Exactly. They banned Christian Miller 'cos he was just disliking posts and didnt ban this piece of sh*t wishing cancer toto other users,... really seems there is a bit ofof discrimination in this forum between those pro brotzue and thosea against. Awkawrd. What a sahme, guess this forum ain't no different from.the.italian bellicapelli joke.
Italian Hair Loss Lotion To Hit The Market In 2016
- Thread starter paleocapa89
- Start date
Exactly. They banned Christian Miller 'cos he was just disliking posts and didnt ban this piece of sh*t wishing cancer toto other users,... really seems there is a bit ofof discrimination in this forum between those pro brotzue and thosea against. Awkawrd. What a sahme, guess this forum ain't no different from.the.italian bellicapelli joke.
- Reaction score
- 223
They didn't ban me for disliking posts, but for the posts I wrote about the Turkish people.
Even though I don't really regret writing those posts, I totally accept the rationale behind my getting banned.
If it were for my disliking, I'd be really appalled by the presumed discrimination and bias in this forum
The explanation I was given luckily does NOT point to that direction.
Still, wishing cancer upon other users should be a red flag, altogether. Those who posted such hateful comments should have been temporarily banned already.
Mate, why are you consistently posting in this thread if you think the lotion is bullshit? what is the f*****g point? I'm not defending the other guy's actions, but it's absolutely ridiculous you are still posting in here. You don't think its legit. FINE. Then shut up about it for god's sake. It's beyond annoying
He has no friends an needs our attention. I've told these trolls many times to shut their fkcing mouths but they are like parasites and got banned over and over on other websites. They are like piece of sh*t and they dont3get it that nobody gives a fkck on their opinion.
Source?
Dermaroller, follicept, reboost, brotzu.
Lactate is waiting.So many choices. Frankly With so many great optionsOnly lazy people are bald now who are pessimistic. There mind is so negative that it induce negative side effects on propecia and minoxidil. Also there pessimism cancels all the great effects of dermarolling, foreskin uses etc etc.
Atleast put the hair system on. As Noah and his comrades will tell u that it does not itch, hardly 1 hour weekly maintenance, impossible to detect, no problem with sun, sweating, swimming, bungee jumping. What are you lazy bums doing man?
Great hopes frm tsuji too. In my native language tsuji means swollen a**h**. It has to work. It's a sign.
Lactate is waiting.So many choices. Frankly With so many great optionsOnly lazy people are bald now who are pessimistic. There mind is so negative that it induce negative side effects on propecia and minoxidil. Also there pessimism cancels all the great effects of dermarolling, foreskin uses etc etc.
Atleast put the hair system on. As Noah and his comrades will tell u that it does not itch, hardly 1 hour weekly maintenance, impossible to detect, no problem with sun, sweating, swimming, bungee jumping. What are you lazy bums doing man?
Great hopes frm tsuji too. In my native language tsuji means swollen a**h**. It has to work. It's a sign.
Last edited:
shookwun
Senior Member
- Reaction score
- 6,093
Y So negative shook. You don't know how advance the wig tech has become in last 10 years. Self cooling, automatic color correction, sweat resistant, no itching. apply it and forget it.
But you are so negative minded person that nothing works for you.
But you are so negative minded person that nothing works for you.
- Reaction score
- 190
Glad they cleared that up and are still developing the product! Only about 4 months to 2018! Hopefully we get an update in January
This email is basically a kind way of telling people to stfu
shookwun
Senior Member
- Reaction score
- 6,093
FCKW36
Experienced Member
- Reaction score
- 622
At least it was a good answer including the information which they were asked for.
I would like to know what all the members who are more negativ towards this Lotion respectively those who say it is not going to work, think about the company.
I still think it is a trustable company. Not because I think they are good people or they want to help others but just because they want to generate money. Other company's in this business (hairloss) like those Turkish clowns, are mostly pretty small they have just one product so if this one product is not going to work or they don't sell enough, they are fucked. The outcome is, that they even sell scam just to generate at least a little bit of money. They try to promote it, and fake their results. Looking at the facts we know for sure, fidia is doing nothing like that. They just gave one big update, because the hype became to much. They never gave promises, they don't update their facebook/Twitter every hour and they already need nearly 2 years to release the product (I don't think that a delay is an argument that it is not a snake oil, but 2 years is a pretty long time just to prepare the sale of a scam).
All in all in my opinion fidia seems like a company that doesn't want to lose their reputation or at least a company that can't afford to release a scam. Even if they would release a snake oil and everyone in this forum (thousands or maybe millions) would buy it first, the image damage would overcome the profit from the scam.
We got that email answer where they said they are still working on the product, if they already knew that this is not going to work (and after 2 years I think they should know this) they would release an update to limitate the damage on their reputation.
This is just my thinking, based on the facts I/we got without those facts we don't know for sure (beps, spiga and even brotzu because I don't trust them either).
So what do U think about fidia itself (sangan, pithikas etc) ?
P.S.: the fact that they sold a scam decades ago is not an argument against the company I think. For example: In the last century even doctors promoted to eat tons of butter, on the ground that your blood is going to flow better(because of the oil)
I still think it is a trustable company. Not because I think they are good people or they want to help others but just because they want to generate money. Other company's in this business (hairloss) like those Turkish clowns, are mostly pretty small they have just one product so if this one product is not going to work or they don't sell enough, they are fucked. The outcome is, that they even sell scam just to generate at least a little bit of money. They try to promote it, and fake their results. Looking at the facts we know for sure, fidia is doing nothing like that. They just gave one big update, because the hype became to much. They never gave promises, they don't update their facebook/Twitter every hour and they already need nearly 2 years to release the product (I don't think that a delay is an argument that it is not a snake oil, but 2 years is a pretty long time just to prepare the sale of a scam).
All in all in my opinion fidia seems like a company that doesn't want to lose their reputation or at least a company that can't afford to release a scam. Even if they would release a snake oil and everyone in this forum (thousands or maybe millions) would buy it first, the image damage would overcome the profit from the scam.
We got that email answer where they said they are still working on the product, if they already knew that this is not going to work (and after 2 years I think they should know this) they would release an update to limitate the damage on their reputation.
This is just my thinking, based on the facts I/we got without those facts we don't know for sure (beps, spiga and even brotzu because I don't trust them either).
So what do U think about fidia itself (sangan, pithikas etc) ?
P.S.: the fact that they sold a scam decades ago is not an argument against the company I think. For example: In the last century even doctors promoted to eat tons of butter, on the ground that your blood is going to flow better(because of the oil)
I would like to know what all the members who are more negativ towards this Lotion respectively those who say it is not going to work, think about the company.
I still think it is a trustable company. Not because I think they are good people or they want to help others but just because they want to generate money. Other company's in this business (hairloss) like those Turkish clowns, are mostly pretty small they have just one product so if this one product is not going to work or they don't sell enough, they are fucked. The outcome is, that they even sell scam just to generate at least a little bit of money. They try to promote it, and fake their results. Looking at the facts we know for sure, fidia is doing nothing like that. They just gave one big update, because the hype became to much. They never gave promises, they don't update their facebook/Twitter every hour and they already need nearly 2 years to release the product (I don't think that a delay is an argument that it is not a snake oil, but 2 years is a pretty long time just to prepare the sale of a scam).
All in all in my opinion fidia seems like a company that doesn't want to lose their reputation or at least a company that can't afford to release a scam. Even if they would release a snake oil and everyone in this forum (thousands or maybe millions) would buy it first, the image damage would overcome the profit from the scam.
We got that email answer where they said they are still working on the product, if they already knew that this is not going to work (and after 2 years I think they should know this) they would release an update to limitate the damage on their reputation.
This is just my thinking, based on the facts I/we got without those facts we don't know for sure (beps, spiga and even brotzu because I don't trust them either).
So what do U think about fidia itself (sangan, pithikas etc) ?
P.S.: the fact that they sold a scam decades ago is not an argument against the company I think. For example: In the last century even doctors promoted to eat tons of butter, on the ground that your blood is going to flow better(because of the oil)
... You really ask for bitchkas and Sangays opinion? Are u fkcing serious?
I think you are losing not only hair but also brain cells. Everybody who takes these triple G clowns serious is just out of mind.
MrJolly16
Experienced Member
- Reaction score
- 602
http://www.ieson.com/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=66178&whichpage=239
Fagiolo92
Il ritiro dell'istanza, è una cosa di pochissimo conto, un'inezia che quasi certamente non rinviene la propria cagione in scelte di tipo strategico, ma credo che scaturisca da fatti di natura meramente procedimentale. Considerate che questo, è una sorta di sub-procedimento che si svolge nell'ambito di un procedimento internazionale disciplinato da normative talmente vaste che io ho paura anche solo di consultare. Se ne consideriamo la complessità, va da sé che alla base della mancata estensione del brevetto a quei paesi, potrebbe esserci qualsiasi motivo. A dire il vero, penso che non sia stata neppure una scelta della società, ma dello studio legale mandatario. E ciò, peraltro, non significa necessariamente che la società rinuncerà a qualsiasi tutela in quei paesi, ma semplicemente che non si avvarrà della procedura centralizzata (in estensione), potendo comunque richiedere separatamente i brevetti nazionali dei rispettivi paesi. Quasi inutile dire che Fidia è libera di vendere anche in paesi presso cui non ha conseguito alcun tipo di tutela sull'invenzione (ivi compresa quella brevettuale), la qual cosa però non le consentirebbe di esperire i rimedi a difesa della privativa industriale (e.c. azione di contraffazione, sequestro, distruzione, ecc.) nei confronti di chi sfruttasse economicamente l'invenzione non brevettata (fermo restando che in diversi ordinamenti - incluso il nostro - anche l'invenzione non brevettata riceve una seppur limitata tutela).
In definitiva, escluderei che sia l'indice rivelatore di una strategia commerciale, ma concediamoci il beneficio del dubbio...
Per rispondere all'utente Heynz: siamo assolutamente lontani da un diritto commerciale europeo uniforme, vieppiù da un diritto internazionale. Per quanto pertiene al brevetto, qualche passo in avanti è stato fatto, ma limitatamente alle procedure. Si prevedono procedure centralizzate (domanda unica, deposito unico, controllo unico, ecc.) al termine dei quali vengono rilasciati tanti brevetti quanti sono i paesi aderenti alla convenzione istitutiva dell'EPorg, ed ogni brevetto soggiace alla - diversa - legislazione nazionale. Parliamo di circa 150 paesi diversi, con altrettante legislazioni. Un primo importante traguardo sarà raggiunto quando entrerà in vigore il brevetto comunitario contemplato dalla Convenzione del Lussemburgo (unica la procedura, unica la disciplina legislativa in tutti gli stati) ma perché ciò sia possibile bisognerà attendere la ratifica di tutti gli stati membri dell'UE. Può sembrare poco, ma giuridicamente segnerebbe una svolta importantissima.
Insomma attualmente un "brevetto internazionale" non esiste e forse non esisterà per almeno cinquant'anni.
Detto questo, io alcune scelte della società continuo a non spiegarmele e conseguentemente a non condividerle.
Saluti.
The withdrawal of the instance is a very small thing, an inheritance that almost certainly does not find its cause in strategic choices, but I think it derives from purely procedural nature. Consider this, it is a kind of sub-procedure that takes place in an international procedure governed by so extensive norms that I'm afraid even just to consult. Considering the complexity, it goes without saying that the basis for the lack of patent extension to those countries could be any reason. Actually, I think it was not even a choice of the company, but of the law firm. This, however, does not necessarily mean that the society will renounce any protection in those countries, but simply will not rely on the centralized (extending) procedure, yet may require separate national patents from their respective countries. It is almost useless to say that Fidia is free to sell even in countries where it has not received any protection on the invention (including patent rights), but that would not allow it to take remedies to defend industrial privatization (ec action Counterfeiting, seizure, destruction, etc.) to those who exploit the unpatented invention economically (provided that the patented invention does receive a limited protection even in various systems - including ours).
Ultimately, I would rule out that it is the index that reveals a commercial strategy, but allow the benefit of the doubt ...
To answer the user Heynz: we are absolutely far from a uniform European commercial law, more than an international law. As far as the patent is concerned, some steps forward have been made but limited to the procedures. Centralized procedures are envisaged (single application, single deposit, single control, etc.) at the end of which so many patents are issued, as are the countries that accede to the EPorg Convention, and each patent is subject to different national legislation. We are talking about 150 different countries, with as many laws. A first important milestone will be achieved when the Community patent covered by the Luxembourg Convention (the only procedure, the only legislative framework in all countries) will come into force, but because it is possible to wait for the ratification of all EU member states. It may seem small, but legally it would mark a very important turn.
So now an "international patent" does not exist and maybe it will not exist for at least fifty years.
That being said, I some choices of the company continue to not explain and consequently not to share them.
Greetings.
Fagiolo92
Il ritiro dell'istanza, è una cosa di pochissimo conto, un'inezia che quasi certamente non rinviene la propria cagione in scelte di tipo strategico, ma credo che scaturisca da fatti di natura meramente procedimentale. Considerate che questo, è una sorta di sub-procedimento che si svolge nell'ambito di un procedimento internazionale disciplinato da normative talmente vaste che io ho paura anche solo di consultare. Se ne consideriamo la complessità, va da sé che alla base della mancata estensione del brevetto a quei paesi, potrebbe esserci qualsiasi motivo. A dire il vero, penso che non sia stata neppure una scelta della società, ma dello studio legale mandatario. E ciò, peraltro, non significa necessariamente che la società rinuncerà a qualsiasi tutela in quei paesi, ma semplicemente che non si avvarrà della procedura centralizzata (in estensione), potendo comunque richiedere separatamente i brevetti nazionali dei rispettivi paesi. Quasi inutile dire che Fidia è libera di vendere anche in paesi presso cui non ha conseguito alcun tipo di tutela sull'invenzione (ivi compresa quella brevettuale), la qual cosa però non le consentirebbe di esperire i rimedi a difesa della privativa industriale (e.c. azione di contraffazione, sequestro, distruzione, ecc.) nei confronti di chi sfruttasse economicamente l'invenzione non brevettata (fermo restando che in diversi ordinamenti - incluso il nostro - anche l'invenzione non brevettata riceve una seppur limitata tutela).
In definitiva, escluderei che sia l'indice rivelatore di una strategia commerciale, ma concediamoci il beneficio del dubbio...
Per rispondere all'utente Heynz: siamo assolutamente lontani da un diritto commerciale europeo uniforme, vieppiù da un diritto internazionale. Per quanto pertiene al brevetto, qualche passo in avanti è stato fatto, ma limitatamente alle procedure. Si prevedono procedure centralizzate (domanda unica, deposito unico, controllo unico, ecc.) al termine dei quali vengono rilasciati tanti brevetti quanti sono i paesi aderenti alla convenzione istitutiva dell'EPorg, ed ogni brevetto soggiace alla - diversa - legislazione nazionale. Parliamo di circa 150 paesi diversi, con altrettante legislazioni. Un primo importante traguardo sarà raggiunto quando entrerà in vigore il brevetto comunitario contemplato dalla Convenzione del Lussemburgo (unica la procedura, unica la disciplina legislativa in tutti gli stati) ma perché ciò sia possibile bisognerà attendere la ratifica di tutti gli stati membri dell'UE. Può sembrare poco, ma giuridicamente segnerebbe una svolta importantissima.
Insomma attualmente un "brevetto internazionale" non esiste e forse non esisterà per almeno cinquant'anni.
Detto questo, io alcune scelte della società continuo a non spiegarmele e conseguentemente a non condividerle.
Saluti.
The withdrawal of the instance is a very small thing, an inheritance that almost certainly does not find its cause in strategic choices, but I think it derives from purely procedural nature. Consider this, it is a kind of sub-procedure that takes place in an international procedure governed by so extensive norms that I'm afraid even just to consult. Considering the complexity, it goes without saying that the basis for the lack of patent extension to those countries could be any reason. Actually, I think it was not even a choice of the company, but of the law firm. This, however, does not necessarily mean that the society will renounce any protection in those countries, but simply will not rely on the centralized (extending) procedure, yet may require separate national patents from their respective countries. It is almost useless to say that Fidia is free to sell even in countries where it has not received any protection on the invention (including patent rights), but that would not allow it to take remedies to defend industrial privatization (ec action Counterfeiting, seizure, destruction, etc.) to those who exploit the unpatented invention economically (provided that the patented invention does receive a limited protection even in various systems - including ours).
Ultimately, I would rule out that it is the index that reveals a commercial strategy, but allow the benefit of the doubt ...
To answer the user Heynz: we are absolutely far from a uniform European commercial law, more than an international law. As far as the patent is concerned, some steps forward have been made but limited to the procedures. Centralized procedures are envisaged (single application, single deposit, single control, etc.) at the end of which so many patents are issued, as are the countries that accede to the EPorg Convention, and each patent is subject to different national legislation. We are talking about 150 different countries, with as many laws. A first important milestone will be achieved when the Community patent covered by the Luxembourg Convention (the only procedure, the only legislative framework in all countries) will come into force, but because it is possible to wait for the ratification of all EU member states. It may seem small, but legally it would mark a very important turn.
So now an "international patent" does not exist and maybe it will not exist for at least fifty years.
That being said, I some choices of the company continue to not explain and consequently not to share them.
Greetings.
Iam asking for everyone's opinion but
Iam asking especially for their opinion because all those guys who want this to work (including me) are maybe wearing rose-colored glasses.
They have mental issues. They have no self respect. Now it's your turn to show self respect and never mention their useless names on this forum. They are worth sh*t. Absolutely worthless.
I bet that these parasites (that is the perfect expression for them) have pictures of Brotzu over their beds because these mentally unstable individuals will be the first girls who run after this lotion. They have been rejected so many times in their life that they don't understand if almost everybody here tell them to shut up. Telling them to "Shut up" is absolutely normal for them because they hear it everyday, every minute. They got used to it.
Concerning Fidia I can assure you that this lotion is going to work but nobody knows to what extent... At minimum it should be able to replace finasteride which already would be a breakthrough.
Brotzu himself kept saying that you can regrow 5 years of lost hair. Think about the dimension he speaks. That is why I said I can assure you that it is at minimum (worst case in my opinion) a replacement for the dick killing pills.
Good times are coming, I can feel it. 2018 will be our year to end this nightmare.
Last edited:
- Reaction score
- 223
Boy, this post is so well-put, so articulate it smells kinda fishy.
Btw, google translate still sucks considerably!
hahahah dgla theory is silly is his argument?
Hope this was a lesson for all of you who want to ask for the opinion of parasites.
This guy is full of sh*t. His explanation is: "Dgla theory is silly, search it"......
Bitchkas I knew that you are retarded as fkck but you bring yourself to another level of stupidity.