Dave001 said:
Old Baldy said:
Genhair uses 0.025 percent as did the researchers in the following study:
Endocr Pract. 2001 Jan-Feb;7(1):5-10.
"Finasteride cream in hirsutism"
Lucas KJ.
OBJECTIVE: To determine, in a preliminary study, whether women with hirsutism attributable to various causes would benefit from treatment with finasteride cream. METHODS: Finasteride cream (0.25%)
OB, you're getting creative with the decimal places again.
No, but dumba** Old Baldy NEEDS to read studies he posts
MORE CLOSELY.
Here's another "hit" on that study where the abstract states:
Int Dermatol 2001 Jan 40(1): 72-6
Finasteride cream in hirsutism
Finasteride partially block the enzyme 5 aplha reductase which converts testerosterone to dehydrostosterone. Finasteride cream 0.25% and placebo cream were administered to the opposite side of the face of facial hirsutism attributable to various courses. After 6 months period, mean hair counts, decreased significantly from 27.5 to 15.5 (P < 0.05) in the finasteride treated urea but showed no significant change from baseline in the placebo applied sites. Moreover, the mean thickness of the measured hairs was significantly less in finasteride treated side compared with placebo. (3.11 versus 4.33) respectively; P< 0.001). The authors concluded that finasteride cream significantly decreased hair growth and thickness in women with facial hirsutism and no adverse effects were noted.
Dave, I'm going to repost your second study here to get this into my THICK skull once and for all. (Dave, I pay much closer attention when I'm weighing my stuff for homemade concoctions. :lol: )
Here is Dave's posted "abstract" of the second study:
Price, T. M., S. Allen, et al. (2000). "Lack of effect of topical finasteride suggests an endocrine role for dihydrotestosterone." Fertility and Sterility 74(2): 414.
"Finasteride is structurally similar to testosterone and DHT and is freely soluble in chloroform and alcohol. The potential for percutaneous absorption of finasteride exists on the basis of its steroid structure (2), resulting in a Food and Drug Administration warning that pregnant women should not even handle broken tablets. Our study suggests that topical application of finasteride does not result in significant systemic absorption. Despite daily application of 2.5–5 mg of topical finasteride, there was no increase in circulating testosterone or decrease in DHT levels over 6 months. This observation would have been strengthened by the ability to verify finasteride levels in the solution or in the circulation." (emphasis mine)
Now let's assume we use Clau's original 45mg/60ml mix over a 30 day period. That would equate to 1.5mg per day.
Most likely, the 60ml cream would last more like 60 days and that would give us 0.75mg per day.
In your posted study Dave, either scenario would seem to be safe?
Using finasteride. at 0.025 percent we would have, if my math is correct :hairy:, 15mg of finasteride. in the 60ml mix. This would equate to 0.5mg per application assuming a 30 day scenario (or 0.25mg per application assuming a 60 day scenario).
In a nutshell, I think all of you can see that I'm back to "square one" relative to the percentage of finasteride. I should use.
So Dave, why are you and Genhair going with 0.025 percent. I'm obviously confused right now? (I understand Dave that your study didn't give the strength of the solution but the mg.'s of finasteride. applied were 2.5-5mg daily.)
If there's a probable chance that systemic asorption is minimal, why go with 0.025 percent? The studies showing results seem to use more. Or is it that 0.5mg per day, for example, should give results much like it does internally?
At the same time though, if topical finasteride. isn't getting absorbed much internally, I assume(?) we need to strengthen the dosage to make sure adequate amounts at least reach the DP part of the follicle?