You forgot 2nd part:
Even with regard to this aspect, vasodilatation is characteristic of DGLA, among its many other important qualities; But would this beneficial effect be reduced over time due to a possible 'habit' of the circulatory system being continuously stimulated by causes outside the system? In other words, according to your experiments, is the continuity of efficacy of DGLA over the long term, in all the diseases of the treated hair, desirable?
There is no addiction to DGLA.
From her initial experiments on Androgenetic Alopecia and her statements, does she feel that the lotion is the only component of a therapy without being accompanied by other drugs? There are so many patients, including those who write, who suffer from side effects that are heavily affected by current treatments, and would like to abandon them in favor of your product. Could they do so with relative security on the outcome?
In patients with Androgenetic Alopecia, the results after 6 months of therapy were excellent.
On subjects who do not suffer from side effects or who want to be more careful of Androgenetics, it may be useful to accompany the lotion, according to your opinion, also a 5-alpha reductase inhibitor (Finasteride, Dutasteride, Expr. The substantial abatement of DHT by these drugs could be of further help to the power of the lotion, also given the different mechanism of fighting DHT itself between S-Equolo and Finasteride?
I would never advise those vascular surgeons.
Against this latest topic, in one of your interviews, you say that the fall of the fall was the simplest goal to get. By virtue of this, at least on Androgenetics, would it be too ambiguous to expect total (or near) maintenance of capillary wealth from the lotion, even over the long term? How does your remedy, from its initial experiments, in preventing the frontal artery due to Androgenetic Alopecia?
The results that tell us that logically the positive response varies from subject to subject and depends on how long the Androgenetic Alopecia has started
7- At the SITRI meeting in November he presented the amazing results on Areata. Are your experiments in this subject terminated or need to be continued? According to you, is the fact that the lotion has proved to be so effective on Areata is already a security for its future marketing? Could we think of seeing her one day on the shelves, regardless of the results of the pharmaceutical company's Androgenetic Alopecia experiments?
In your previous interviews, he stated that there were, in your view, no apparent reasons for preventing the marketing of the remedy. In the light of the latest official statement of the pharmaceutical firm, do you personally have the same opinion as before? If not, why?
The pharmaceutical company, which is very serious, must carry out many tests before placing any product on the market. We ran a series of tests and studied the stability of the product over time. If manufactured today must be valid for many months. Given the data we have, I think the pharmaceutical company will put it on the market fairly soon.
The problem is that whoever starts using the lotion will have to use it always, because the lotion prevents the effects of pathological stimuli, but does not eliminate it.
How can it stop hair from falling, but whether or not it stops Androgenetic Alopecia depends on the person? Or it is just another GT nonsense shenanigans?