Baldness cure could be here in five years say experts

Deadman1

Established Member
Reaction score
40
Ofcourse i do. With the speed of technological improvements nowadays it is only a matter of time medical development will catch up and we are going to benefit from it. Lets stay positive.

Don't be a fool. Billions of dollars have been thrown at breast cancer research alone and we are still no closer to a cure than we were 50 years ago.

Medical research these days is a scam to get grant and donated money to keep people employed. Nothing more and nothing less.

- - - Updated - - -

Rule #1 when waiting for a baldness cure:

It will always be 5 years away.

Rule #2, when a cure seems near, refer to Rule #1.
 

Justinian

New Member
Reaction score
4
Don't be a fool. Billions of dollars have been thrown at breast cancer research alone and we are still no closer to a cure than we were 50 years ago.

Medical research these days is a scam to get grant and donated money to keep people employed. Nothing more and nothing less.

http://www.cancervic.org.au/images/media_release_images/cancer-survival-stats-2005.gif

That's just the past 10 years.

http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/pro.../@sta/documents/image/surv_5yr_breast_png.png

People with your mentality really baffle me. You're saying there's no monetary incentive for corporations and people to have a cure? With patents, if somebody found a full-blown cure they would be insanely rich. There would have to be collusion between every single researcher in order for your idea to work, which just isn't feasible. Many researchers get into the field after seeing loved ones pass to the disease. The may have a dying family member or friend at the time of their research, and you think they will just not tell them about the cure that they know?
 

jksl

Established Member
Reaction score
24
Don't be a fool. Billions of dollars have been thrown at breast cancer research alone and we are still no closer to a cure than we were 50 years ago.

Medical research these days is a scam to get grant and donated money to keep people employed. Nothing more and nothing less.

- - - Updated - - -



Rule #2, when a cure seems near, refer to Rule #1.


Very cynical. And I agree with you 100%
 
K

karankaran

Guest
Umm..I think that cancer survival rates have increased - Yes, no cure but people are living longer with treatments. There is no cure for AIDS , people used to die within a few months in 1980s but now they have normal expectancy with antiretroviral drugs.

And again as it is always the case with conspiracy mongers, one can say 'oh these treatments are meant to earn money' - so , thousands of scientists and the funding agencies all over the world (yes, cancer research does not just happen in america) have signed to a conspiracy to keep the cure away. For this to happen, all of them would have to agree to some secret agreement written by some secret society comprised of govts and pharma companies. I mean , Seriously? !!
So many people are motivated to join scientific research to help people who suffer from diseases and suddenly, all of them, for the lure of money, forget their original intentions. - btw if money was the objective of people in research, they would go work as software programmers in silicon valley rather than work on a 2.5 k monthly pay in a university as RA for years.

But again , I might have been sent here by the 'secret society for advancement of diseases' to counter the 'enlightened' minds, who threaten to expose people like me and take away my 30 k annual salary at my university.
 

resu

Senior Member
Reaction score
1,352
A proper treatment would be a start, forget about a cure, just making this condition stop progressing would be an accomplished compared to the treatments we have now.
 

maher

Banned
Reaction score
68
Doctor: "You're a lucky kid. You could have suffered from male pattern baldness!"


fat+man+in+hospital.jpg
 

hellouser

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
2,634

EvilLocks

Senior Member
Reaction score
5,530

maher

Banned
Reaction score
68
dr. Cots. I dont take him serious anymore.. not for years..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V64ht1r8APo

- - - Updated - - -

Now, I just wait for OC to go on market. There are few clinical trials for OC atm. I just hope them to hurry up, to stop milking the grands money and inflating share prices like Cots.
Not the cure, but it should be a decent treatment.

- - - Updated - - -

You don't know know who this guy is. He told to each one of us here we were stupid and that he had found the cure for hair loss in his garage. How do you feel about that?

Here you go, that was his nonsensical topic: http://www.gourmetstylewellness.com/interac...oung2retires-MASTERING-THE-POTENTIAL-CURE-LOG


O, cmon Fred. You also said that at one point, on immortal hair.
 

corvidae

Member
Reaction score
3
It's always 5 years away. It's always been 5 years away. It will always be 5 years way.
people sometimes are so negative about these things, science seems to be developing at an exponential rate in general.
Think of the development of computers, in the 70s they were awful. Now in the modern day they're so fast people don't even need the power a modern everyday computer has
I think the problem with medicine is, although they might be making breakthroughs, every person is different and therefore it has to be tested extensively
 

benjt

Experienced Member
Reaction score
100
No breakthrough since 1999? Take a look at the following photos and pay special attention to the specified times the post treatment photos were taken:



 

hellouser

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
2,634
No breakthrough since 1999? Take a look at the following photos and pay special attention to the specified times the post treatment photos were taken:




So what? The treatment isn't available... and with Histogen's lousy progress, it will be a while before it's available.
 

benjt

Experienced Member
Reaction score
100
Yes, I expect things to take a while. Even RepliCel, who have progressed the farest in everything including licensing and trials, recently removed the estimate for availability of their treatment in Q4 2019 from their website. So they will likely take longer.

So, the good news is: The cure has actually been found. Histogen injects Wnt7a, RepliCel injects DSC cells, both work.
The bad news: We will not be getting it anytime soon.

By the way, as I explained in this post, Histogen was put out of business for a couple of years due to a lawsuit which put their operations on hold and ate up all their capital. Histogen's Phase 3 trials would be over by now if some a**h** hadn't decided to sue them. Both Histogen and RepliCel estimated market availability 2 years after the end of phase 3 trials, which would - in theory - have made Histogen's HSC available by the end of 2016. But a lack of finances as the result from the lawsuit was the problem. Now, Histogen hasn't even commenced Phase 3 yet.

I personally think, if the male pattern baldness foundation idea actually works out, its focus should be to provide RepliCel and Histogen with funding. Both approaches are proven to work and potentially give unlimited regrowth, but Histogen's loss of capital has set them back by more than 2.5 years. If they run out of capital to advance their trials again, this will introduce additional delay. And these two companies are the farest in development of an actual treatment, so our best chance of receiving treatment.
 

Python

Established Member
Reaction score
45
Yes, I expect things to take a while. Even RepliCel, who have progressed the farest in everything including licensing and trials, recently removed the estimate for availability of their treatment in Q4 2019 from their website. So they will likely take longer.

So, the good news is: The cure has actually been found. Histogen injects Wnt7a, RepliCel injects DSC cells, both work.
The bad news: We will not be getting it anytime soon.

By the way, as I explained in this post, Histogen was put out of business for a couple of years due to a lawsuit which put their operations on hold and ate up all their capital. Histogen's Phase 3 trials would be over by now if some a**h** hadn't decided to sue them. Both Histogen and RepliCel estimated market availability 2 years after the end of phase 3 trials, which would - in theory - have made Histogen's HSC available by the end of 2016. But a lack of finances as the result from the lawsuit was the problem. Now, Histogen hasn't even commenced Phase 3 yet.

I personally think, if the male pattern baldness foundation idea actually works out, its focus should be to provide RepliCel and Histogen with funding. Both approaches are proven to work and potentially give unlimited regrowth, but Histogen's loss of capital has set them back by more than 2.5 years. If they run out of capital to advance their trials again, this will introduce additional delay. And these two companies are the farest in development of an actual treatment, so our best chance of receiving treatment.

Well that's all we need to hear, benji. Let's pitch that idea to everyone, all those naysayers that keep saying we don't know where we're going to send that funding. Is there anyway you would be able to put both their techniques in a consice way, maybe in a few paragraphs? Explaining the science and why it's the cure. Then we could go to forums and announce it and really get things going.
 

TheShining

Established Member
Reaction score
6
So, the good news is: The cure has actually been found. Histogen injects Wnt7a, RepliCel injects DSC cells, both work.
The bad news: We will not be getting it anytime soon.
If this is the case, why is not this technique copied and provided by clinics in India and China already? All other inventions today are copied rapidly in this globalize world.
 
Top