Just Donated $200 To Send Hellouser To Japan.
- Thread starter nameless
- Start date
Sure lol. You have no argument because the information, to my knowledge, is intended to be posted on the site for all to read anyway. There isn't any plan I'm aware of to limit access to whomever doesn't contribute. You're just demanding special treatment for donating a large amount of money.
Again, all pertinent info regarding hairloss treatments is generally published for the public to read by researchers and companies themselves in a timely manner, regardless.
Hahaha.
Washington State is literally right across the border from me. What the hell? I thought you wanted to meet up.
Oh well,
Call (205) 658-5624 if you're in the greater Seattle area; they can help you with your woman problem.
Then, If you go to 9601 Steilacoom Blvd SW, Lakewood, WA 98498, USA (shouldn't be too much of a drive) they will be able to help you with your obvious mental problems.
Again, all pertinent info regarding hairloss treatments is generally published for the public to read by researchers and companies themselves in a timely manner, regardless.
Hahaha.
Washington State is literally right across the border from me. What the hell? I thought you wanted to meet up.
Oh well,
Call (205) 658-5624 if you're in the greater Seattle area; they can help you with your woman problem.
Then, If you go to 9601 Steilacoom Blvd SW, Lakewood, WA 98498, USA (shouldn't be too much of a drive) they will be able to help you with your obvious mental problems.
Figures you would know where the prostitutes and psychiatrists are.
The more people see your self-righteous attitude the more people could get annoyed with you. If they get annoyed enough with people like you they might decide to make the Congress information exclusive to contributors. The information isn't published for everyone to see yet. Until that happens anything can change. Please keep talking about how people owe you.
I never said anyone "owed" me lol
Rather, I'm saying I don't owe anyone else anything.
Any reasonable person with a 3-digit IQ would interpret the stuff you've said to mean that you believe people owe you for all you have done for us.
Given that Hellouser has truly done a lot for everyone and he still contributes, Hellouser might take exception to your attitude that everyone owes you because you've done so much for us all. And Hellouser is one of the people who will decide if the info is exclusive to contributors.
And regarding my donation there is a postscript that I'm not willing to share at this time.
This isn't like the Wallstreet Journal, where I know full well that if I want the content they specifically produce, I will have to pay for it.
I don't owe news reporters gas money for driving to the locations of their broadcast.
I don't owe the author of an article on Yahoo! News a cent for reading his article
gourmetstylewellness.com readers and subscribers don't owe me anything for reading my article
gourmetstylewellness.com forum members don't owe me anything for any piece of information I've brought them.
The most I ask for is "don't be a c***" and you can't even do that.
If Hellouser and the Admin decided to make the information he gets from the conference exclusive to backers, that is up to them. So until such time as they do — which I've suggest perhaps offering incentives like maybe Hellouser could do a private periscope session or something live from the floor with you guys — your complaint is just entitled bitching.
It's the free market at work. If people are able to both read and bring you ground-breaking hairloss news for free, paying for a trip that is unlikely to bring back such information is seen as a poor investment.
Last edited:
Now you're trying to change your reason for not contributing. You originally said you're entitled to have others pay your way because of everything you've done for us. But now you're trying to change that to nobody owes a contribution, which is infinitely more reasonable. If you had said this to begin with I wouldn't be all over your moochy ***. But it's too late now.
The only reason you're trying to change your reason to something more reasonable is because you've finally figured out that your true reason (you're entitled to have others pay your way because of everything you've done for us) is offensive and insulting to those of us with some sense. But you repeatedly (4 or 5 times) went on record and said that you're entitled to have others pay your way because of everything you've done for us and now you're stuck with that explanation. And your attempts to change your story is insulting and manipulative.
Now shut up and go away until you learn to blow bubbles through a straw in your anus.
Last edited:
hanginginthewire
Senior Member
- Reaction score
- 1,430
Where is the article that you wrote, ThatGuy?
H
Senior Member
- Reaction score
- 775
What if we send Nameless and That Guy to the Congress? That Guy is pretty good with posting info and sounds pretty sociable in his posts so he can do the interviews but Nameless is our knight in shining armor. I'm not even joking if there is anyone that can show these researchers how big of an impact hair loss can be on the wellbeing and mental state of its victims its him.
This is gold right here. Even though it's sounds like he has a mate interested already knowing he doesnt have hair and accepting him as is, he will not move forward with his life until he has it back. I'm not even making fun of Nameless I really think they'd hear him say what's in that post and go what in the hairless f*** are we doing wasting time on this Congress we have to help these people.
What if the woman who is interested in me while I'm missing hair is kind of unattractive? Or what if she's kind of attractive and I figure I can't protect the relationship because women who are kind of attractive cheat on bald men? Do you really think someone would find those 2 possible reasons (for why I won't settle down with her) hard to understand?
Last edited:
H
Senior Member
- Reaction score
- 775
I can understand these 2 reasons although it is shallow to call her unattractive if all that gives you looks is hair. I'm not quite sure I only have myself to go off of but I've actually been cheated on before I started losing hair and from this I believe guys with hair are also being cheated on maybe even involving a bald man. Seriously though you stressing how much hair means to you in that post is a great asset.
I haven't "changed" any reasoning.
It's just taken pages and pages of me explaining, in several different ways, that if a guy like me is capable of finding and contributing and compiling information regarding these developing technologies as it happens and sharing it with everyone at no cost to you, then it's extremely hard to justify pitching in money to send a guy to a conference there is no reason to believe any top-secret, absolutely-must-know details will be divulged to.
How can I justify that Nameless? How can others? Again, I'm not saying it's a bad thing for him to go, but it's very difficult to justify donating when anybody is capable of getting pertinent info at no cost.
You know I'm right; that's why you had doubled back and made that other thread saying it was a mistake.
What all of this madness is about, is that you are afraid that your generous donation will go to waste and you'll be disappointed with whatever Hellouser finds. As such, you want everyone else who didn't pitch in to be "punished" so that you'll feel better regardless of the outcome.
If this site (understandably) doesn't have the funds to send him and the community isn't jumping up and down about sending him (when completely retarded kickstarters can meet their goals in just a day) then...maybe it's not worth it?
Right on the homepage of gourmetstylewellness.com and you should have all received notifications about it a while ago. It's about RepliCel's technologies. One of my pictures was omitted by mistake I think, but I'm pretty happy because it's the only article I've seen that covers ALL of the uses for their hair-follicle-derived cell therapies in one text and actually talks exclusively about the technology and its applications rather than being all about stock like most RepliCel articles on the internet are.
In fact, you are trying to change your story. You are trying to mesh your new story into your old story to make it seem like they are the same. If you tried this stunt in a court of law you would be hit with a perjury charge, the judge/jurors would roll their eyes, and the lawyer against you would take you apart on the witness stand while you sat there and squirmed. You are a liar and you are trying to change your story.
You have provided nothing of real significance here other than that you are sometimes a good sounding board for testing some of my ideas on. But that doesn't make you special here. It doesn't make you more valuable here than anyone else. You're just another guy posting here. You have not grown one hair on my head. The only people here who have gone above and beyond for us all is Hellouser and Admin. Everyone else, including you, is just posting.
Last edited:
I don't care if it's shallow to judge women by their looks based on their hair. Women judge us by our looks based on our hair. That's why we want our hair back.
And even though guys get cheated on when they have full heads of hair a lot of us believe that losing our hair increases our chances of being cheated on. You can reject that belief if you chose to but there have been a lot of posts by a lot of guys at this site talking about how women are more likely to cheat on bald guys, so there is a lot of support for my position that being bald can increase a guy's chances of being cheated on, whether you agree or not.
Last edited:
H
Senior Member
- Reaction score
- 775
Oh but I totally agree my good man not once in my post did I say that bald men could not get cheated on. Purple men could get cheated on men with squirrel tails could get cheated on. I'm just saying being with a bald man doesn't automatically mean their eyes are going to light red and affair mode is activated, there are many reasons why humans in general might cheat but novelty would seem to be the core.
This female friend of yours has bad hair? Thats why you won't romanticize with her?
You're high man.
Please post the quote where I said you said that bald men can't get cheated on.
I never said that you said bald men can't get cheated on. I said you seem to think that being bald won't increase a man's chances of getting cheated on. I disagree with that posit. A lot of us here think that being bald does increase a man's chances of being cheated on. You blame most cheating on novelty. I think most people cheat because they get attracted to other people AND they figure they won't be punished much if they cheat.
I did not specifically state that the woman I'm referring to has bad hair. I said that perhaps she is unattractive (in part due to her hair) so I'm not attracted to her, or perhaps she is attractive and that could increase the chances of her cheating on me.
Last edited:
No, his mistake is that he's misquoting me and your whole agenda is to rag on me wherever you see the opportunity because you're angry with me. LOL!
Or perhaps you would care to show me my quote where I said "H" said bald men can't get cheated on. And don't bother looking for that quote by me because there is no such quote by me jackass.
Last edited: