- Reaction score
- 379
This is so very true.
But to what extent?
I think there would be a cut off where even like 6'4" and norwood 3 would be far more undesirable than 5'8" and a nw1 or 2.
In my opinion, it plays a big role if you are one standard deviation away from average.
So if you are under 5'7 I think it is better to be tall and bald rather than under 5'7 with hair. A guy who is 6 foot and bald will be able to attract more woman than a guy with a 8+ face/hair and 5'5 ( considering all other things equal.
If you are 5'7 to 5'11 (the average range) , then having hair is better than being taller and being bald. So if you are 5'8 with full nw1 hair then you will probably be better off than a 6ft baldy (assuming all other factors are equal).
This is just my opinion but its pretty logical tbh.
But theres something else we need to keep in mind. From what ive seen in life, just because a guy has hair doesnt make him attractive to woman. But if a guy is tall it automatically makes him attractive no matter what else he looks like (unless hes like next level deformed but most people arent).
Last edited: