lol this is so true. I think its kinda a mechanism of defense, people not wanting to be disappointed.
Probably
I said min and wounding not min and finasteride for which there is no proof at all Follicas concept is superior.
Superior? Maybe not, but we can say for sure that it won't be worse since it's the same kind of tech. The good news is: Wounding + minoxidil so far has produced great results.
But Follica is far more controlled, better-researched, and we know there will be more than a single compound, and they intend for it to be a direct competitor to transplants. So the only logical assumption there is that it should wind up being better. Doesn't really make sense to have a more complicated, higher-tech procedure that's only "just as good".
Regardless, my point stands — you and a lot of others on here like to constantly draw contrary, negative conclusions from blatantly obvious, positive results. I don't know why you do this, but it really makes you look retarded to be honest.