. But what's your point?

Bryan
 

pbz

Established Member
Reaction score
0
Bryan said:
pbx said:
NW0 has been referred to as "not being on the Norwood-scale".

No kidding. But what's your point?

Bryan

No changes in hairline whatsoever. If that is NW1, I won't argue against it. :S

Jayge: I kind of share Trents opinions and theories. I think low levels of DHT may indicate another reason for the hairloss, and maybe even make a person more sensitive to side-effects, since the already low DHT-levels would be reduced even more(?). I'm not educated in this field in any way, so I shouldn't even be saying things like that. o_O
 

pbz

Established Member
Reaction score
0
I read something in a thread on this board about some people reacting to the treatment with producing more DHT. Maybe this applies to those who are not affected by high DHT-levels to begin with.

But then again - I don't know anything at all. o_O
 

Bryan

Senior Member
Staff member
Reaction score
42
pbx said:
I read something in a thread on this board about some people reacting to the treatment with producing more DHT.

Nope. I've never heard of 5a-reductase inhibitors causing an INCREASE in DHT production! :wink:

Bryan
 
Top