Women Call Me Bald On A Dating Site Pof

[Derelict]

View attachment 141978 View attachment 141979

Calling people incel or not doesn't change the fact there's something very wrong with society. Look at the facts.

Do you not think a lot of that has to do with choice though? i would never have sex with someone unless i was in a relationship with them, one night stands etc are just not for me, maybe the problems lies in men forming relationships rather that women being the culprit behind the stats you showed.

 

[disfiguredyoungman]

Here are a few of the recent examples of women calling me bald to insult me on the popular dating site Plentyoffish. I always send a nice friendly introduction message to every woman on that site... 99% blatantly ignore me, however, will sometimes send a follow up if I see they've seen my profile.

Apart from one conversation it is you who sounds like the bitter and agressive one, what do you expect?

 

[Goodsend]

If in 2020 you still use online dating app you're extremely low IQ

Girls are there only for validation or to have a ONS with literally the top 1% of guys. They don't care about anything else. f*****g low IQ guys making Tinder's, POF's and Bumble's creators rich with their delusion.

If you are average looking you need to find a girl outside, through your job or circle of friends....and forget ONS unless you are in for scraps.

 

[tomJ]

Well, they aren't wrong. I'm kinda surprised you're having such bad luck though. You don't look ugly, and those are not attractive women. They should be happy anyone wants them.

Agree!

 

[alexfighter1111]

p**rn is a factor but it's been widely available for the western world since the late 90's. There's much more at play than just p**rn.

But why aren't women also having less sex than men? There's a big difference between the genders.

View attachment 141980

Internet p**rn is completely different. Previously, a man had for example 10 video cassettes and a couple of magazines. Now a guy of 20 years can go to the site and see thousands of attractive girls. Unlimited novelty. He can even change videos every second and maintain a very high dose of dopamine in the brain. These are completely different things. Guys just don't have the motivation to find girls. Why do they need girls if they have a computer and an unlimited number of videos. They are weak, insecure and without any motivation. Many guys have impotence

 

[alexfighter1111]

But internet p**rn is available in free and unlimited amounts since the late 90's yet the numbers have been normal until 2008. So p**rn is not the cause although a clear factor.

It became widespread in 2006. It was then when YouTube appeared.

What changed in men’s sexual environment during this time? Well, major changes were internet penetration and access to p**rn videos (followed by access to streaming p**rn in 2006, and then smartphones on which to view it. “I discovered tube sites in 2006. I remember it, VIVIDLY. It was like….p**rn on steroids, big time. I mean it was WAY hotter than seeking out little 15 second clips, waiting for them to download, then proceeding.” “It was only a few years ago that I discovered tube sites, and I think those are the worst for warping your brain.“The tube sites screwed up everything. They changed the history of p**rn.”

In mid-2006, the world of p**rn underwent a transformation. Before this momentous event, you had to download the video, then open it, and risk getting a virus. Sometimes you didn’t have the right software, so you spent a lot of time making sure it was what you wanted to see before downloading it and ‘enjoying’ it, or you would go to a specific site whose content you liked, watch the one or two new videos and leave it at that.

More recently, p**rn delivery evolved in the direction of video gallery sites (increasingly referred to as ‘tube sites’) which aggregate pages of thumbnails of streaming tube videos from different p**rn sites. No guesswork, no pause while downloading. You look across a matrix of thumbnails of videos with maybe 100 or so screenshots, see a picture that floats your boat and click on it.

However, p**rn purveyors want hits, so your click may take you to that video, or it may take you to another site that you didn’t intend to visit, often another gallery site, which is giving the first site a referral kick-back. Now you’ve got two pages of thumbnails open. At first, you find that annoying and close one, but after things deteriorate, something on the new page catches your eye and you click on that, making a mental note to go back to the first thumbnail. ….and so on until you find yourself with 20 tabs open.

 

[alexfighter1111]

Historical ED rates
What about other historical rates of ED in peer-reviewed literature using various instruments? First, here are results from the 2 major cross-sectional studies on ED in sexually active American men. Both predated heavy internet penetration.

1. In the 1940s, the Kinsey report concluded that the prevalence of ED was less than 1% in men younger than 30 years, less than 3% in those 30–45.
2. A 1999 cross-sectional study (based on data gathered in 1992) published by the Journal of the American Medical Association reported erectile dysfunction rates of only 5%, and low sexual desire in 5%. In that study, the ages of the men surveyed ranged from 18 to 59, so a third of them were over 40, which means the rates for sexually active men under 40 were lower.

In 2002 Dutch researchers did a meta-analysis of 6 high-quality ED studies. All of the studies reviewed from Europe (5) reported ED rates for men under 40 of approximately 2%. The sixth was the one reported immediately above.

Note: Keep in mind that ED rates for all men in every age group are higher than rates for sexually active men. For example, in the 1992 data for sexually active men 18-59, the average ED rate was only 5%. However, the rates for men (both sexually active and not) were 7% in men 18-29, 9% in men 30-39, 11% in men 40-49, and 18% in men 50-59. In order to compare “apples to apples,” we, like most researchers, focus on rates for sexually active men. This unfortunately fails to count ED problems in young men who avoid sex due to p**rn-induced sexual dysfunctions.

Before we turn back to recent studies, it’s important to understand a bit more about the pathology of erectile dysfunction. ED is usually classified as either psychogenic or organic. Traditionally, psychogenic ED is associated with psychological factors (e.g., depression, stress, or anxiety) while organic ED is attributed to physical conditions (e.g., neurological, hormonal, or anatomical.) The most common diagnosis for guys under 40 is psychogenic ED.

Studies investigating ED risk factors in men under 40 typically fail to find the causes commonly associated with ED in older men, such as smoking, alcoholism, obesity, sedentary life, diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and hyperlipidemia. Be very skeptical if you read that the preceding causes of organic ED in older men are also the cause of a sharp rise in youthful ED. It takes years for various lifestyle factors to manifest as vasculogenic or neurogenic ED. Indeed, a 2018 paper that looked at ED risk factors in young men found no differences in the usual ED risk factors between those with ED and those with no problems (average age 32). The only difference was that those with ED had low sexual desire. The researchers didn’t ask about p**rn use.

Recent studies on young men
Now, we turn to other recent studies on young men (~40 and under). Using the IIEF-5, a 2012 cross-sectional study of Swiss men aged 18-24 found ED rates of 30%, and a 2010 Brazilian study of men 18-40 reported ED rates of 35%. A 2013 Italian study reported one in four patients seeking help for new onset ED were younger than 40. Astonishingly, the rate of severe ED was nearly 10% higher in younger men than in men over 40. The University of Florence urology clinic reported that first time ED patients under 40 comprised about 5% of the total patient population. By 2014-2015 men under 40 seeking help for ED comprised 15% of first time patients. Also, a 2015 paper about 4,211 Italians who sought outpatient help for sexual dysfunction found that compulsive masturbators were younger than the other men and had higher rates of ED (and were likely masturbating to internet p**rn).

A 2014 study of new diagnoses of ED in active duty servicemen reported that rates had more than doubled between 2004 and 2013. Rates of psychogenic ED increased more than organic ED, and rates of unclassified ED remained relatively stable. A 2014 cross-sectional study of active duty, relatively healthy, male military personnel aged 21-40 found an overall ED rate of 33.2%, using the IIEF-5. About half of them also had PTSD (a known risk factor for ED). In a further military study published in 2015, the researchers found that ED was associated with sexual anxiety and genital self-image, both of which could easily be tied to heavy internet p**rn use.

Erectile dysfunction has implications for safe condom use. A 2015 study on problematic condom use, which sampled 479 men (mean age 20.43), reported unexplained erection difficulties during condom use in a total of 62% of the young men:13.8% during condom application, 15.7% during penetrative sex, and 32.2% during both. (This was not a cross-sectional study; researchers noted that they over-sampled those with problems.)

The next studies reveal that abnormally low sexual desire is also cropping up in young men.

• A 2014 study on Canadian adolescents reported that 53.5% of males aged 16-21 have symptoms indicative of a sexual problem. Erectile dysfunction was the most common (27%), followed by low sexual desire (24%), and problems with orgasm (11%). The authors were baffled why rates were so high, and were surprised that sexual dysfunction rates for males surpassed females, unlike in earlier published literature.
• The same Canadian researchers published a 2-year longitudinal study in 2016, in which they found that, over several checkpoints during the 2 years, the following percentages of 16-21 year old males reported:
  1. low sexual satisfaction (47.9%)
  2. low desire (46.2%)
  3. problems in erectile function (45.3%)

While females’ sexual problems improved over time the males’ sexual problems did not: “Unlike for male adolescents, we found a clearer picture of improvement over time for female adolescents, suggesting that learning and experience played a role in improving their sexual lives.” And, “The only factor that emerged as a strong predictor was relationship status: Adolescents who were not in a sexual relationship were approximately three times more likely to report a problem in sexual functioning compared to those who were in a sexual relationship.” [All subjects were sexually active, but who would be using the most p**rn?]

• A 2015 study on Italian high school seniors (18-19) found that 16% of those who use p**rn more than once per week reported abnormally low sexual desire. Non-p**rn users reported 0% low sexual desire.
• A 2014 survey of Croatian men under 40 and under reported ED rates of 31% and low sexual desire rates of 37%.

A 2015 study, which asked Canadian men using p**rn 7 or more hours per week about their sexual functioning, found that 71% had sexual dysfunctions, with 33% reporting difficulty orgasming. Average age 41.5.

This 2018 article about UK a study reported that one in two men in their 30s struggle getting and maintaining an erection!

Together, these studies suggest a recent increase in ED in men ~40 and under, as well as startling rates of anorgasmia and low sexual desire, starting quite young (as does internet p**rn use).

None of these studies had young men remove p**rn use to investigate internet p**rn’s effects on their sexual performance, despite the fact that its use represents a drastic change in men’s sexual environment in the digital age. However, the peer-reviewed evidence supporting internet p**rn as the culprit in youthful sexual dysfunction continues to accumulate. See this list of 37 studies linking p**rn use or p**rn addiction to sexual dysfunctions and lower arousal to sexual stimuli. The first 7 studies in this list demonstrate causation as participants eliminated p**rn use and healed chronic sexual dysfunctions.

 

[baba_yaga]

Strong thread OP and you're a chad, you'd do well in real life I think.

But you're right it's over for the west.

had a good laugh lol

 

[BigOl'BaldingHead]

If in 2020 you still use online dating app you're extremely low IQ

Girls are there only for validation or to have a ONS with literally the top 1% of guys. They don't care about anything else. f*****g low IQ guys making Tinder's, POF's and Bumble's creators rich with their delusion.

If you are average looking you need to find a girl outside, through your job or circle of friends....and forget ONS unless you are in for scraps.

I think you're exaggerating quite a bit, it really depends on what kind of girl you're looking for. I was quite successful on tinder when I used it for 2 months. I even got a (now ex) girlfriend out of it, a friend of mine did as well.

All the girls I've spoken to on tinder weren't really the type of girls that like ONS, they were mainly looking for something serious. But I've only spoken to 18-20 year old girls, older women might be different.

 

[Norwoodcel]

Oh Jesus.. Just to reiterate.. normally I do not send nasty messages, I sent a nice friendly message to everybody, however, once they've ignored me then i have nothing to lose so I go into data-collection mode and try and provoke a reply. The screenshots shown do not represent a typical online dating encounter for me.

I have tried for about 2 years now to find a British girlfriend and it's pretty much impossible. I know I am not bad looking, I have a nice face and i was a slayer in my 20s When this pandemic crap is over I'll be back off to Asia to live life like a real desired man for a month.

I think this is a redpill incel forum full of people in the very early stages of bald cope, many of you will move on in due time when you've realised it's over

 

[TomRiddle]

Oh Jesus.. Just to reiterate.. normally I do not send nasty messages, I sent a nice friendly message to everybody, however, once they've ignored me then i have nothing to lose so I go into data-collection mode and try and provoke a reply. The screenshots shown do not represent a typical online dating encounter for me.

I have tried for about 2 years now to find a British girlfriend and it's pretty much impossible. I know I am not bad looking, I have a nice face and i was a slayer in my 20s When this pandemic crap is over I'll be back off to Asia to live life like a real desired man for a month.

I think this is a redpill incel forum full of people in the very early stages of bald cope, many of you will move on in due time when you've realised it's over

Lmao, the mental gymnastics in this one is strong, time to add another one to the ignore list.

 

[disfiguredyoungman]

You think you're undesirable because you're bald, so you're going to go to Asia where nobody is bald because you'll be more desirable there. What kind of twisted logic is that?

Makes perfect sense to me. A white man is more sought after there so that he can compensate for his baldness.

Your personality is the reason you can't get a woman.

Personality really doesn't matter much if someone is attracted to you either way.

 

[whatintheworld]

OP you may want to try America, if you can speak somewhat eloquently a foreign accent is definitely a plus here amongst women.

 

[Matt3535]

OP you may want to try America, if you can speak somewhat eloquently a foreign accent is definitely a plus here amongst women.

I can attest to this. Had great pussy with even my minor accent.

 

[karatekid]

You think you're undesirable because you're bald, so you're going to go to Asia where nobody is bald because you'll be more desirable there. What kind of twisted logic is that? The fact that you send these messages at all is disturbing. If you message somebody on a dating site and they ignore you because they aren't interested just leave it alone. Your personality is the reason you can't get a woman.

Exactly.
Sorry OP nobody owe you anything , if a girl doesnt reply to you and you start massaging this sh*t it shows you are desperate as f*ck. This is just pathetic. You complain about online dating but you are exactly part of the problem - you ARE one of those desperate horny guys that will do anything to some female attention. If you had some self respect you would just move on when someone ignore your message.

Personality really doesn't matter much if someone is attracted to you either way.

While I dont like those general pointless statements, of course there is some truth in this that your looks let you act in certain ways. If the girl already attracted to you than maybe she will interpret your sayings as flirting, while a girl that isnt attracted will see it as creepy. Those are facts, and you need to accept it and behave according to it. But that's the point, attraction can be build, even if you are not super attractive, you can be charming or impressive enough with your acts that will make the girl develop attraction. But c'mon, insulting a girl's look, while you are yourself bald, is just stupid.

 

[Norwoodcel]

OP you may want to try America, if you can speak somewhat eloquently a foreign accent is definitely a plus here amongst women.

I went to NYC last year for a holiday. I got no matches on tinder

 

[Haironnu]

You think you're undesirable because you're bald, so you're going to go to Asia where nobody is bald because you'll be more desirable there. What kind of twisted logic is that? The fact that you send these messages at all is disturbing. If you message somebody on a dating site and they ignore you because they aren't interested just leave it alone. Your personality is the reason you can't get a woman.

well he's not wrong about one thing, this forum IS full of people who are barely even balding. I can count the users on this forum section that are ACTUALLY in advance stages of balding on 1 hand

 

[Haironnu]

Strong thread OP and you're a chad, you'd do well in real life I think.

But you're right it's over for the west.

tbh idk why you're so invested in this thing, I assume you're not ugly? you're not even Norwood 2 so you're practically a full head, why do you bother with posting videos and studies about this thing, just wondering.

 

[Norwoodcel]

I think the soylent drinking neckbeard cucks are bringing the averages down tbh. These kind of people are a relatively new phenomena

 

[INT]

I think the soylent drinking neckbeard cucks are bringing the averages down tbh. These kind of people are a relatively new phenomena

I think the defeatist incels like yourself play a bigger role. What catchphrases does your incel vocabulary manuscript tell you to throw at me now?