Im not going to speak for the guy but I think he's probably smart enough to eliminate this factor. What you are talking about works for about 5 hours. As soon as you take a shower or do anything, if oil is the only thing holding the hair in place, that hair is going to fall out. This guy is saying after 9 months of use he feels its doing its job. Big difference, and for once its nice to hear someone give a product sufficient time to work before they make an assessment. My guess is he probably has seen no further progression of his hair loss, and that is exactly what I would expect Revivogen to accomplish, if it worked.THFC said:you know revivogen is oily yeh..........so when your hair sheds alot of the shed hair will attach itslf to hair that isnt falling out..so when u put ur hands thru ur hair u will see less fall out...dnt believe me?..try it with normal oil...im not aying revivogen is crap..but the oil certainly helps it look liek less hair is falling out when u put ur hands thru it..anyways well done dude, keep up the good work, heard some success stories with revivogen, but not too many on this forum
GourmetStyleWellness said:Only kept to DHT inhibitors and antiandrogens.
gourmetstylewellness.com
GourmetStyleWellness said:I have been on Revivogen spironolactone Nizoral combo for 3 years and have maintained my entire hairline that was falling out like mad before I went on Propecia for 3 years.
gourmetstylewellness.com
Started losing hair. Went on Propecia 3 months later.Cornholio said:gourmetstylewellness.com... are you saying that you maintained on topicals alone (revivogen, spironolactone, nizoral) or in ADDITION to propecia over the last 3 years?
That's why we categorize Revivogen in the unproven section of the site. Its not a shameful title. If all we did was talk proven treatments, we'd only talk Propecia and Rogaine. However I challenge you to find as much clinical data and studies backing the ingredients in any product in the unproven realm that even comes close to rivaling Revivogen's. Of course its a crap shoot, but in the world of uncertainty, Revivogen dominates the "potentially helpful" category hands down.Looking for studies on Revivogen's ingredients I see a lot of things that fall into the "maybe helpful but not proven"
There is Propecia and Rogaine and then 500,000 other products. Do you only use products that have studies done on humans? Probably a good idea, but for guys who can not tolerate finasteride, spironolactone/Revivogen combo is the way to go. I always quote this article but it still rings true today:ALA, GLA and azelaic acid which have invitro activity but no well proven topical anti-androgen efficacy in people
Agreed, and I dont think anyone made that suggestion in this thread ... definitely not anywhere on the rest of the site. Always use proven treatments before unproven ones. Wouldn't it be nice if people actually followed that advice? ;-)I dont know that I would trust it to take the place of propecia.
Amen brother. There is one specific man I have in mind right now who needs to hear that over and over and over ....Testimonials will never prove anything....
GourmetStyleWellness said:There is Propecia and Rogaine and then 500,000 other products. Do you only use products that have studies done on humans?ALA, GLA and azelaic acid which have invitro activity but no well proven topical anti-androgen efficacy in people
GourmetStyleWellness said:Started losing hair. Went on Propecia 3 months later.
3 years on Propecia and Nizoral - maintained my hair.
3 years on Revivogen, spironolactone Lotion 5%, Nizoral alone - maintained my hair.
Success has two definitions with hair loss. Maintenance and regrowth. Which one is yours? Mine is maintenance. If you want regrowth you need a growth stimulant included. If you want to avoid minoxidil, consider Tricomin.HairlossCA said:So I tried spironolactone (5% at bedtime) instead and maintained the constants (finasteride and nizoral). Still not alot of success.
No Doubt. But there's also a world of difference between the amount of data backing the ingredients in revivogen *IN COMPARISON TO* the millions of ridiculously unbacked snake oils out there that make up the "unproven" world. We aren't disagreeing, we're agreeing.Cornholio said:I think there is a world of difference between invitro and invivo
And if you're going to trust an unproven treatment, it is only logical that you use the one with the most data backing it. Those are Sprio and Revivogen, hands down. I never suggest using either before giving Propecia a good 2 full years to work though.I agree, the "proven" treatments arent always enough... If you need more you have to experiment on yourself a little : )
Cornholio said:I think there is a world of difference between invitro and invivo... test tube models dont account for absorption, among other issues. Since there are balding monkeys in need of treatment and hamster flank organs to be supressed I trust these models more than in vitro, but less than human scalp studies. If any treatment were that effective it would be easy to do such at least a hamster if not a monkey study (if you had confidence it were effective).
Azelaic acid hasn't made that step. spironolactone has some animal studies, and even some human (acne, hirsuitism) testing showing some small effect.
Cornholio said:Fluradil has (as far as I know) only a forearm study of 40 volunteers showing a very small (?significant) difference in anagen phase hairs.