male pattern baldness on 2 sides of the family=more agressive baldness?

INT

Senior Member
Reaction score
2,838
Hi all,

Yesterday I was watching a Dutch television programme were a man was interviewed who had written a book about baldness.

He started to talk about the Dutch soccer player Wesley Sneijder who had started balding at a very young age and recently had undergone an hair transplant.

He mentioned that Wesley had very agressive hairloss and that was probably due to the fact that he might have baldness running trough both sides of his families.

That sounded a little weird in my mind. I thought it is only a matter of from who you will get your genes from... I mean it can't be possible that male pattern baldness on two sides of your fam makes you bald earlier and faster right?
Of course you will have a much bigger chance of getting male pattern baldness but am I right that it has no effect on the tempo of the hairloss?

For an example:

One of my best friends is 22 and went from a Norwood 1 to a Norwood 3 in about 3 years. On both sides of his family I can only detect ONE person with male pattern baldness and that is his dad.

For myself I'm 21 years and I am having no signs (yet) of male pattern baldness till this day but male pattern baldness runs on both sides of my fam. My dad started at 21, his brother 27 en my mum's dad at 30. The only non-bald guy you can say is my dad's dad.

Anyone?
 

G35guy

Member
Reaction score
0
All I can say is "keep a very close eye on our hair" It may never happen,then again,good luck reguardless.:)
 

1750

Established Member
Reaction score
1
baldness on both sides of the family means you are genetically more likely to go bald yourself.
It does not IMO mean that your hairloss will be more aggressive.
Whilst both parents contribute to your gene pool.. each parent has dominant and recessive gene traits that their child will take on.

My uncles and grandfather from my mothers side...all slick bald by 30.
My father... red head.. lasted a little longer and made it through to mid 40's before looking like Jack Nicholson with a few strands slicked back.

funnily enough general consensus is that you will take after your mothers side of the family...i.e. her father.

For me personally my hairloss pattern seems to be more replicating my fathers (despite the rest of my own characteristics such as complexion, hair colour and physique looking more like my mothers side).

so.. I'd more be looking at the hairloss pattern you're developing and deciding which side of the family you're taking after... rather than being concerned that you're going to have more aggressive hairloss
 
Top