That's because it probably didn't happen.
Why do you have me on ignore again ?Sure, that explains why, in most young (teens-20s and sometimes early 30s) couples (at least in european countries), the girl is always at least 1-2 points less attractive than the guy, in Italy, sometimes, even 3 points. Looskmatched young couples are rare these days, not to mention in Italy, where you see tall, muscular attractive fullheads with shitty, chubby girls.
Not to mention the comparison male/female "problems".
View attachment 60417
I'm trying to stay in reality instead of believing in some incel fantasy. That's it.
Normal people don't do that.
I'm too NT to believe this sh*t, sorry.
*In front of C4L*
"Lol it was so fun when you took me behind the dumpster yesterday!"
"I know right!"
Totally believable.
Nothing out of the ordinary here.
So why you don't believe?
what are your credentials? *sips coffee*
Your estimation is too high, let's take my workplace for example.
We have 10 bangable girls, you're telling me that if a good-looking guy waltzes in, 6 of these girls won't turn the guy down if he tries to flirt with them?
When they talk to each other, they'll all agree that they'd like to have sex with that particular guy?
Absolutely not realistic. Damn, where are the girls of the forum? They could easily refute your nonsense.
All that numbers do not matter IRL.
He won't need to approach every girl and ask her for sex – that's a barony of PUAcels. He would go to a club/bar and will meet a casual group of girls there will be a few who will give him direct interests. He will choose one from them and bang her afterward. That's how it works for good looking males. Again, they don't need to prove anything. They will leave big numbers theory with thousand of approaches to the PUA.
Could aforementioned algorithm misfire? Sure. A girl can notice his weirdness, rotten molar tooth or nose hair in a process of communication and [politely] reject him. She could have "days" or stomach sick.
"A few." I like that better.
Sex is not guaranteed though.
They could make out and then it's not always easy to go from there to sex.
The pool shrinks even more. 10% of girls.
I know, I know, it's already extremely high compared to ugly guys who get 0%, and average guys who get lucky once in a blue moon.
Could aforementioned algorithm misfire? Sure. A girl can notice his weirdness, rotten molar tooth or nose hair in a process of communication and [politely] reject him. She could have "days" or stomach sick.
I thought "to make out" means sex, doesn't it? Or just kissing and etc?
To make out = kissing.
And to make out certainly doesn't mean sex.
My friends make out with several girls when we go out.
It doesn't mean sh*t.
Of course, your chance is going to be higher than with a girl who gives you this look:
![]()
But kissing a girl is way easier than managing to have sex with her.
I remember this French reality TV show where this pretty boy (who was like only 19 or something) bragged about having been with 700 girls.
He was like "I swear, 700 girls" and he stood his ground, only to admit at a point that yes, he counted all the make-out sessions in his number.
Sorry mate. I actually believe you now as you definitely are bringing some real world experiences into the whole "good looking guys just have to show up and take their pick" narrative.Guys who have never experienced one night stands or flings don't even believe it's possible.
I've been called a liar many times. @blackg
Yep, and I too are waiting for the female members to come in on this.Your estimation is too high, let's take my workplace for example.
We have 10 bangable girls, you're telling me that if a good-looking guy waltzes in, 6 of these girls won't turn the guy down if he tries to flirt with them?
When they talk to each other, they'll all agree that they'd like to have sex with that particular guy?
Absolutely not realistic. Damn, where are the girls of the forum? They could easily refute your nonsense.
I had this one time where the girl hadn't shaved in months.
I insisted anyway since I hadn't had sex in 3 months (slayer problems).
Bad idea.
Yep, and I too are waiting for the female members to come in on this.
I'm confident that they will back your position, WPB.
Sorry but his position is way more realistic then your delusional fear of the all conquering chad.He doesn't have a position only a theoretical arguing with himself what percentage of women are ready to f*** an abstract "slayer".
Without being concrete in details nobody is able to provide him an answer.
Sorry but his position is way more realistic then your delusional fear of the all conquering chad.
No I can't.Excuse me, can you provide the exact quotation of what my position is?