Who is that?
By the way transgender operations are a totally different thing and thus it's a poor analogy. A cosmetic surgery is meant to get better treatment from society, whereas a transgender operation is meant to get different treatment from society and to recognize oneself in the mirror.
Further, the social repercussions are different. Women getting botox or men getting hair transplants affects the general market as beauty is a zero-sum game. If you have 10% of people becoming prettier, then the other 90% of people necessarily become uglier, and thus there is inevitable pressure on them as well to get into the game. In contrast there can be no such pressure propagation from intersex surgeries. The total number of trans and intersex individuals is no more than a generous one in a hundred regardless of how you count, and thus it will not affect the rest of society.
The analogy does not hold.
I don't necessarily think these are as different as you suggest. Anyone I think I've known personally who gets cosmetic surgery done has done so because
they want to like what they see in the mirror.
Women I know with fake boobs typically got them because
they wanted bigger tits in the same way that I use hairloss treatments and would undergo a surgery that could make me an eternal NW1 because I like having hair; a favourable reaction from society is certainly a bonus and in the age of social media, an incentive for many, I'm sure — but I don't think the motivations between the two procedures are inherently worlds apart.
Anyway, that insanely hot girl is a Mexican actress named "Eiza Gonzalez". She plays Santanico Pandemonium in the Netflix version of "From Dusk Til Dawn" and is "Darling" in the upcoming "Baby Driver", which I am so f*****g amped for.
Well now I've brought up the MGTOW thing when I'm not hugely versed in their beliefs, but iirc their base is about men's rights (divorce settlements, custody etc) positive discrimination etc. These things are indeed important but I find the break off groups from MGTOW, or less "official" stances are based more on theories than facts, and this is more attractive to the ranting frustrated average incel than actual issues.
I've always been open to the idea of hypergamy and the coper inside me wants to believe it's bullshit, I simply don't know as I don't think it's a solid enough argument to even begin to investigate. It's all purely anecdotal really, and I like the fact you think it's just extreme sh*t.
Confirmation bias is a huge problem with them and reflectively a huge problem with this forum. There's that much red pill "literature" out there that you can apply any situation you want to fit into your narrow dark box.
The problem I have with their "hypergamy" argument is that it takes primitive animal behavior (Brifault's law) and uses it to reduce the far more complex social interactions of humans.
This is best demonstrated in their videos about "Hypergamy" and "Branch Swinging/sh*t Testing"
In the opening of the former video, the guy acknowledges the problems with its application to humans and even says "There are many instances where women have proven the first corollary of Brifault's law false"...yeah, it's almost like it's
bullshit. In the latter video, the guy conveniently leaves out "looks" as something that men can offer as attractive to females and doesn't see the error in exclusively dating women from apps or bars and it's not like he's asking out the cute bartender girl; he's going for the ones trying to call as much attention to themselves as possible and is surprised when it turns out she's a gold digger.
Lastly, in one of their articles, they use tweets from women about how they want to ride Chris Brown and some other celebrity despite their criminal and abusive pasts. "Because hypergamy bro!" they literally reduce it to "women want these men because they're rich and famous" not because these male celebrities are jacked, fullheads and conventionally attractive men by modern standards — nope, it
must be money.
Like, Eiza Gonzalez up there might be a real b**ch who beats on her boyfriends for all I know — but do you think that would stop men from salivating over her?
For guys claiming to be disciples of the red pill, they're blue-pilled
as f***. All it does is fill the heads of fat, balding frat fucks with the idea that if they just get enough money and status and maybe lift some weights, that is all they need for the hottest women on Earth to love them and if she rejects or dumps you, it's only because your bank account slipped.
None of these guys are thinking "Hypergamy" when a woman actually agrees to date them.
