- Reaction score
- 11,939
I think the reason so many people fail with traditional diets, i.e. trying to eat a bunch of small, healthy meals, is because they essentially are trying to give up one of life's great pleasures, a good meal.
They might have their cheat day once a week or whatever, but is that really going to be enough to tide them over? Like, "well, I'm not going to eat that, but at least 5 days from now I can enjoy eating what I want." That's a difficult thing to stick to. With the one meal a day thing I do, it's much easier for me to resist cravings throughout the day, as I know I will enjoy the satisfaction of a good meal that very night.
I get to stay lean without giving up one of the things that makes daily life bearable.
Yes, I agree, that's the strength of intermittent fasting: you can look forward to glorious meals. I think the two meals I had today are pretty nice though?
Jason Fung, a nephrologist in Toronto, points out the same thing. A diet that says you can't have cake on your birthday is a bad diet.
Moreover in the real world "dinner" has social significance. People go out for dinner. You should go out too.
Martin Berkhan is a legendary advocate of intermittent fasting who pushed for it in the early 2000s, back when the standard advice was six tiny meals a day. He is incredibly fit. And he brags that fasting allows him to eat ... if you look him up on google images, there's a lot of images of him eating junk:
