m0rpheus said:Lets get this straight. I always see spironolactone topical topics and everyone gets all excited. I too get excited about the idea.
Who has actually had results in topical spironolactone? Because I am yet to see many/if any threads after hours of research on numerous forums which are singing the praises of topical spironolactone working. I do sometimes read some positive results but usually they have started minoxidil/propecia etc at the same time.
Also i quote from the website linked above.
Spironolactones have been used for hair loss for decades. Early in my career, I had asked well respected dermatologists about their experience with spironolactones and the results for the treatment of hair loss. The consistent story I got from them was that they were not efficacious and patients who used them, with or without other injectable medications used in the head, had no significant demonstrated benefit. With that knowledge, the written material that you’ve sent me seems to fall flat, missing some elements of science in the practical world of clinical medicine.
striker9 said:So if no one appear to have results with photos, etc.
It means spironolactone don't work right?
Petchsky said:striker9 said:So if no one appear to have results with photos, etc.
It means spironolactone don't work right?
No, it either means there is no one on the board that uses spironolactone exclusively/with photos, or that spironolactone gives no regrowth and is maintenance only, which is what I believe, also why there's not loads of people on the net heralding it as a great discovery.
Rework24 said:Why would you not see re-growth if spironolactone was preventing the dht binding to the androgen receptor?
Is it a case that spironolactone is not a powerful enough anti androgen?
striker9 said:So what people really recommend that works has an topical anti-dht without sides?