1. You brain is weak.
2. I never said Replicel cares for baldies. That's you talking, dunce. I think Replicel cares for making money.
3. Some baldies ARE investors.
4. Negative talk about a stock can affect the stock price so they care if there are negative rumors swirling around about their company.
5. I don't even know for sure that Replicel looks at this site. That's why I put the word "if" in my sentence when I said "if replicel reads these posts.
1. Proof or source? Surely you smart guy who quotes studies all over the thread but doesn't even know "by three orders of magnitude" means x1000 has the strongest brain on this forum (just happen to come across that post, don't take me for those psychos who search through a thousand posts to find fault in someone).
2. You clearly indicated that.
3. Some? To what percentage? Does that change the big picture that investors are in for the money and are reluctant to move forward unless ENOUGH interest is foreseeable, which has been proven time and time again, e.g. with aderan and intercytex?
4. Agree.
5. This is irrelevant. Any one who can read can tell what you mean from the context. And just as you said, we are talking about the general moods of the public instead of forum readers.
Please don't type back to continue this useless debate and let's spend our energy on what this forum section is meant for.
Despite your attacking while refusing to respond to my well grounded previous post, I'll just quote your post here for the other (educated)forum members to judge.a) If you didn't want to carry on the discussion then why did you post to me dumbass?
b) I disagree with everything you said wherein your position differs from mine.
c) FU.
Let's hope so. But nobody knows anything, until their data is released...How optimistic are people about this treatment, I hate to get my hopes up about anything. Would this potentially make finasteride unnecessary?
If I understand the method, then in theory it should. If i've learnt anything from my brief time lurking this forum though, then somebody will be along shortly with a harsh dose of realityLet's hope so. But nobody knows anything, until their data is released...
On February 7 we announced a brokered private placement for up to $2 million,” stated Lee Buckler, RepliCel President and CEO. “That we were able to quickly close a financing with brokered and non-brokered components totaling over $3.1 million is a testament to the belief investors have in our near-term catalysts, upside potential, and execution. We look forward to our clinical data announcements in the weeks to come and providing the market with further updates on our device program and other projects.”
Edit: they just tweeted this. I'm in my phone now, can't paste the source.
If Replicel tweeted this then they should release the data within 3 1/2 weeks - by March 31 at the latest. If they don't release the data by March 31st then they're implementing another delay. Let's do a poll - who thinks Replicel will implement another delay?
We could do a poll too see if members think you've ever cracked a smile?
LOL.
Replicel gives me NOTHING to smile about. I think lots of posters are unhappy with Replicel right about now.
My hopes right now are with Follica.
He is just a human with human's problems.These goofs actually used this pic https://mobile.twitter.com/RepliCel/status/837392112559788034?ref_src=twsrc^google|twcamp^serp|twgr^tweet
I mean even if it did have decent results, not professional at all. Using a prince as an example? No class
But what about Shiseidos involvement and investment though ?I'm very confident at this point that Replicel is a bullshit company and they're just milking the penny stock for the options:
- linkedin shows 5 employees - 2 chairman, a director, and the ceo. NO research positions listed. *doesn't mean there aren't more but suspiciously absent*
- Buckler (CEO) and Rogers (Director) both were/are lawyers. The chairman, Jensen, appears to be in securities law.
- All three of the above named individuals ALSO have other jobs.
- Buckler's other job is as CEO of another biotech penny stock called Hemostemix. Let's take a look at how that's done since 2013 when he started as CEO:
- View attachment 49839
I find the lack of current employees rather suspicious. There are a large number of former employees. I haven't even begun reading over the shoddy financial and corporate documents. OTC financials, it's going to be entertaining I'm sure.
I think they've made a profession of chairing, directing, and otherwise leading failed biotechs that are publicly traded under these loosely regulated exchanges. The options are motivation enough, just bleed investors for a few more years. Being sure to publish data in speculative bull markets that make the past research seem viable enough to propel the stock. Being rather "lawyerly" in the process so as not to commit any sort of fraud. All quite legal.
But what about Shiseidos involvement and investment though ?
I'm very confident at this point that Replicel is a bullshit company and they're just milking the penny stock for the options:
- linkedin shows 5 employees - 2 chairman, a director, and the ceo. NO research positions listed. *doesn't mean there aren't more but suspiciously absent*
- Buckler (CEO) and Rogers (Director) both were/are lawyers. The chairman, Jensen, appears to be in securities law.
- All three of the above named individuals ALSO have other jobs.
- Buckler's other job is as CEO of another biotech penny stock called Hemostemix. Let's take a look at how that's done since 2013 when he started as CEO:
- View attachment 49839
I find the lack of current employees rather suspicious. There are a large number of former employees. I haven't even begun reading over the shoddy financial and corporate documents. OTC financials, it's going to be entertaining I'm sure.
I think they've made a profession of chairing, directing, and otherwise leading failed biotechs that are publicly traded under these loosely regulated exchanges. The options are motivation enough, just bleed investors for a few more years. Being sure to publish data in speculative bull markets that make the past research seem viable enough to propel the stock. Being rather "lawyerly" in the process so as not to commit any sort of fraud. All quite legal.