Sorry if I'm misinterpreting this, but how doesn't this demonstrate that it's not a disease and that you should just shave it off if it increases the risk of prostate cancer threefold? Excuse me if I'm being a blind idiot, because there is certainly that chance.
Replicel Is On Fire Lately — Data In Feb.
- Thread starter That Guy
- Start date
Sorry if I'm misinterpreting this, but how doesn't this demonstrate that it's not a disease and that you should just shave it off if it increases the risk of prostate cancer threefold? Excuse me if I'm being a blind idiot, because there is certainly that chance.
I could be wrong, but is it not that finasteride can actually increase testosterone levels due to less converting to DHT?
- Reaction score
- 25
So according to that pdf there is no difference in the success rate of Propecia, Rogaine and Replicel 
- Reaction score
- 452
So according to that pdf there is no difference in the success rate of Propecia, Rogaine and Replicel
This is good news. If replicel has the same efficacy as finasteride but it is permanent after one administration with no potential side effects, then this is effectively a cure for all low lvl NWs. If this is the case, then this is a HUGE success and advancement.
So according to that pdf there is no difference in the success rate of Propecia, Rogaine and Replicel
It's still not clear... high dose, low dose? high dose with few injections?
Can someone explain it... I thought that they only use low doses in safety trials??
Yes but I cannot imagine that 25 percent increase is the limit...
I think Shiseido uses higher doses in their current phase 2 trial
so it means same dose but more injections...
- Reaction score
- 540
i have tried to find the info where it states they are using same dosage or the lesser one and more injections but in vain.. cudn't find anything.
wud be glad if anybody solves this confusion.
@That Guy @hellouser
Last edited:
I never stated they're using the same f*****g dosage, jesus christ stop making things up and inferring things. Just wait until they report the data in February and then we have some more info on the (long term) effectiveness of the treatment.
- Reaction score
- 2,634
If my memory serves me right, my chat with Dr. Rolf Hoffmann said the dose they used in Phase 1 was too much and they'd be bringing it down. Don't take my word for it, it's been a while.
- Reaction score
- 540
it's not abt the dose buddy.
i just wanted to know what changes they are making in their phase 2 trial ( let it be the dose or the frequency of injections or the period of treatment) because these changes are important and crucial as nobody will be happy with just 14.3% inc. in hair density.
these questions are vital and important as it proves whether they are scam or not.
i hope u know what happened to the brotzu hype, u can't blindly follow anyone.
- Reaction score
- 540
glad u replied
and another question
Did they mention anything about changing the no. of injections in phase 2?
I can't find a .gif that accurately demonstrates my reaction to this post.
constrictedvoid
Established Member
- Reaction score
- 63
A Patrick Stewart facepalm could work.
thomps1523
Established Member
- Reaction score
- 298
Personally I would do this if there is a15% increase in hair density no questions asked. If it also adds immunity to future hair loss that as many have said is a cure for many!
- Reaction score
- 2,634
Don't remember... but pretty sure they didn't mention it.
Desmond_84
Established Member
- Reaction score
- 359
Guys imagine if the 5 year data shows complete maintenance at injection site and no adverse effects. That is insane! Really excited to see the results
Sorry, just asking for clarification. Got it, though. Thanks.