New hairs have grown

[TomSchulte]

Hello community,

some time ago I started a thread in this forum.

A visited my coiffeur last month and the Coiffeur recommended a shampoo to me. It uses ethereous oils to improve the blood circulation of the scalp. It is a System of a shampoo, a conditioner and a leave-in-product.

Since then I only used the shampoo, because I don't want to use 3 products every time I get a shower and wash my hair.

Some days ago I looked on my scalp and I saw, that small hairs have grown at the upper part of the head. The hairs are 1 cm to 1 1/4 cm long. I think that the hairs must have grown since the end of october. The first treatment with the shampoo and the conditioner and the leave-in-product must already have helped to regrow my hair. Is that possible? I think that is strange.


I have 2 theories how it might have worked:

1. Improvement of the blood circulation of my scalp by the ethereous oils and by that strengthening of the roots of the hair and so new hairs can grow. Is that possible? For weeks, I am using only the shampoo any more.

2. The scalp was always reddened and irritated and now it's less itching at some parts of the scalp. And I don't have scurf on my head any more. And the coiffeur sad, the scalp is less reddened, so my hairs can grow again.


The problem with both theories is:
The back of the head, the neck and the lateral hairs on my scalp have always been washed with the same shampoo as the upper part of the head, but the hair density at the back of the head, the neck and the lateral hairs on my scalp is much better than the hair density on the upper part of my head. And the skin on the back of my head, the neck and the lateral hairs on my scalp was always full of scurfs and irritated. And the skin was itching at the back of the head, the neck and the lateral hairs on my scalp, too.

For years, I have been using shampoos (natural cosmetics and conventional cosmetics) with Silicone. So I think that remains of Silicone can't remain on the scalp for years?

Only the upper part of my head was always been thinning out, but I don't loose hair really. Perhaps 10-15 hairs per day.

What do you think about my theories?

Meanwhile, the scalp at the back of the head, the neck and the lateral hairs is white and not red any more. And I don't have scurfs any more. But the scalp is still itching everywhere. And the scalp on the upper part of the head is still reddened.

I hope that someone will answer my questions.

Thanks in advance.

Tom

If you have any questions, then feel free to ask.

I have added some photos now.

 

[TomSchulte]

http://imgur.com/a/SWNDK/layout/grid

Here are many new photos.

 

[zdm632]

There is no such thing as "hair roots breathing from the air".
Hair roots are deep under the skin, they never make contact with exterior air, and they don't "breathe" air from the outside.
They take all the oxygen/nutrients from blood, through tiny vessels.

 

[TomSchulte]

Do you mean this part of my posting?

I have 3 theories how it might have worked:
1. Remains of silicone on my scalp were removed by the shampoo and the other 2 products. All roots of my hairs can "breathe" freely again and the hairs can grow again without interruption.

When you think this theory is nonsense, I will erase it from my post.

 

[dps]

Do you mean this part of my posting?

I have 3 theories how it might have worked:
1. Remains of silicone on my scalp were removed by the shampoo and the other 2 products. All roots of my hairs can "breathe" freely again and the hairs can grow again without interruption.

When you think this theory is nonsense, I will erase it from my post.

its not nonsense zdm is just too stupid to understand that by ''breathing'' you meant healthy circulation of natural oils and other stuff the body produces, also it is proven that our skin absorbs oxygen from the outside.

 

[zdm632]

its not nonsense zdm is just too stupid to understand that by ''breathing'' you meant healthy circulation of natural oils and other stuff the body produces, also it is proven that our skin absorbs oxygen from the outside.

Oh, right, so now everyone has a definition of "breathing"...
Skin absorbs oxygen only in the epidermis(0.2 mm), and it's a very low amount. It doesn't have anything to do with the hair root.
Read again-i commented about the expression "hair ROOTS breathing".
There is no such thing as the hair root breathing,or "breathing" including that "oil circulation" triviality.

 

[TomSchulte]

Thanks for the answer.

I never use wax to style the hairs. After taking a shower, I only make loft drying for the hairs.

I have a curl on my crown like many other people, too.

The photos where I am in Venice, are from June 2006. The other photos were made some weeks or months ago, but in any case in the year 2014.

Some days ago I went to a dermatologist. He made a trichoscan and told me that I have alopecia androgenetica.
He told me that he can see miniaturized hairs on my crown.

The dermatologist told me that the roots of my hairs produce many miniaturized hairs instead of terminal hairs.


But when I look at my head, I see new hairs everywhere.

They are 3-4 cm long.

I had a nose surgery this year in April with general anaesthesia.

Can such a general anaesthesia or nose surgery affect the hair growth?


But I want to emphasize that I never loose many hairs. I loose 10-15 hairs per day and that for years. Not more than 10-15 hairs, not on a single day, for many months now.

Years ago, when I had scurf, my shoulders were always white from the scurf, and together with the scurf, there were also hairs on my shoulders.
But that was years ago.


The scalp was always reddened and irritated and now it's less itching at some parts of the scalp. And I don't have scurf on my head any more. And the coiffeur sad, the scalp is less reddened, so my hairs can grow again.

Is that correct?

- - - Updated - - -

Is everyone sure that you see thinner / miniaturized hairs on my head?

I think they have a color. But miniaturized hairs don't have a color, they must be unpigmented, am I right?

But they are very rigid and inflexible and when I try to comb them, it does not work.

- - - Updated - - -

My mother and father have full hair. My father is 68 years old now and has relatively full hair for his age.

The parents and grandparents of my mother and father had mostly full hair until the age of 70-80.

No one with a bald head in my Family.

 

[zzzzz]

"new hairs"

hairs aren't new. They have life cycles. In order to get "new hairs" there would need to be a reversal of the miniaturization process. Since this product does not inhibit DHT, even if hypohetcally it did work short term, it will never work long term.

What you are likely seeing is just miniaturized hairs that are getting ever smaller, not "new" stronger hairs.


and hair doesn't breathe it get's it's oxygen from the blood just like every other cell in the body. The hair structure itself is dead so don't need anything, I am talking about the follicle.

your hairloss will slowly get worse

Try finasteride if you want to legitimately stop your hairloss

 

[TomSchulte]

Thanks for the answer.

I had a nose surgery this year in April with general anaesthesia.

Can such a general anaesthesia or nose surgery affect the hair growth?


But I want to emphasize that I never loose many hairs. I loose 10-15 hairs per day and that for years. Not more than 10-15 hairs, not on a single day, for many months now.

Years ago, when I had scurf, my shoulders were always white from the scurf, and together with the scurf, there were also hairs on my shoulders.
But that was years ago.


The scalp was always reddened and irritated and now it's less itching at some parts of the scalp. And I don't have scurf on my head any more. And the coiffeur sad, the scalp is less reddened, so my hairs can grow again.

Is that correct?

 

[zzzzz]

Thanks for the answer.

I had a nose surgery this year in April with general anaesthesia.

Can such a general anaesthesia or nose surgery affect the hair growth?


But I want to emphasize that I never loose many hairs. I loose 10-15 hairs per day and that for years. Not more than 10-15 hairs, not on a single day, for many months now.

Years ago, when I had scurf, my shoulders were always white from the scurf, and together with the scurf, there were also hairs on my shoulders.
But that was years ago.


The scalp was always reddened and irritated and now it's less itching at some parts of the scalp. And I don't have scurf on my head any more. And the coiffeur sad, the scalp is less reddened, so my hairs can grow again.

Is that correct?

not if it's male pattern baldness. DHT is the only reason your hair is thinning

 

[hellouser]

I can't believe how ignorant people are on the topic of male pattern baldness...

 

[SayifDoit]

I can't believe how ignorant people are on the topic of male pattern baldness...

reason why lazer therapy is bull

 

[TomSchulte]

@hellouser

who is ignorant? what do you mean? I don't understand what you want. Please explain what you want in more than one sentence.

Please explain what you want in a complete sentence so that everyone can understand what you want.


@sayifdoit

I don't understand what you want.

Please explain what you want.

One useless sentence is not good.

What do you mean? Laser therapy for what?

Please explain what you want in a complete sentence so that everyone can understand what you want.

- - - Updated - - -

I have noticed another thing:

The hairs that have grown in the last weeks, the hairs that grow again at parts of the head that seemed to be empty, are much darker than my other hairs. They are also much more inflexible than my other hairs.

These hairs are dark brown or nearly black, and relatively stiff. If I want to bend them in a direction, they return to their former Position again.
My natural hair color is ash blond. So I can clearly see these dark brown or nearly black.
I found these hairs near my temples and at my crown.
I thought it must be 10-15 hairs at my temples and 10-15 hairs at my crown that are so dark.

Can someone explain me what these hairs are? Vellus hairs or miniaturized hairs have no pigmentation. New terminal hairs?
I think you can see these hairs on my photos, too.

I would be glad if someone could answer my questions.

Thanks in advance.

Tom