It's time to acknowledge that RU is DANGEROUS

[pegasus2]

Huichem. I've held off RU until now, other aa's (duta, daro, apa, enza, bica, abi) hit me, so i think i might do a n=1...
what's your vehicle? do you know if it's heat stable? (interesting what disolves in butlyene glycol at 60c on mag stir)

I'm not currently using anything. I use different vehicles for topicals, buy usually will use a little dmso, ethanol, and something like pg, peg or transcutol. It's stable up to 50c, I don't know about 60. RU is highly soluble though without heat in ethanol

 

[pegasus2]

thanks. so no sides with a touch of dmso and ru? dmso is ultimate test for me, can taste within 5 min if i spill on hand

Nope. 5% RU

 

[BigBadBaldie]

He never showed any proof, but he had no reason to make it up. Combine that with the fact that the company was telling investors that they were shopping the drug around, and it seems reasonable to assume it's true. The SEC would have a problem with Prostraken telling investors they have a drug that could bring them money when they know they can't sell it due to safety results. This would actually be illegal. I don't think the company would break the law for the minor benefit of making investors think they could sell RU(a small part of their portfolio) to another company.

The companies that sell this stuff to us are on the forums though so there is an incentive to lie about results or other information to fool the rest of us into buying it. It very well could be true but I definitely wouldn’t claim it as a fact. Either way as someone who spent 2 years using RU I wouldn’t recommend it to anyone under any circumstances.

 

[pegasus2]

The companies that sell this stuff to us are on the forums though so there is an incentive to lie about results or other information to fool the rest of us into buying it. It very well could be true but I definitely wouldn’t claim it as a fact. Either way as someone who spent 2 years using RU I wouldn’t recommend it to anyone under any circumstances.

You're forgetting the other piece of my comment, the two points go together. The forum member's claim isn't the sole piece of evidence, even though he wasn't a new member. The fact is Prostraken claimed in an investor presentation that the drug had value, and that they would try to sell it. This was after phase 2 trials. If they knew the drug had safety issues they could not have said that. Therefore we know that phase 2 did not show a problem with safety. Everyone who is against RU is ignoring this point while focusing on the one where they can create doubt. Why would you stay on RU for 2 years if it was so bad?

 

[NW9000]

I as well as a few close friends/fam have been using it with zero side effects for over 10yrs, with me only using it on aas cycles. I've deduced most of these posts about having to go to ER etc are either from trolls lacking real life attention, those with agendas, and those who are getting impure or fake sh*t

10 years wtf

Was there even public knowledge about it in 2011

Tbh I first heard about it in 2014

 

[Einstein]

10 years wtf

Was there even public knowledge about it in 2011

Tbh I first heard about it in 2

10+ yrs. If I recall correctly I think it was El dutasteride amongst a few others on HLH that brought it to the attention of the masses around 2008. I personally ordered my first batch in 2009

 

[NamelessGhoul]

nevermind its safety. its efficacy is just sh*t. I personally think the only people RU is useful for is people who are on roids. Natty's who are losing their hair should look elsewhere. I could be wrong but honestly, it just seems sh*t and did nothing for me.

 

[NW9000]

10+ yrs. If I recall correctly I think it was El dutasteride amongst a few others on HLH that brought it to the attention of the masses around 2008. I personally ordered my first batch in 2009

damn, OG

 

[Pixie]

nevermind its safety. its efficacy is just sh*t. I personally think the only people RU is useful for is people who are on roids. Natty's who are losing their hair should look elsewhere. I could be wrong but honestly, it just seems sh*t and did nothing for me.

LOL the "lack of efficacy" argument will probably dissuade people more than any warning about life threatening sides. Personally, I was seeing some results, but it's hard to say how much I would have gotten back if I could have continued treatment.