The Case in Favor of Dr. Proctors Proxiphen

israelite

Experienced Member
Reaction score
15
I been using proxiphen for a very long and have gained a tremendous amount hairs along the hairline. in fact i gained over a Norwood!

what makes proxiphen so good? its the unique, patented multi-ingredient hair formulas that address all the known factors in the balding process, in fact there are 16 active ingredients which include SOD-mimetic spin-labels TEMPO and TEMPOL. here is clinical studies showing the results of JUST one of the active ingredients http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9166544

Both the Upjohn Corporation and Unilever have had major European hair loss patents rejected because Dr. Proctor made the discoveries first.

here my results with capillogain, good ru and proxiphen

getting strong regrowth! proof is in the youtub e video


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xo5PgaFAVCA

here is the old youtube videos

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uWCGKUkWDRA
 

Jacob

Senior Member
Reaction score
44
There is no evidence for what Israelite is saying there, including the norwood change....but I'd love to get a response to this: "Both the Upjohn Corporation and Unilever have had major European hair loss patents rejected because Dr. Proctor made the discoveries first." Source? What were they?

Then the only "study" mentioned...is on "radiation-induced alopecia". And that's it? All those other actives and 20+ years?

The case against Proctor and his products(including the myth about all those active ingredients- they are not all listed, so the others do not exist): http://www.gourmetstylewellness.com/interact/showthread.php/66436-Dr-Proctor-Wikipedia-Found-Falsehood

http://www.gourmetstylewellness.com/interac...-Dr-Proctor-Snake-oil-n-since-(at-least)-1987
 

DoctorHouse

Senior Member
Reaction score
5,735
Jacob, I miss the Cat and Mouse chase with you and Bryan. Bryan please come back and respond to this thread. Or just come back and let us know how you are doing.
 

israelite

Experienced Member
Reaction score
15
There is no evidence for what Israelite is saying there, including the norwood change....but I'd love to get a response to this: "Both the Upjohn Corporation and Unilever have had major European hair loss patents rejected because Dr. Proctor made the discoveries first." Source? What were they?

Then the only "study" mentioned...is on "radiation-induced alopecia". And that's it? All those other actives and 20+ years?

The case against Proctor and his products(including the myth about all those active ingredients- they are not all listed, so the others do not exist): http://www.gourmetstylewellness.com/interact/showthread.php/66436-Dr-Proctor-Wikipedia-Found-Falsehood

http://www.gourmetstylewellness.com/interac...-Dr-Proctor-Snake-oil-n-since-(at-least)-1987
hi jacob , do u sill use skin revolution shampoo? its verry good!!!!!!!!!! anyways most people who have used proxiphen have gained big time! jacob here is my phtos BEFORE ANY TREATMENT

- - - Updated - - -
 

Attachments

  • hairline 5 years ago 2.jpg
    hairline 5 years ago 2.jpg
    90 KB · Views: 739
  • hairine 4 years ago.jpg
    hairine 4 years ago.jpg
    93 KB · Views: 728

Jacob

Senior Member
Reaction score
44
Jacob, I miss the Cat and Mouse chase with you and Bryan. Bryan please come back and respond to this thread. Or just come back and let us know how you are doing.

Well maybe Mark can take his place. There isn't much difference when it comes to refuting things/backing things up anyway :crazy:
 

israelite

Experienced Member
Reaction score
15
Well maybe Mark can take his place. There isn't much difference when it comes to refuting things/backing things up anyway :crazy:

lol u are funny jacob. anyways here the progress phtos
 

Attachments

  • hairline may30.jpg
    hairline may30.jpg
    98.6 KB · Views: 878

Jacob

Senior Member
Reaction score
44
hi jacob , do u sill use skin revolution shampoo? its verry good!!!!!!!!!! anyways most people who have used proxiphen have gained big time! jacob here is my phtos BEFORE ANY TREATMENT

- - - Updated - - -

here my progress phtots jacob

Again..instead of answering my questions..responding to what I(or anyone else says)..you ask about something unrelated and then make some fairy-tale claim about Prox working for most- gained big time even. Those before pictures are at quite a distance. Not that it'll change anything..but how about taking some now at the same distance?
 

israelite

Experienced Member
Reaction score
15
here is another phto showing progress.


the one photo shows proxiphen results with the arrow
 

Attachments

  • hairline today 1.jpg
    hairline today 1.jpg
    19.2 KB · Views: 943
  • images11111111111111 prox results.jpg
    images11111111111111 prox results.jpg
    2.3 KB · Views: 883

Jacob

Senior Member
Reaction score
44
There is no evidence for what Israelite is saying there, including the norwood change....but I'd love to get a response to this: "Both the Upjohn Corporation and Unilever have had major European hair loss patents rejected because Dr. Proctor made the discoveries first." Source? What were they?

Then the only "study" mentioned...is on "radiation-induced alopecia". And that's it? All those other actives and 20+ years?

The case against Proctor and his products(including the myth about all those active ingredients- they are not all listed, so the others do not exist): http://www.gourmetstylewellness.com/interact/showthread.php/66436-Dr-Proctor-Wikipedia-Found-Falsehood

http://www.gourmetstylewellness.com/interact/showthread.php/59371-Dr-Proctor-Snake-oil-n-since-%28at-least%29-1987

Tricomin(which actually does have some studies behind it) is great for the hairline! Many guys use it and they all see great results!

(sarcasm alert for anyone reading that and taking it seriously...)
 

israelite

Experienced Member
Reaction score
15
Tricomin(which actually does have some studies behind it) is great for the hairline! Many guys use it and they all see great results!

(sarcasm alert for anyone reading that and taking it seriously...)

jacob prox n and tricomin are for scalp health where as pres proxiphen is for hairline ONLY
 

Jacob

Senior Member
Reaction score
44
There is no evidence for what Israelite is saying there, including the norwood change....but I'd love to get a response to this: "Both the Upjohn Corporation and Unilever have had major European hair loss patents rejected because Dr. Proctor made the discoveries first." Source? What were they?

Then the only "study" mentioned...is on "radiation-induced alopecia". And that's it? All those other actives and 20+ years?

The case against Proctor and his products(including the myth about all those active ingredients- they are not all listed, so the others do not exist): http://www.gourmetstylewellness.com/interact/showthread.php/66436-Dr-Proctor-Wikipedia-Found-Falsehood

http://www.gourmetstylewellness.com/interac...-Dr-Proctor-Snake-oil-n-since-(at-least)-1987

Where does it say Proxiphen is for the hairline only? Who told you Tricomin or anything else doesn't do great just on the hairline, if used there?
 

ohmanohno

Established Member
Reaction score
628
Lol this is pure gold. Israelite is using the kitchen sink approach to battle hairloss so how about you just drop everything and stick to prox-n with before and after pics bro. Come see us in a few months.
 

israelite

Experienced Member
Reaction score
15
Lol this is pure gold. Israelite is using the kitchen sink approach to battle hairloss so how about you just drop everything and stick to prox-n with before and after pics bro. Come see us in a few months.

hi ohmanohno i cant do that. proxiphen is one small peice of puzzle. i like using hairline serums from elsom, capillogain, etc
 

DoctorHouse

Senior Member
Reaction score
5,735
Israelite, no offense but your hairline is just full of see through whispy hairs. Its not a solid looking hairline. Only a dense hair transplant is going to give you what you really want. I have been where you have in spending hundreds of dollars on the kitchen sink. I have tried everything including Proxiphen and it never saved my hairline. I do see new growth in my hairline but its not going to look cosmetically significant. Face the facts that the hair line is impossible to save. If it were so possible, hair transplants for the hairline would be declining rapidly. Propecia is all you need and one minoxidil like agent like minoxidil or Capillogain or if you insist Proxiphen.
 

israelite

Experienced Member
Reaction score
15
Israelite, no offense but your hairline is just full of see through whispy hairs. Its not a solid looking hairline. Only a dense hair transplant is going to give you what you really want. I have been where you have in spending hundreds of dollars on the kitchen sink. I have tried everything including Proxiphen and it never saved my hairline. I do see new growth in my hairline but its not going to look cosmetically significant. Face the facts that the hair line is impossible to save. If it were so possible, hair transplants for the hairline would be declining rapidly. Propecia is all you need and one minoxidil like agent like minoxidil or Capillogain or if you insist Proxiphen.
its not great but i will take a Norwood 1.6 over a Norwood 2.5 anyday.
 

israelite

Experienced Member
Reaction score
15
Mark.. anyone who knows you would tell you don't do it.. you look like a normal guy now.. hairloss is mainly visible to you with your close up camera.. you may not want to end up with rows of deforested trees for hairline..... I'd stick it out till your CB arrives..you've seen the pics..
science im not sure what u mean

- - - Updated - - -

I guess I'll repost my questions tomorrow? :doh:
dont be foolish jacob post it now! speak your peace
 
Top