Bring me 3 comparable cases and then we can talk. And I'm in a better position than you to judge this.
You're in such a good position to judge this, you're actually saying that companies
don't not follow through on patents.
I can give you more than 3 cases, just look up the patent filings for
any major company developing anything ever
As I've pointed out on these forums many times, Aderan's treatment did not achieve the result they wanted, but it did stop further loss. They could have profited from that alone, but they stopped funding it and just make wigs now...
Exaggeration is always good to read.
There is not a f*****g iota of exaggeration there. It's insulting you'd claim that.
Basically, Fidia has some sales who will reach out to the Derm and pharma, that's how it works. You can't advertise medecine like propecia and it doesn't make any sense to do so. Since Fidia has an US branch, you can expect this to be marketed outside of Europe.
You can't hear about such companies if you don't have a deep interest in a certain area.
Yeah, see...explain to me how this is supposed to spark the hair loss revolution like some posters feel it will?
You didn't check the Japanese news. And at this development point, what else would you expect?
I would expect to hear more because the technology behind it is easily the most significant advancement in hairloss ever. L'Oreal got way more coverage from a procedure that
haven't even done in so much as a mouse yet.
They won't be real competitors, not same price, clients, cosmetic vs. drug, and Jak will be only marketed in the US for a while I guess.
The point is that FIDIA is not peerless
Yeah, I went through this at the request of another user a few weeks back. All of that sh*t is amino acid and vitamins and I've never seen any of it on shelves. It's useless and you find it only if you go looking for it.
I never said we are not on the same page on this point.
More on this in a second
This policy covers everything.
Wut? I'm saying that if their is no announcement regarding the product in a few months, it's likely we won't hear anything at all.
That's usually the contrary. You don't know whether it will work or not and this is being realistic. This product won't need much to be profitable.
There is no question at this point that the lotion works. Have you bothered to read the original study on it, the patent, Brotzu's presentation, the testimony of a woman actually being a guinea pig for the lotion, etc. The question is how well it works and when or if it will be released.
You keep seeming to disagree with my assertion that even if the lotion is effective, it doesn't guarantee they will produce it, yet you keep arguing with points that agree with exactly this while at once saying "it won't take much for this to be profitable"...There could be any number of reasons behind the scenes that they may decide it's not worth it; we don't know.
Which is why all we can do, is wait and see and follow what little information we have.