Replicel Is On Fire Lately — Data In Feb.

champpy

Experienced Member
Reaction score
1,118
Has Shesiedo made any statements about their progress or is replicel the only ones who can release statements and info?
 

tress_dreams

Member
Reaction score
24
I'm cautiously optimistic that some level of maintenance can be achieved from replicel. I'd pay for it in order to compliment the .25mg daily finasteride I take.

I doubt it's any sort of miracle. Word would have gotten out over the last 5+ years. They probably wouldn't be working on complimentary lines in aging and tendonitis either. These other lines of research seem like a way to support the companies valuation and their salaries as a hedge against the less than extraordinary promise that is their hair efforts.

I'll still pay 1k-1.5k for maintenance treatments once a year. I doubt I'm alone. Here's hoping we at least get that.

As an aside, the stock is an interesting play too; so little market cap. If any of these lines of research pan out in a serious way allergan and the likes will gladly pay massively. With them releasing multiple pieces of data at once it limits the potential downside when the hair data is shown less effective. So limited downside risk and potential upside return if you can buy-n-hold for years.
 

WMQ

Experienced Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
374
1. You brain is weak.

2. I never said Replicel cares for baldies. That's you talking, dunce. I think Replicel cares for making money.

3. Some baldies ARE investors.

4. Negative talk about a stock can affect the stock price so they care if there are negative rumors swirling around about their company.

5. I don't even know for sure that Replicel looks at this site. That's why I put the word "if" in my sentence when I said "if replicel reads these posts.

1. Proof or source? Surely you smart guy who quotes studies all over the thread but doesn't even know "by three orders of magnitude" means x1000 has the strongest brain on this forum (just happen to come across that post, don't take me for those psychos who search through a thousand posts to find fault in someone).

2. You clearly indicated that.

3. Some? To what percentage? Does that change the big picture that investors are in for the money and are reluctant to move forward unless ENOUGH interest is foreseeable, which has been proven time and time again, e.g. with aderan and intercytex?

4. Agree.

5. This is irrelevant. Any one who can read can tell what you mean from the context. And just as you said, we are talking about the general moods of the public instead of forum readers.

Please don't type back to continue this useless debate and let's spend our energy on what this forum section is meant for.
 

nameless

Banned
Reaction score
1,091
1. Proof or source? Surely you smart guy who quotes studies all over the thread but doesn't even know "by three orders of magnitude" means x1000 has the strongest brain on this forum (just happen to come across that post, don't take me for those psychos who search through a thousand posts to find fault in someone).

2. You clearly indicated that.

3. Some? To what percentage? Does that change the big picture that investors are in for the money and are reluctant to move forward unless ENOUGH interest is foreseeable, which has been proven time and time again, e.g. with aderan and intercytex?

4. Agree.

5. This is irrelevant. Any one who can read can tell what you mean from the context. And just as you said, we are talking about the general moods of the public instead of forum readers.

Please don't type back to continue this useless debate and let's spend our energy on what this forum section is meant for.

a) If you didn't want to carry on the discussion then why did you post to me dumbass?

b) I disagree with everything you said wherein your position differs from mine.

c) FU.
 

WMQ

Experienced Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
374
a) If you didn't want to carry on the discussion then why did you post to me dumbass?

b) I disagree with everything you said wherein your position differs from mine.

c) FU.
Despite your attacking while refusing to respond to my well grounded previous post, I'll just quote your post here for the other (educated)forum members to judge.

You're on my ignore list now. Keeping posting and embarrassing yourself is welcomed. :)
 

Breaking Bald

Established Member
Reaction score
61
Why must we be tortured, when are they going to release the data!? I've noticed that they have been deleting people's comments on their facebook page as well.
 

JJ2017

Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
2
How optimistic are people about this treatment, I hate to get my hopes up about anything. Would this potentially make finasteride unnecessary?
 

br1

Senior Member
Reaction score
2,163
How optimistic are people about this treatment, I hate to get my hopes up about anything. Would this potentially make finasteride unnecessary?
Let's hope so. But nobody knows anything, until their data is released...
 

JJ2017

Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
2
Let's hope so. But nobody knows anything, until their data is released...
If I understand the method, then in theory it should. If i've learnt anything from my brief time lurking this forum though, then somebody will be along shortly with a harsh dose of reality
 

nameless

Banned
Reaction score
1,091
On February 7 we announced a brokered private placement for up to $2 million,” stated Lee Buckler, RepliCel President and CEO. “That we were able to quickly close a financing with brokered and non-brokered components totaling over $3.1 million is a testament to the belief investors have in our near-term catalysts, upside potential, and execution. We look forward to our clinical data announcements in the weeks to come and providing the market with further updates on our device program and other projects.”

Edit: they just tweeted this. I'm in my phone now, can't paste the source.

If Replicel tweeted this then they should release the data within 3 1/2 weeks...by March 31 at the latest. If they don't release the data by March 31st then they're implementing another delay. Let's do a poll - who thinks Replicel will implement another delay?
 
Last edited:

tress_dreams

Member
Reaction score
24
I'm very confident at this point that Replicel is a bullshit company and they're just milking the penny stock for the options:

  • linkedin shows 5 employees - 2 chairman, a director, and the ceo. NO research positions listed. *doesn't mean there aren't more but suspiciously absent*
  • Buckler (CEO) and Rogers (Director) both were/are lawyers. The chairman, Jensen, appears to be in securities law.
  • All three of the above named individuals ALSO have other jobs.
  • Buckler's other job is as CEO of another biotech penny stock called Hemostemix. Let's take a look at how that's done since 2013 when he started as CEO:
  • Screen Shot 2017-03-05 at 1.01.55 AM.png

I find the lack of current employees rather suspicious. There are a large number of former employees. I haven't even begun reading over the shoddy financial and corporate documents. OTC financials, it's going to be entertaining I'm sure.

I think they've made a profession of chairing, directing, and otherwise leading failed biotechs that are publicly traded under these loosely regulated exchanges. The options are motivation enough, just bleed investors for a few more years. Being sure to publish data in speculative bull markets that make the past research seem viable enough to propel the stock. Being rather "lawyerly" in the process so as not to commit any sort of fraud. All quite legal.
 

Gonewiththehair

New Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
11
I'm very confident at this point that Replicel is a bullshit company and they're just milking the penny stock for the options:

  • linkedin shows 5 employees - 2 chairman, a director, and the ceo. NO research positions listed. *doesn't mean there aren't more but suspiciously absent*
  • Buckler (CEO) and Rogers (Director) both were/are lawyers. The chairman, Jensen, appears to be in securities law.
  • All three of the above named individuals ALSO have other jobs.
  • Buckler's other job is as CEO of another biotech penny stock called Hemostemix. Let's take a look at how that's done since 2013 when he started as CEO:
  • View attachment 49839

I find the lack of current employees rather suspicious. There are a large number of former employees. I haven't even begun reading over the shoddy financial and corporate documents. OTC financials, it's going to be entertaining I'm sure.

I think they've made a profession of chairing, directing, and otherwise leading failed biotechs that are publicly traded under these loosely regulated exchanges. The options are motivation enough, just bleed investors for a few more years. Being sure to publish data in speculative bull markets that make the past research seem viable enough to propel the stock. Being rather "lawyerly" in the process so as not to commit any sort of fraud. All quite legal.
But what about Shiseidos involvement and investment though ?
 

tress_dreams

Member
Reaction score
24
But what about Shiseidos involvement and investment though ?

I'm curious too. I want to know if Shseido is obligated to share their research and advancements with Replicel. If not they may have merely procured Replicel's original methodologies (through the partnership) to bootstrap, augment or otherwise support their own research. Making several small investments and partnerships with potential solutions in a space doesn't seem unusual. Anyone privileged to the terms of the contract? I want to believe Shseido is still advancing their own research/techniques.
 

Follisket

Established Member
Reaction score
288
If their results turn out sh*t and the whole thing gets canned, I hope they get torn to shreds.

With the tweets and statements they've been making all the while they had insight into the results -
That kind of deception isn't just "clever marketing", it isn't "business" or "cunning". It is a sick, psychopatic abuse of people's mental health.

For f***'s sake, we're not talking about a new flavour of ice cream or a fun new gadget here. The disorder can fuel suicidal thoughts yet someone wants to make fraudulent money off it?!
 

kawnshawn

Established Member
Reaction score
414
I'm very confident at this point that Replicel is a bullshit company and they're just milking the penny stock for the options:

  • linkedin shows 5 employees - 2 chairman, a director, and the ceo. NO research positions listed. *doesn't mean there aren't more but suspiciously absent*
  • Buckler (CEO) and Rogers (Director) both were/are lawyers. The chairman, Jensen, appears to be in securities law.
  • All three of the above named individuals ALSO have other jobs.
  • Buckler's other job is as CEO of another biotech penny stock called Hemostemix. Let's take a look at how that's done since 2013 when he started as CEO:
  • View attachment 49839

I find the lack of current employees rather suspicious. There are a large number of former employees. I haven't even begun reading over the shoddy financial and corporate documents. OTC financials, it's going to be entertaining I'm sure.

I think they've made a profession of chairing, directing, and otherwise leading failed biotechs that are publicly traded under these loosely regulated exchanges. The options are motivation enough, just bleed investors for a few more years. Being sure to publish data in speculative bull markets that make the past research seem viable enough to propel the stock. Being rather "lawyerly" in the process so as not to commit any sort of fraud. All quite legal.

As sketchy as it is their early results from the initial trial did show hair regrowth in a majority of patients. I'm skeptical of Replicel but at the same time a company worth billions bought the rights for it in Asia and even has set up an entire institute in dealing with the product. These are people with phd's and master degrees who have spent years studying micro biology and the likes. It's not to far off to think that they have a good shot with getting it to work.
 
Top