SM04554 Phase 2 results

Hairloss23

Banned
Reaction score
54
Yeah I'm not gonna lie the results aren't even that bad considering

a) they were on patients who are high norwoods
b) the patients have therefore been bald for a long time in most cases
c) it was only 3 months.
 

buckthorn

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
5,209
Yeah I'm not gonna lie the results aren't even that bad considering

a) they were on patients who are high norwoods
b) the patients have therefore been bald for a long time in most cases
c) it was only 3 months.

:bravo:
 

IvanXproject

Established Member
Reaction score
13
The biggest downside with kerastem in my opinion is that it will leave you with scars on your stomach..
 

hellouser

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
2,634
Yeah I'm not gonna lie the results aren't even that bad considering

a) they were on patients who are high norwoods
b) the patients have therefore been bald for a long time in most cases
c) it was only 3 months.

Yup. The three months timespan is key here. I suppose everyone is expecting immediate regrowth... hair doesn't grow like that, not even when healthy after a shed as it typically last several months at least.
 

Coiffio

New Member
Reaction score
5
Didn't know about the 3 month part. Hopefully 6+ months does it more justice. Also, with all of this 50% more hair on minoxidil talk, I think I should finally give it a try! I'd be the world's thickest NW2 if I'm lucky enough to be one of those mythical elite responders.


There seem to be two camps with expectations for hair loss drugs.

Camp a: who have lost too much hair already and need something to bring it back

Camp b: who still have enough hair (or can use an hair transplant to get the illusion of it) and just need something to keep it.

Both totally different requirements.

So these results: the control group lost hair, but the drug users gained 10% (or 15 if you go from control group).

This is awesome for the b camp people. Even if it could only keep at baseline, that's still perfect.

I feel sorry for my brothers here in camp a, but for us lucky ones in camp b, these kind of results are still exciting for us...

Is there anything to suggest this gives long term maintenance? No one turns NW7 in just 3 months.
 

MrJolly16

Experienced Member
Reaction score
602
What have you said about April? Are they going to continue with the trial or are they going to begin a new one?

I have not lost hope, not yet!

Regards from Spain ;)
 

hellouser

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
2,634

lynney45

Established Member
Reaction score
21
Disappointed - will be following through with Shapiro this summer, i awaited these results before fully comittimg. Staying on cb and seti topically for maintenance then will probably tackle histogen or replicel once they are on the market. No more waiting lads, we make the best of what we have available today. Whats the point of going through tgis misery on a daily basis looking into the future with a crystal ball. End the suffering now with a hair transplant then work with other treatments in the future. Dont let your 20/30's go to waste, these are the days where you are in the prime of your life. Ok we have to compromise our donor density, but really who gives a **** nobody looks at the back of your head anyway, when people talk to you they look at your face.
 

Afro_Vacancy

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
11,939
10% regrowth after three months on high norwoods is good.

Wth that said, why did they handicap themselves with a 3-month trial?
 

nameless

Banned
Reaction score
1,091
10% regrowth after three months on high norwoods is good.

Wth that said, why did they handicap themselves with a 3-month trial?

I don't know. And that has never made sense to me. We KNOW from science that the moment they cease treatment the hair should start falling out again. We know this because they did an experiment where they injected androgens into a castrated man who had a full head of hair that would have already been lost but for the fact that he had been castrated. They know he would have lost his hair if he hadn't been castrated because his identical twin was bald by the time of the experiment. Anyway, after injecting him with androgens his hair started falling out rapidly. He lost it within a few months instead of over years. This experiment shows that the moment a man is taken off a medical treatment for hair loss the androgens will start doing their dirty-work and he will rapidly lose any hair that should have been lost by that point in time.
 

Hairloss23

Banned
Reaction score
54
I don't know. And that has never made sense to me. We KNOW from science that the moment they cease treatment the hair should start falling out again. We know this because they did an experiment where they injected androgens into a castrated man who had a full head of hair that would have already been lost but for the fact that he had been castrated. They know he would have lost his hair if he hadn't been castrated because his identical twin was bald by the time of the experiment. Anyway, after injecting him with androgens his hair started falling out rapidly. He lost it within a few months instead of over years. This experiment shows that the moment a man is taken off a medical treatment for hair loss the androgens will start doing their dirty-work and he will rapidly lose any hair that should have been lost by that point in time.

I don't think that Sammumed are concerned with their patients hair loss getting worse. Ugly desperate bald guys are everywhere, they can get more subjects with a snap of their fingers.
 

nameless

Banned
Reaction score
1,091
I don't think that Sammumed are concerned with their patients hair loss getting worse. Ugly desperate bald guys are everywhere, they can get more subjects with a snap of their fingers.

Of course Samumed doesn't care about the test subject becoming ugly but the point is that when Samumed made their test subjects stop
using SM04554 after just 3 months the patient's (hair-growth) progress halted at that point and the patients actually started losing any gains they had already made.
The patients may have even had more hair at 3 months (the last day they used SM04554) than they did at 6 months, which was 3 months after they stopped using SM04554.
And they did their final hair counts at or after the 6-month mark. Applying the drug for 3-months has always looked like an obvious mistake to me.
 

paleocapa89

Established Member
Reaction score
148
What puzzles me though is how can the test subjects have 100 hair/cm2 on average if they are high norwood patients. Sh*t, I don't even have that density even though I am not high norwood.
 

Afro_Vacancy

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
11,939
What puzzles me though is how can the test subjects have 100 hair/cm2 on average if they are high norwood patients. Sh*t, I don't even have that density even though I am not high norwood.

They probably went to a section of the head with high hair density ...
 
Top