Just Donated $200 To Send Hellouser To Japan.

[nameless]

Correct
he is Not shamed.
You attempted to do so because of your warped perspective BUT for the rest of us it is a warped perspective.




equating a man not putting money towards something he does not feel is necessary
and
him beating a woman.

you really need mental help.

You, hanginginthere, that_guy and his supporters does not = "the rest of us". There are thousands of us here. I think that many posters here would not approve of some guy excessively mooching off a woman.

And I did not say anything about "a man not putting money towards something he does not feel is "necessary". That_Guy's stated reason for not contributing is that he shouldn't have to contribute because he has already helped you (and everyone else here) enough by coming here and posting to us. He said that since he's posted to us that should entitle him to the HLC information at the rest of our expense. You're lying about his justification for not contributing. You're intentionally trying to make his justification for not contributing sound less wicked and self-serving than it truly is.

Also, I take the position that what I did was compare situations where I think it's appropriate to apply some chivalry. Yes one of the situations involved a man hitting a woman while the other situation did NOT. But IMO chivalry shouldn't only apply when a man is beating a woman up. I think it should also apply in other situations and I think this is one of those situations.

 

[That Guy]

Lmao this dude is so unhinged; someone send the cops to check his basement and shed.

Anyway, you can't "shame" me because I don't care lol

If Hellouser manages to get some exclusive inside info, that's cool; if not, I'm going to be reading about the conference from all the other media anyway and whatever is going to happen with the tech is going to happen whether he goes to Japan or not.

What this actually is, and always has been, is Nameless trying to virtue signal about how great and generous he is for donating $200.

You should have spent that $200 on a hooker, instead — it would do you a lot of good, dude.

 

[nameless]

As I've proved numerous times, the reason that "that_guy doesn't contribute is because he feels everyone else here owes it to him to pay his way for the Hair Loss Congress expenses. Here in italics and bolded in quotes is that_guy saying exactly that.


"I didn't want to admit this in this madman's thread, but f*** it, I'll give you the reason I'm not donating:

I contribute as it is. I've already got published articles on new hairloss research and tech, with lots more on the way and I will also pen an article covering every nitty-gritty detail I can dig up about what goes down at the conference as it happens; covering anything Hellouser can't or did not get and it will be here for you to read, free of charge unless someone higher up tells me otherwise. There's lots more info headed your way about stem cells, health factors that play into hairloss, new technologies and regenerative therapies and I'm also going to try setting up an interview or two, when Tsuji's trials begin, I'll be watching like a hawk and relaying every bit of info on the as soon as it happens. All of this info written in association with the best hairloss treasure hunters and scientifically literate members of the community.

I think what Hellouser is trying to do is great and with the best of intentions, I personally will not be donating, though I wish him the best of luck."

That_guy did not say that he thinks the Hair Loss Congress information is unnecessary or needless. Indeed, he knows that the information might be important and he wished Hellouser luck. Plain and simply put the reason why that_guy thinks the rest of us should pay his way is stated by him when he states, "I contribute as it is".

Any poster who says that_guy isn't contributing because he thinks the Hair Loss Congress information is "unnecessary" or "needless" is lying. That_guy simply thinks that the other posters here owe it to him to pay his way because he does so much for the rest of us. And anyone who donates from this point forward is basically telling him that he's right, and he will interpret your donation as your acknowledgment that you owe him, and you donated in part to pay him back for all that he has done for you. And that's how I'll interpret it too because everyone understands that is what that_guy told us all.

We can make up sweet innocent stories about how that_guy just thinks the information is needless but that's a fairy-tale and he himself told everyone so. He expects others to pay his way because of all he has done for everyone else.

 

[nameless]

Lmao this dude is so unhinged; someone send the cops to check his basement and shed.

Anyway, you can't "shame" me because I don't care lol

If Hellouser manages to get some exclusive inside info, that's cool; if not, I'm going to be reading about the conference from all the other media anyway and whatever is going to happen with the tech is going to happen whether he goes to Japan or not.

What this actually is, and always has been, is Nameless trying to virtue signal about how great and generous he is for donating $200.

You should have spent that $200 on a hooker, instead — it would do you a lot of good, dude.

Why don't you call the cops on me yourself punk?

 

[That Guy]

So what have you ever done for the community aside from be a pain in everyone's ***, cry about how women half your age don't love you, and grandstand about how you threw money at a kickstarter?

lol

 

[nameless]

So what have you ever done for the community aside from be a pain in everyone's ***, cry about how women half your age don't love you, and grandstand about how you threw money at a kickstarter?

lol

Weren't you going to send the cops punk? Do you have to ask your mommy for the coin to make the call?

And about that money I donated, there's a postscript but I'm not going to talk about it because I don't want to jinx it. LOL!

 

[That Guy]

Weren't you going to send the cops punk? Do you have to ask your mommy for the coin to make the call?

You're answering my question with another question.

Nice ninja edit by the way.

You say you want to meet up "man-o-man" but then back down and edit it out.

 

[nameless]

You're answering my question with another question.

Nice ninja edit by the way.

You say you want to meet up "man-o-man" but then back down and edit it out.

I edited it because I didn't want to risk being accused by you of making a threat. Since you decided to raise the issue, I would love to meet up with you once this hair crap is behind us.

 

[That Guy]

I edited it out because I didn't want to risk being accused of threatening you punk. I would love to meet up with you once this hair crap is behind us.

Everytime Nameless says "punk", drink.

and why not before?

 

[hellouser]

If Hellouser manages to get some exclusive inside info, that's cool; if not, I'm going to be reading about the conference from all the other media anyway

No you won't, LOL! I can't recall any media reporting on ANYTHING from the Abilene congress. Plus, nobody provided a single recorded presentation. Pretty sure this was the case when we sent Desmond years back as well.

If media does report, you certainly won't hear about it for a LONG time.

 

[nameless]

Everytime Nameless says "punk", drink.

and why not before?

I don't want to risk pics of me getting out in public. If you and I got together for some wrestling you could possibly snap pics of me.

Besides, I'm like Samson, I get my strength from my hair.

Just give me my hair back and let me get a couple beers in me.

 

[nameless]

No you won't, LOL! I can't recall any media reporting on ANYTHING from the Abilene congress. Plus, nobody provided a single recorded presentation. Pretty sure this was the case when we sent Desmond years back as well.

If media does report, you certainly won't hear about it for a LONG time.

You are absolutely, totally, 100% right Hellouser and he knows it. Much as I despise him I know he's not stupid and I know he remembers that there was no information in the media last time.

He just doesn't want to contribute because he believes the rest of us owe him a free ride because of all that he's done for us. LOL. He has not grown one hair on my head.

 

[That Guy]

No you won't, LOL! I can't recall any media reporting on ANYTHING from the Abilene congress. Plus, nobody provided a single recorded presentation. Pretty sure this was the case when we sent Desmond years back as well.

If media does report, you certainly won't hear about it for a LONG time.

You're delusional if you think that any pertinent info from the conference isn't going to make it's way into other sources. Like actual scientific journals which if you haven't noticed, this community is very good at following.

Secondly, nobody actually cares if they hear about the day it happens or months later; again, if there is anything truly ground-breaking and worthwhile that will come of whatever research the presenters have, we will hear about it and if it actually goes anywhere, we will know about it.

You do also realize that literally all of the most significant news regarding hairloss research to date, has not be unveiled at some conference? It's been published through journals and scientific media.

Do you honestly believe that if Tsuji's team cracks the culturing problem that they're not going to publish it and it won't get media attention when that same team is willing to do in-depth interviews with a random hairloss site?

I wish you luck with your kickstarter, but I think you and others have unrealistic expectations about it.

 

[nameless]

You're delusional if you think that any pertinent info from the conference isn't going to make it's way into other sources. Like actual scientific journals which if you haven't noticed, this community is very good at following.

Secondly, nobody actually cares if they hear about the day it happens or months later; again, if there is anything truly ground-breaking and worthwhile that will come of whatever research the presenters have, we will hear about it and if it actually goes anywhere, we will know about it.

You do also realize that literally all of the most significant news regarding hairloss research to date, has not be unveiled at some conference? It's been published through journals and scientific media.

Do you honestly believe that if Tsuji's team cracks the culturing problem that they're not going to publish it and it won't get media attention when that same team is willing to do in-depth interviews with a random hairloss site?

I wish you luck with your kickstarter, but I think you and others have unrealistic expectations about it.

And of course this is more bs by you. You know that the journal articles won't come out for a year or longer after the Congress. After submission of an article it can take as long as a year to get published. You already stated why you don't contribute. Here is your stated reason:

"I contribute as it is."

Your point is that you already do so much for the rest of us that the rest of us owe it to you to pay your way.

 

[That Guy]

And of course this is more bs by you. You know that the journal articles won't come out for a year or longer after the Congress. After submission of an article it can take as long as a year to get published.

Here's a quick rundown for your tiny f*****g mind:

• RepliCel's data: Details about it were announced months in advance to be released in their own press release...and they were.

• The Riken/Kyocera deal was announced to be in the works ahead of time and then formally announced with a description of the process in a detailed press release.

• Sanford-Burnham's finding's were published in Nature and unveiled in...wait for it...a f*****g press release.

• Follica plans to publish their data from their trials in the near future, though an exact date hasn't been given. You know how they'll do this? Probably in a god damn press release, a letter to puretech investors and they have also held events open to dermatologists.

• PolarityTE has unveiled all of the pictures and most of the details about their skin regeneration therapy, which they're hoping to seek FDA approval for next year in...wait for it again...a f*****g press release and is thoroughly detailed on their website which is up and running 24/7, 365.

To date, there has not been one significant discovery or piece of info regarding hairloss research that has not been published in a press release, science media and literature..

Thus, if we don't here about anything that was presented at the conference, it probably isn't that significant.

 

[nameless]

Here's a quick rundown for your tiny f*****g mind:

• RepliCel's data: Details about it were announced months in advance to be released in their own press release...and they were.

• The Riken/Kyocera deal was announced to be in the works ahead of time and then formally announced with a description of the process in a detailed press release.

• Sanford-Burnham's finding's were published in Nature and unveiled in...wait for it...a f*****g press release.

• Follica plans to publish their data from their trials in the near future, though an exact date hasn't been given. You know how they'll do this? Probably in a god damn press release, a letter to puretech investors and they have also held events open to dermatologists.

• PolarityTE has unveiled all of the pictures and most of the details about their skin regeneration therapy, which they're hoping to seek FDA approval for next year in...wait for it again...a f*****g press release and is thoroughly detailed on their website which is up and running 24/7, 365.

To date, there has not been one significant discovery or piece of info regarding hairloss research that has not been published in a press release, science media and literature..

Thus, if we don't here about anything that was presented at the conference, it probably isn't that significant.

Shut up you self-serving punk.

Here is that_guy telling everyone here why he doesn't donate:

"I contribute as it is."

 

[nameless]

Hey Hellouser, this POS that_guy is informing us that the only reliable way to get information is via press-releases so let's just cancel the entire Hair Loss Congress trip and wait until mid-to-late 2018 for the press-releases about these treatments. Shiseido will release information about their study as soon as the study is completed in mid-to-late 2018. So forget the fact that in November 2017 we could get a preview of that information at the Congress. Let's just wait the extra 9 months to a year for the information. That's what that_guy really wants to do. Of course, that_guy won't read the Hair Loss Congress information if you get it this November, right? Of course, he will wait until mid-to-late 2018 to get that same information from Shiseido in a press-release after the study is completed rather than reading the same info earlier if you bring it back from the Congress, right?

 

[That Guy]

So you still haven't answered my question, sh*t heel:

What have you done for anybody here aside from be a pain in the ***?

 

[nameless]

Here's a quick rundown for your tiny f*****g mind:

• RepliCel's data: Details about it were announced months in advance to be released in their own press release...and they were.

• The Riken/Kyocera deal was announced to be in the works ahead of time and then formally announced with a description of the process in a detailed press release.

• Sanford-Burnham's finding's were published in Nature and unveiled in...wait for it...a f*****g press release.

• Follica plans to publish their data from their trials in the near future, though an exact date hasn't been given. You know how they'll do this? Probably in a god damn press release, a letter to puretech investors and they have also held events open to dermatologists.

• PolarityTE has unveiled all of the pictures and most of the details about their skin regeneration therapy, which they're hoping to seek FDA approval for next year in...wait for it again...a f*****g press release and is thoroughly detailed on their website which is up and running 24/7, 365.

To date, there has not been one significant discovery or piece of info regarding hairloss research that has not been published in a press release, science media and literature..

Thus, if we don't here about anything that was presented at the conference, it probably isn't that significant.

All of these research groups you mentioned either gave information that said nothing about hair growth (i.e. the Riken/Kyocera deal) or they gave information at the end of a study (i.e Replicel). The most important studies that are coming to fruition won't do so until mid-to-late 2018 (Shiseido) or even 2019 (Tsuji) you f'n excuse-making mooch.

What is sooner - November 2017 or mid-to-late 2018 or 2019? Are you really trying to convince the rest of us that you're OK with waiting to mid-to-late 2018 or even 2019 to get information that you could get in November 2017? What a laugh! If Hellouser goes to the Congress in November you are definitely going to read the information rather than waiting until mid-to-late 2018 or even 2019. You definitely care if you get the information in November 2017 rather than having to wait until mid-to-late 2018 or even 2019. You're just pretending that you don't care because you want other posters to feel like they better donate (and pay your way) because you're not going to. You're just asserting a phony negotiating position. And it might work too. Weak posters might get scared and pay your way because of fear that you won't pay. But if they hold out then you will pay. If you end up not contributing it will only be because some people lacked the courage and willpower to wait you out.

 

[nameless]

So you still haven't answered my question, sh*t heel:

What have you done for anybody here aside from be a pain in the ***?

I've warned them about mooches and sponges, such as yourself.

And if people listen to me I will save them some money because sooner or later you will contribute if people stop donating. And if you contribute then they won't have to pay as much. Plus if they listen to me then you will contribute and they will get the satisfaction of defeating your attempt to mooch off them.

How many hairs have you grown on anyone else's head? Answer - ZERO.
All you've done with people is try to separate them from their money...try to get them to pay your way.