Italian Hair Loss Lotion To Hit The Market In 2016

[ElTioLaBota]

Thanks for sharing Switzer.

Information of value can be found on the Text Intended For Grant Links. Page 19 reveals results of trials of 5 groups, featuring men and women.

> In groups 1 and 2 hair loss has stopped after 7 days. By day 20 these groups report 'fuzz'.

> Day 45. Group 1 report this 'fuzz has grown markedly stronger and takes the colour and consistency of natural hair.'

> Day 90. Group 1 'disappearance of hair reduction areas have been replaced by thick shiny hair'. Group 2 report 'thick fuzz'.

I don't know if this information has been published before (apologies if it has) but this sounds encouraging.

The only drawback is the sample size of these groups. Group 1 featured 6 males and 4 females.

That document was published december last year bro...

 

[Tazzo82]

tik tok tik tok.....

cant wait to tell a couple of you guys "I TOLD YOU SO".... ahahah...

 

[d3nt3dsh0v3l]

Someone want to try to breakdown #2 in the 'Communication about intention to grant a European patent' document?

What the f*** did you just f*****g say about me, you little b**ch? I’ll have you know I graduated top of my class in patent law, and I’ve been involved in numerous patent offices, and I have over 300 granted patents. I am trained in international patent law and I’m the top patent attorney in the entire European Patent Office. You are nothing to me but just another client. I will examine you the f*** out with attention to detail the likes of which has never been seen before on this Earth, mark my f*****g words. You think you can get away with not verifying the bibliographic data? Think again, f****r. As we speak I am contacting my highly trained network of aides across my office and your Communication about intention to grant a European patent is being sent right now so you better prepare for the review of the bibliographic data, maggot. The review of the bibliographic data that finalizes the pathetic little thing you call your patent. You’re f*****g granted, patent. I can be helpful, anytime, and I can edit your bibliographic data in over seven hundred ways, and that’s just with a ballpoint pen. Not only am I extensively trained in bibliography, but I have access to the entire arsenal of the European Patent Office and I will use it to its full extent to revise your miserable patent off the face of the continent, you little sh*t. If only you could have known what unholy retribution Rule 71 EPC was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have EITHER verified the bibliographic data (by filing the claims in the two official languages of the EPO and paying fees) or if you disapproved, requested reasoned amendments. But you couldn’t, you didn’t, and now you’re given an Invitation, you goddamn client. I will invite you, within a non-extendable period of four months, to pay the fees, and you will withdraw the European patent application if neither of the two possible actions above is performed in due time. You’re f*****g granted, patent.

 

[Royaume]

tik tok tik tok.....

cant wait to tell a couple of you guys "I TOLD YOU SO".... ahahah...

I knew that you are not a troll. Only idiots cannot see the difference between a troll and someone who is telling the truth.

Of course you can have doubts but insulting without knowing it for sure is just stupid.

 

[ElTioLaBota]

What the f*** did you just f*****g say about me, you little b**ch? I’ll have you know I graduated top of my class in patent law, and I’ve been involved in numerous patent offices, and I have over 300 granted patents. I am trained in international patent law and I’m the top patent attorney in the entire European Patent Office. You are nothing to me but just another client. I will examine you the f*** out with attention to detail the likes of which has never been seen before on this Earth, mark my f*****g words. You think you can get away with not verifying the bibliographic data? Think again, f****r. As we speak I am contacting my highly trained network of aides across my office and your Communication about intention to grant a European patent is being sent right now so you better prepare for the review of the bibliographic data, maggot. The review of the bibliographic data that finalizes the pathetic little thing you call your patent. You’re f*****g granted, patent. I can be helpful, anytime, and I can edit your bibliographic data in over seven hundred ways, and that’s just with a ballpoint pen. Not only am I extensively trained in bibliography, but I have access to the entire arsenal of the European Patent Office and I will use it to its full extent to revise your miserable patent off the face of the continent, you little sh*t. If only you could have known what unholy retribution Rule 71 EPC was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have EITHER verified the bibliographic data (by filing the claims in the two official languages of the EPO and paying fees) or if you disapproved, requested reasoned amendments. But you couldn’t, you didn’t, and now you’re given an Invitation, you goddamn client. I will invite you, within a non-extendable period of four months, to pay the fees, and you will withdraw the European patent application if neither of the two possible actions above is performed in due time. You’re f*****g granted, patent.

What the actual f***?

 

[17AndBalding]

What the actual f***?

http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/navy-seal-copypasta

It is a nice spin on this old copy pasta

 

[kawnshawn]

The header of the pages: "Description (12.11.15)"

So, this is definitely old. Also, none of the five groups state what ailment is being treated.

Although, sample size aside, reading this sort of thing really makes one wonder exactly what Fidia is doing with this stuff.

EDIT: On page 21-22 they do make it sound like results extend to various forms of alopecia, without being explicit.

It's the trial Brotzu did then. His was a small sample, had men and women, and treated different forms of alopecia.

 

[ZenHead]

What the f*** did you just f*****g say about me, you little b**ch? I’ll have you know I graduated top of my class in patent law, and I’ve been involved in numerous patent offices, and I have over 300 granted patents. I am trained in international patent law and I’m the top patent attorney in the entire European Patent Office. You are nothing to me but just another client. I will examine you the f*** out with attention to detail the likes of which has never been seen before on this Earth, mark my f*****g words. You think you can get away with not verifying the bibliographic data? Think again, f****r. As we speak I am contacting my highly trained network of aides across my office and your Communication about intention to grant a European patent is being sent right now so you better prepare for the review of the bibliographic data, maggot. The review of the bibliographic data that finalizes the pathetic little thing you call your patent. You’re f*****g granted, patent. I can be helpful, anytime, and I can edit your bibliographic data in over seven hundred ways, and that’s just with a ballpoint pen. Not only am I extensively trained in bibliography, but I have access to the entire arsenal of the European Patent Office and I will use it to its full extent to revise your miserable patent off the face of the continent, you little sh*t. If only you could have known what unholy retribution Rule 71 EPC was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have EITHER verified the bibliographic data (by filing the claims in the two official languages of the EPO and paying fees) or if you disapproved, requested reasoned amendments. But you couldn’t, you didn’t, and now you’re given an Invitation, you goddamn client. I will invite you, within a non-extendable period of four months, to pay the fees, and you will withdraw the European patent application if neither of the two possible actions above is performed in due time. You’re f*****g granted, patent.

Lol this dude is just trolling, its a revised version of some other famous comment that people post all over the internet. Well done, sir

 

[ElTioLaBota]

It's the trial Brotzu did then. His was a small sample, had men and women, and treated different forms of alopecia.

Imo it is a scam, the study us super shitty, no pictures, no numbers, no nothing, just words, and btw it is literally impossible to stop hairloss in just 7 days cause the hair that fails was meant to fall 3 months ago...

 

[Royaume]

Imo it is a scam, the study us super shitty, no pictures, no numbers, no nothing, just words, and btw it is literally impossible to stop hairloss in just 7 days cause the hair that fails was meant to fall 3 months ago...

imo you are an idiot

 

[ZenHead]

The science behind this is really solid. Hair isn't necessarily "programmed" to fall out months ago. Yeah, maybe if you aren't on any treatments, but this lotion is designed to reduce inflammation and probably induce angiogenesis (formation of new blood vessels) in the scalp. Brotzu is a vascular surgeon and discovered the science behind this treatment by accident something like 10 years ago. Prostaglandin manipulation is going to be huge. This is speculation but this should work, especially on those that recently started to lose hair. Not even trying to be optimistic, just being real. Whether or not this will be released soon (if ever?) is a different story. My bet is it will be released somewhere in the next 1-2 years, but in the meantime lets not get our hopes up

 

[Dat5Years]

Still people who think its a scam, still posting, reading this thread. Weird stuff

 

[SamFT]

Still people who think its a scam, still posting, reading this thread. Weird stuff

Saying it's a scam but secretly hoping it isn't

 

[ZenHead]

This thread has almost 1,800,000 views... holy hell, I hope Fidia is taking pre-orders!

 

[PuffyPink]

At least 200000 views from me.

We already found out a few months ago, that the patent update means nothing, not even that they still trust the product. Just sayin

 

[nWo Wolfpac]

At least 200000 views from me.

We already found out a few months ago, that the patent update means nothing, not even that they still trust the product. Just sayin

Why doesn't this mean that they still trust the product?

 

[ElTioLaBota]

Saying it's a scam but secretly hoping it isn't

Ofc i do this, but like everyone, expect nothing and you qill never be disappointed.

 

[tjnpdx]

What the f*** did you just f*****g say about me, you little b**ch? I’ll have you know I graduated top of my class in patent law, and I’ve been involved in numerous patent offices, and I have over 300 granted patents. I am trained in international patent law and I’m the top patent attorney in the entire European Patent Office. You are nothing to me but just another client. I will examine you the f*** out with attention to detail the likes of which has never been seen before on this Earth, mark my f*****g words. You think you can get away with not verifying the bibliographic data? Think again, f****r. As we speak I am contacting my highly trained network of aides across my office and your Communication about intention to grant a European patent is being sent right now so you better prepare for the review of the bibliographic data, maggot. The review of the bibliographic data that finalizes the pathetic little thing you call your patent. You’re f*****g granted, patent. I can be helpful, anytime, and I can edit your bibliographic data in over seven hundred ways, and that’s just with a ballpoint pen. Not only am I extensively trained in bibliography, but I have access to the entire arsenal of the European Patent Office and I will use it to its full extent to revise your miserable patent off the face of the continent, you little sh*t. If only you could have known what unholy retribution Rule 71 EPC was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have EITHER verified the bibliographic data (by filing the claims in the two official languages of the EPO and paying fees) or if you disapproved, requested reasoned amendments. But you couldn’t, you didn’t, and now you’re given an Invitation, you goddamn client. I will invite you, within a non-extendable period of four months, to pay the fees, and you will withdraw the European patent application if neither of the two possible actions above is performed in due time. You’re f*****g granted, patent.

Thanks for the breakdown, man. I have to ask, though, that if you insist on giving full play to your psychosis on the forum that you shorten the posts a little bit so I can read all of what you say; I only made it a few lines in. At least add a TL : DR

 

[tjnpdx]

What the actual f***?

It’s what he does.

 

[d3nt3dsh0v3l]

Thanks for the breakdown, man. I have to ask, though, that if you insist on giving full play to your psychosis on the forum that you shorten the posts a little bit so I can read all of what you say; I only made it a few lines in. At least add a TL : DR

Wow get a load of this guy.

Bruh, I lovingly italicized and bolded and underlined all the best parts.