Simple question....who is the best?

LookingGood!

Experienced Member
Reaction score
0
so what's the news on dutasteride? The suspense is killing me.
 
G

Guest

Guest
i think they were just saying how they're doing a trial in korea which is supposedly phase III but is actually less participants then the phase II trial glaxo already did.
 

hrscare

New Member
Reaction score
0
johnnyseville said:
LookingGood! said:
pete you dont need 100g/cm2 for an ultimate result. Densities at 50 show the illusion of something close to 100. All on the skill of the surgeon. Keep doing the research and see AS MANY IN PERSON AS POSSIBLE! Dont let travel stand in your way of success.


Depending on hair quality, hair/scalp contrast and existing density in surrounding areas, 50 graft/cm2 may not be sufficient. H&W routinely surpass 70 grafts.

Why not check what density you have at the back of your head. Thats what Dr. Arvind tells. If your donor area density is 70, why would you wastye grafts putting them at 100/cm?
 
G

Guest

Guest
hrscare said:
johnnyseville said:
LookingGood! said:
pete you dont need 100g/cm2 for an ultimate result. Densities at 50 show the illusion of something close to 100. All on the skill of the surgeon. Keep doing the research and see AS MANY IN PERSON AS POSSIBLE! Dont let travel stand in your way of success.


Depending on hair quality, hair/scalp contrast and existing density in surrounding areas, 50 graft/cm2 may not be sufficient. H&W routinely surpass 70 grafts.

Why not check what density you have at the back of your head. Thats what Dr. Arvind tells. If your donor area density is 70, why would you wastye grafts putting them at 100/cm?

If donor area density is 70 g/cm2, then you'd probably only need 50 g/cm2 to get rock solid similar density in receipient areas.
 
Top