Just to start out with here, I don’t want anything to be misconstrued; I personally do believe finasteride CAN cause persistent symptoms, including Peyronie’s. I have not reached this conclusion on any substantial amount of data, but purely on anecdotal reports. This is a personal conclusion I have reached, and does not fit in with my objective, scientific-minded interpretation of the data. This might not make sense to you, but maybe it does.
You are correct; lower Testosterone levels could contribute to the development of Peyronie’s disease. However, Finasteride is not known to reduce Testosterone levels. Quite the opposite; it is known to raise T to some degree. People have claimed Finasteride lowered their T levels, but I have yet to see any data that supports this. I think you may be confused that people suffer from symptoms that mimic low T levels (hypogonadism) but their T levels are often well within normal ranges. Even for those outside normal ranges, there are rarely baseline results to actually compare them with. Additional factors such as lifestyle changes may also affect T levels quite significantly. It is possible finasteride could cause some sort of physiological resistance to T, but again, I’ve not seen anything that supports these types of theories. Anecdotal reports, including but not limited to those on Propeciahelp cannot be used as accurate data. There are simply too many variables involved, most notably, lack of baseline values. This highlights the importance of getting full hormonal tests done BEFORE taking finasteride.
I don’t understand why you mention Merck taking down the Propecia website. This is actually quite a standard practice for any company undergoing lawsuits; remove, review and revise the marketing material to ensure nothing can be used against them. The website is back up right now, and aside from the layout, nothing has changed save the changes in side effects to reflect their product insert. I don’t find this the least bit strange or unexpected. It certainly doesn’t indicate Merck is admitting guilt.
The examiner webpage you link to simply consists of conspiracy theory-esque speculation and anecdotal reports. John Peige clearly has a strong bias against Finasteride and Merck, as he has over a dozen articles against Finasteride. Again, anecdotal reports, even in a large quantity, do not imply any sort of causation.
Finasteride does not currently have a black box warning, where did you get this information from?
You are correct; lower Testosterone levels could contribute to the development of Peyronie’s disease. However, Finasteride is not known to reduce Testosterone levels. Quite the opposite; it is known to raise T to some degree. People have claimed Finasteride lowered their T levels, but I have yet to see any data that supports this. I think you may be confused that people suffer from symptoms that mimic low T levels (hypogonadism) but their T levels are often well within normal ranges. Even for those outside normal ranges, there are rarely baseline results to actually compare them with. Additional factors such as lifestyle changes may also affect T levels quite significantly. It is possible finasteride could cause some sort of physiological resistance to T, but again, I’ve not seen anything that supports these types of theories. Anecdotal reports, including but not limited to those on Propeciahelp cannot be used as accurate data. There are simply too many variables involved, most notably, lack of baseline values. This highlights the importance of getting full hormonal tests done BEFORE taking finasteride.
I don’t understand why you mention Merck taking down the Propecia website. This is actually quite a standard practice for any company undergoing lawsuits; remove, review and revise the marketing material to ensure nothing can be used against them. The website is back up right now, and aside from the layout, nothing has changed save the changes in side effects to reflect their product insert. I don’t find this the least bit strange or unexpected. It certainly doesn’t indicate Merck is admitting guilt.
The examiner webpage you link to simply consists of conspiracy theory-esque speculation and anecdotal reports. John Peige clearly has a strong bias against Finasteride and Merck, as he has over a dozen articles against Finasteride. Again, anecdotal reports, even in a large quantity, do not imply any sort of causation.
Finasteride does not currently have a black box warning, where did you get this information from?