The real cause of male pattern baldness - Discovered and explained

[Feramon1]

I just learned that this theory was debunked and called a scam a century ago.

Seems like we have come full circle to ignorance about hairloss with scam artists pushing this bludflow theory again

This may only make sense from the point of view of the bite, and more specifically the temporal artery, which can be occluded. In my memory of celebrities, Tom Cruise changed his bite, but he had no recession before that, with a bad jaw.

The author, apparently, is trying to raise his self-esteem and convince himself that he will never go bald, but this, unfortunately or fortunately, does not work. Otherwise, I can't explain why a non-balding person should come to this forum and prove to the balding people that they are freaks lol.

 

[Feramon1]

At first glance, it seems that it recedes in the temples, but this is only a visual effect, which is exactly due to the galea. In both cases, he does not go bald. Author, you can look for similar cases, if you show at least 1 where a bald guy changed his jaw, became a norwood 1 without any drugs and transplants, we will all carry you in our arms. In the meantime, the topic has value only from the point of view of the activity of users who refute it, introducing something new and are likely to find some clues.

 

[skeletor]

Can you explain smooth vs rigid galea to me?

 

[Mitko1]

Can you explain smooth vs rigid galea to me?

I will on PM

 

[Renovation]

Regardless whether this galea shape/jawline shape is related to balding (I'm still not sold) the fact that male pattern baldness and most diffuse balding follows exactly the same pattern as scalp tension on top of galea is biggest clue to why we start to go bald.

It's been calculated at 1/10000 chance for this pattern match to be coincidental.

It also fits the DHT theory and why meds work to slow down hairloss.

 

[Mitko1]

@Ritchie After finding this profile on flickr I am 100% convinced to believe this theory and that what the guy from TMD occlusion is saying is true.
This is a profile with photos of more than 500 men getting hairpieces and no one of them has a good craniofacial development. They have all kind of odd face shapes. Just look @Ritchie

Those are not cherry picked. These are the first 10 men that don't make any facial expressions so you can clearly see their facial structure.

You can go to the profile

Phil Osmond

Explore Phil Osmond’s 7,110 photos on Flickr!

www.flickr.com

As you can see none of these men have horizontal faces like these:

Аlso no one of the guys presented above has a good galea, neither one of the others at the profile. Their galeas either look like an egg or like a huge mound. If I find another channel or account where non balding men are getting haircut and shaving their head I am sure that the difference would be huge. I will post If i find.

 

[Hairful]

Debunked a century ago lol

 

[Feramon1]

Very interesting, how long will you deny the obvious?

Full head (poor galea and craniofacial development):

 

[norwood_spotter]

ideal galea, the tumor release tension from the galea

just get a tumor bro

 

[Moz5x]

Tumormaxxing is the solution

 

[Mitko1]

Very interesting, how long will you deny the obvious?

Full head (poor galea and craniofacial development):

View attachment 181685View attachment 181686View attachment 181687View attachment 181688View attachment 181689View attachment 181690View attachment 181691View attachment 181692View attachment 181693View attachment 181694View attachment 181695View attachment 181696View attachment 181697View attachment 181698

I have said that according to this theory people with poor craniofacial development can still have their hair. But people with good craniofacial development can't be balding. Also not everyone of these people fits the criteria of poor craniofacial development. Some of these guys have decent face shapes.

 

[Mr. Slap Head]

Real cause is fapping

 

[Hairful]

Scam continues

 

[Mitko1]

@Ritchie No matter what I post people will never admit that they belive but I found a profile on instragram about men cutting their hair and there are pics of non balding taken from the same angle. Here are the first ten that don't make any facial expression. To me it's quite clear that their face shapes doesn't look the same as the face shapes of balding men.

 

[Feramon1]

@Ritchie No matter what I post people will never admit that they belive but I found a profile on instragram about men cutting their hair and there are pics of non balding taken from the same angle. Here are the first ten that don't make any facial expression. To me it's quite clear that their face shapes doesn't look the same as the face shapes of balding men.



View attachment 181900

View attachment 181901

View attachment 181902

View attachment 181903

View attachment 181904

View attachment 181905

View attachment 181906

In the 2nd photo the guy is going bald. Also doubts about the 5th and 7th photos, it is likely that they also began to retreat. Keep in mind that the shadows are darkened in the photo, this creates the impression of density.

 

[Hairful]

Debunked a century ago

 

[Renovation]

Involvement of Mechanical Stress in Androgenetic Alopecia - PMC

Androgenetic alopecia (Androgenetic Alopecia) is a frequent disorder characterized by progressive hair miniaturization in a very similar pattern among all affected men. The pathogenesis is related to androgen-inducible overexpression of transforming growth factor β-1 ...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Worth a read.

There's also other studies suggesting elastic deformation of the galea is a major factor in male pattern baldness, alongside the well known hormonal factors.

Definitely something worth looking into, even if your using the big 3 and are hell bent on believing it's entirely the fault of DHT.

 

[Hairful]

Bluudflow theory

 

[Renovation]

Debunked a century ago

Do you base all your medical theory's on century old studies or just hair related stuff?

We still built fighter aircraft from wood 100 years ago.

 

[Hairful]

Do you base all your medical theory's on century old studies or just hair related stuff?

We still built fighter aircraft from wood 100 years ago.

The point is this blood flow theory and similar were prevalent even century ago with snake oil salesmen preying in poor hairloss sufferers until science eventually came and debunked them all in the beginning of the start of modern medicine a century ago.

Our knowledge of hairloss has advanced so much yet these snake oil salesmen still use the same old BS theories. This guy literally said a few posts ago Botox relaxes galea and causes hair growth when in reality Botox does this by inhibiting some necrosis/apoptosis factors and not by relaxing muscles lmao. He still wants people to use smooth brained thinking like he does.

It’s 2022, we know AA is caused through a multi factoral hormonal and other pathways such as DHT, prolactin, (some necrosis factors I can’t recall names exactly), wnt pathways etc.

It is honestly offensive this guy comes and says BLUUUUDFLOW theory wishing to send us back to the pre-finasteride dark ages of hairloss. F*ck his debunked theories.

They literally cut the vein in head in some people where it gets too big/bulging and yet this smooth brained theory of low blood flow doesn’t work and there’s no hairloss.

So yeah, debunked a century ago. Sell this sh*t elsewhere