Pick Two And Give Reasons

marco75

Established Member
Reaction score
74
All else being equal, which two features would you choose

1) Being tall (6ft1+) otherwise you are < 5ft 9
2) Full head of hair (NW1) otherwise you are Norwood 4+
3) Aesthetic face (8+) otherwise you are average 5-6 or below.

I would pick 1 and 3, because there is still hope that it can be improved whereas the other two are unfixable.
 

Saurabhaj

Senior Member
Reaction score
1,239
I am at average level indian Height,
Nw6.
About Face..my one cousin sister
Said..your face has a grace,it will save you.

thats enough..I indirectly answered to your question.
 

Afro_Vacancy

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
11,939
All else being equal, which two features would you choose

1) Being tall (6ft1+) otherwise you are < 5ft 9
2) Full head of hair (NW1) otherwise you are Norwood 4+
3) Aesthetic face (8+) otherwise you are average 5-6 or below.

I would pick 1 and 3, because there is still hope that it can be improved whereas the other two are unfixable.

1+3: Jason Statham, Michael Jordan
1+2: Tom Hanks, Ron Perlman
2+3: Andrew Garflied, Tom Cruise, Robert Downey Jr.

Of those three, I'd pick category 1.

Though members of both category 1 and category 3 can attract women, members of category 1 can also be leaders of men, and wil have better self-image because they will see a man staring back at them everytime they look into the mirror.
 

xetudor

Established Member
Reaction score
127
2 + 3 for life. Awesome hair + handsome face, hell yeah. I don't care about having long bones nor do I care about what women find attractive.
 

marco75

Established Member
Reaction score
74
2 + 3 for life. Awesome hair + handsome face, hell yeah. I don't care about having long bones nor do I care about what women find attractive.

That's good because being short is an attraction killer for women. See all the tinder profiles (must be 6ft+). After face height is of huge importance and you can never get taller.
 

Saurabhaj

Senior Member
Reaction score
1,239
I am excited to see who is willing to rule out option 3.

It will take too much of a Dare to leave option 3.

Face and hair is safe bet,
Face plus height is ambitious bet.
Height plus hair only is :0
 
Last edited:

Roberto_72

Moderator
Moderator
My Regimen
Reaction score
4,504
I would pick 1 and 2.
Why? Because I want to see the difference.
I am average height and have a symmetrical face but shitty hair.
So, for me it's tall and full of hair.
Then I would bend my head and ask ladies to pet my curls!
 

Dante92

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
3,695
I would pick 1 and 2.
Why? Because I want to see the difference.
I am average height and have a symmetrical face but shitty hair.
So, for me it's tall and full of hair.
Then I would bend my head and ask ladies to pet my curls!

418a1fc9d1d9d22822285799eaf14458.jpg
 

Roberto_72

Moderator
Moderator
My Regimen
Reaction score
4,504

Afro_Vacancy

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
11,939
That's good because being short is an attraction killer for women. See all the tinder profiles (must be 6ft+). After face height is of huge importance and you can never get taller.

It's a rule for a lot of women. Chemistry is not even relevant here, if a man is below her height threshold she won't even give him the 2-second evaluation. She will consciously reject him.

This woman I've been hanging out with told me her last four partners are 5'9, 6'1, 6'4, and 6'4. She said the 5'9 guy was her experimenting with building a relationship on personality rather than sexual chemistry, and that it didn't work.

She's also built up an ideological framework around this: says man who are not tall have "short man syndrome" whereby they have fragile egos and need to be in control and be obeyed ... maybe she's right though?

She's approximately 5'4.
 

xetudor

Established Member
Reaction score
127
That's good because being short is an attraction killer for women. See all the tinder profiles (must be 6ft+). After face height is of huge importance and you can never get taller.

I don't care. There is p**rn and a ton on entertainment to spend your life on. I honestly don't get this women worshiping and I've been in a relationship with a girl for 10 years.

She's also built up an ideological framework around this: says man who are not tall have "short man syndrome" whereby they have fragile egos and need to be in control and be obeyed ... maybe she's right though?

More likes she doesn't stand shorter men so they piss her off while taller men get a pass with her.
 

marco75

Established Member
Reaction score
74
If you picked 1 + 3 you win,

Face > Height > Hair

1+3 = Bruce Willis
2+3 = Daniel Radcliffe
1+2 = Kramer
 

I.D WALKER

Senior Member
Reaction score
868
I'm a pragmatic guy.
Challenge 3 already picks on me,
so 3 it must be.

Besides I wouldn't dare disappoint anyone. :cool:
 
Last edited:
Top