- Reaction score
- 544
They should be sued for prescribing you. Money hungry fucks. You don’t have male pattern baldness and you’ll probably have a full head of hair when you’re 80.
Ok Final One What Are Your Thoughts?
- Thread starter Sseoud86
- Start date
Thanks man. And I know right. I even messaged the Doctor and he seemed admiment I could either monitor or start and that it wouldn't hurt if I didn't have male pattern baldness other than the potential for sides. I mean I was left confused. I wonder how many people are over prescribed.
If you think you're thinning you probably are. Can't tell in these pictures cause there's no before and after but if you really think there's thinning I'd prob get on finasteride. The side effect profile is really rare and it's not even that strong of a DHT blocker. You're also in your 30's so you'v prob got a really good chance of maintaining for a long time. Best of luck either way
Its always possible there is some hair loss hard to see in pictures, but I dont see any hair loss at all. People here have a better eye than most, and I dont think even they could spot even a little hair loss.
You have nothing to worry about now, but no one is ever safe from the male pattern baldness boogeyman. You could go from Norwood 1 to Norwood 4 in a year although I think its less likely as you get older.
You have nothing to worry about now, but no one is ever safe from the male pattern baldness boogeyman. You could go from Norwood 1 to Norwood 4 in a year although I think its less likely as you get older.
Doesnt matter. Most people with common sense wont take a drug they dont need at all. Over prescribed doesnt mean that many people actually decide to do it.
- Reaction score
- 191
He has no data to support saying that propecia doesn’t have the potential to hurt your hair. There are reports online that propecia apparantly made their hair worse. It’s probably a low chance but why risk it if you have no hair loss
- Reaction score
- 2
You are find bro.... Lots of us have WAY worse off hair.