View attachment 45862
Nothing new under the sun, but I don’t think that a lot of people paid attention to that table from this article:
https://www.docdroid.net/DQqlrBx/brotzu-il-dermatologo-anno-xxxvii-n1-2015-marzo.pdf.html
It shows the treatment results of eight middle aged women with androgenetic alopecia who used the lotion for three months.
The results were graded after 15, 30, 60 and finally 90 days of treatment. They graded the results as one of three responses: no effect, hair loss stopped or new hair growth. The final results were graded as fair, good or excellent. I translated the table as you can see here:
View attachment 45863
Before and after pictures of two of the subject’s final results after three months were also shown in the article:
View attachment 45864
This woman, referred to as A.C, was 66 years old and her final result was graded as excellent at the end of the study. There’s also a comment under the picture which says that she had stopped losing hair and had early regrowth of hair.
Interesting that they wrote
early regrowth of hair. Was it because they expected it to continue to improve with further treatment?
View attachment 45865
The other subject, referred to as S.U.S was 55 years old (or 50 as it says in the table). Her final result was graded as ‘good’ at the end of the study.
Personally, I think her result looked even better than the first subject. But maybe it has to do with the way they parted her hair in the before picture.
This study should be proof that the lotion also is effective in the treatment of androgenetic alopecia, at least in some individuals.
If it works for you and me we’ll just have to wait and see. But given that it was reported that hair loss stopped in all eight subjects and five out of them were reported to have new hair growth at the end of the study, I believe the chances are good that it will be an effective treatment for a lot of people here too.